Part of the reason why I didn’t completely recommend Article Ranks in the past is that:
#1- I didn’t understand it’s system
#2- I wanted to test it for 2-3 months
#3- I wanted to see how many links are sticking
#4- I wanted to talk to Musa, the owner of AR first, to clear up my questions
And I usually try to talk to the program owners on Skype or voice call before I write about something, so here’s some information about Article Ranks that might help you (and me) understand their service better. A lot of the following information is base don the hour or so conversation I had with him on Skype.
AR is a credits-based system, where having credits allows you to do certain things, like post articles, or post articles to more than one category at a time for wider distribution. This whole credits thing is the part that confused me the most, so here’s the FAQs that AR should have on their site:
If I pay for monthly submissions membership, do I have to pay to submit articles after I join?
No, monthly members get unlimited submissions, meaning that they can submit as much as they want, but if you want to get more out of it by submitting your articles to more than one category, like a broader category that is susceptible to getting wider syndication…then you’ll have to use up some credits to do so. So, a paid monthly member who wants more of a boost and wider syndication with their article ranks submission should order some credits, but there’s no need to always pay for credits when you can earn them by adding a site to their system.
What if I don’t want unlimited submissions, and just want to earn credits in order to post a few articles and get a few links
If you don’t need to blast the internet, or AR’s network with dozens of articles for massive link building then you can:
- pay as you go and pay for submissions,or…
- earn credits by adding a site to their system (if you add a site with PR you get more credits, the higher the Page Rank of the site the more credits or crediT you get).
- earn credits for adding some social site logins to their system,too
Suffice to say, this could be a real economical way for people who don’t need a lot of backlinks to basically pay a one-time fee (buy a domain with Page Rank), then add it to the system to earn credits).
What are the Article Ranks Page Rank and network size numbers?
Mostly Pr1-3 sites, smattering of higher PR sites,obviously less sites with higher Page Rank, and many of these sites will get their PR boosted with next PR updates anyway, so even adding a PR 0 site would have some long term value some day.
The AR network is over 3k sites, not sure about the IPs diversity but the network is still growing a quite a good clip. The vast majority of the sites in the network are “donor sites”, which caused me some concern because SEO LV, My Article Network, and1waylinks are all donor-site run networks and they’re all on my not recommended list. But with Article Ranks, the donor sites are either sites with Page Rank or sites about to get Page Rank, therefore of some quality, and more importantly, most importantly in fact… members who add donor sites to the system can specify how many submissions they’d like to receive and/or post daily.
This sort of puts the onus on the owners of the donor sites… to ensure their sites don’t become outbound link farms,to maintain their sites’ PR so to continue getting free submissions credits based on the Article Rank’s algorithm for PR value of donor site equaling their submissions credits potential.
What’s the whole article submissions process like, how many links can be expected,and what’s the indexing rate like?
Now that you know how the whole pricing system and credits earnings system works,is AR effective and what kind of damage can you do with it?
The Best Spinner has an export function (from what I’m told) that is compatible with Article Ranks submissions area but AR has its own spinner too. However, your submission acceptance rates and syndication levels (how many sites will accept this content?) is still dependent on the quality of your article, spun or not, manually spun articles get accepted more often,and how many backlinks you get via syndication is still based on the number of categories/sites where your article has a good chance of getting “hosted-and-posted”.
So if you write good spun articles in the technology, internet, health, and cars niches, then you’ll definitely get a good number of backlinks, like 125 per article written.
Indexing: Musa told me that their network gets about 50-70% indexing rate on articles submitted within first few weeks, with these numbers improving over time. Also, its good to note that they’ve added a feature that should increase indexing rates to an even higher level with their social boosting program, which works like this:
Give them your login information for X# of social accounts you have and they’ll do the posting and bookmarking for you. Not sure if they use all members’ profiles and accounts to social boost just your own articles or entire paid members base’s articles (that’d be best to avoid obvious self-promotion bans) but either way, it will still add even more value and indexing power to their service, that’s for sure.
Do you really get 100+ backlinks per article?
One of the URLS I tested in Article Ranks has 410 backlinks to it according to 3 different backlinks checkers, and I wrote 4 well-spun articles for linking to this site, which is page 2 for a somewhat competitive program name term. I can only suppose that another 4 articles would have me in top 5 for this term.
Is Article Ranks recommended?
Yes, it’s low enough priced, gets stuff indexed, network grows constantly and can move a site up in the rankings.
Disclosure: I managed to finagle a discount for you, 5 free credits to try out their system. It’s a coupon code tied into my affiliate link. So click the affiliate link here, then enter in the following code to get the discount. That’s 500 free backlinks… You’re welcome !:)
77e30d280e11b2fc04c6951a5f371804
Download Targeted Subscribers Wordpress Plugin Here





{ 115 comments… read them below or add one }
← Previous Comments
Just wanted to say I’ve been a Starter (in-between the free and Pro) member for many months now and I’m very happy with AR.
I’ve even recently upgraded to the Pro, mainly because I’ve gone over the 10 domain limit, plus I wanted to test out the priority distribution and twitter/fb features.
Seriously, you’re doing something wrong (probably with keyword research) if you’re an IM and can’t afford at least the Starter plan!
All I can say is I’m an IM and run a SEO firm. ***I wouldn’t use AR if it didn’t work!***
But as some people are saying, I don’t solely use AR but also BMR, bookmarks, PRs and some guest blogging.
I suggest people give it a go (but try the Starter, not free) for a couple of months before deciding. I sense a certain predetermined viewpoint from some of these negative comments…
And TomL, being rude doesn’t make you cool or put across your point any better.
Whether you think I’m rude or not… you’re right.
I have no intentions on investing in something that doesn’t show results when there are so many things that do.
If it works so well, how come people aren’t seeing it. When it comes to keyword research… you don’t want to start there… lol.
Regards,
TomL
I used Articleranks for several websites which had the same ranking already for several months. Even after about 100 articles with links posted they didn’t even go up 1 position… First articles were posted 6 weeks ago.
I can find a couple of posted articles with Majestic seo, but nothing with Google. It seems Google completely ignores these articles. At the same time links from PR0 linkdirectories and articles I posted on some of my own weblogs got indexed (and also show up in Google webmaster tools). It says something about Articleranks I think.
I don’t really understand your comment about keyword research, it’s completely irrelevant in this case. The domains I used had the exact keyword in the domainname. They only needed a little push to rank higher.
I feel sorry for this myself also. I have about 10 years experience with seo, with excellent results. But I think articlemarketing, or maybe it’s beter to say “distribution of articles with something like Articleranks” is not the best and most honest way to build links. It is cheating the system and I think it’s wrong. That is also why I never tried this before. But for some domains it’s difficult to get links…
I think the problem here we have established is most of the free members are the ones having complaints. However saying this, we do not want any unhappy users and have recently just added new indexing features which is for the free users aswell. And in the next few months will be contributing more high PR sites for free users.
@TomL the comment about people not seeing it works well – Well we have tons of satisfied paying users and publish many thousands of articles per day so if it was not working we would not have paying customers some whom have been with us 1+-2+ years. And I dont have a clue what you are talking about keyword research. Have you even used AR? Its not a keyword research tool mate.
@Musa
I’m not sure whether you have customers or not… and it doesn’t matter to me. My experience with your network was not good and I have tried it for quite some time. I spoke to some other SEO buddies of mine and they have the same opinion. I added some blogs into your service and that was a nightmare.
I have my opinion formed already and no amount of your public relations will fix it.
Regards,
TomL
PS: Don’t know what you’re talking about “keyword research” for either. What does this have to do with anything? I was answering a guy that was asking me about what kind of research I have done and that doesn’t matter in this conversation…. lol
TomL I am well aware you have formed your own opinion
We are not doing any PR to fix anything – Your opinions are based on the free/credit membership. Your words are chucking negative comments to the entire system which is not really a true valuation now is it
The system has 3 levels and you chose the bargain level to make your valuations on
FYI when I was talking about keyword research, I (obviously!) wasn’t saying AR is a keyword research system.
I was simply referring to the fact that if you’re an IM and can’t afford at least the Starter AR plan then you’re doing something wrong, probably keyword research / niche.
Tim, good point, something I refrain from stating on this blog but probably should is that no ONE service is going to do the trick for you, but some people only have the budget for one service so they put a lot of hopes into the one service doing the trick for them.
SEO is a budgetary concern mainly, the more you have to spend the more power you have over the competition. While I don’t rent links, I know my competition does, but since they do a better job of monetizing their sites, it’s worth it for them to pay for rented rankings.
I’ve been thinking about teaching people how to make money with websites and doing kw/niche/market research on this blog but if I did, then there’d be a dilution of content on this site, which is mainly about link building and link building services…tempting though….
It’s nice to see so many replies on my question
I am only a little bit dissapointed by the reply of Articleranks.
Your website doesn’t mention anywhere that there is any difference between the kind of weblogs where articles are posted for different plans. It does say something about “priority distributions”, but in my mind that is something completely different. English is not my native language but if I understand it correctly this can only mean that articles from members of your Pro plan have priority over articles from members of your “free” plan when articles are posted. It doesn’t say anything about lower PR’s of weblogs. On the page where your plans are compared to eachother it gives the same description also for each plan; “Distribution to Network of Blogs”, no differences are mentioned.
I also cannot really agree of you calling this part “free membership”. I paid $ 40 for “credits”, I have one of my own weblogs filled with other peoples useless (at least for me
articles. I spent 4 hours writing my own articles. And all I got in return are 3 articles indexed by Google on PR0 en PR1 weblogs. I think this is not free but expensive…
I also still think that posting 350 articles a day on a PR1 weblog is bad practice and useless. When reading your defense about this I remembered a saying I once read; “Your reputation is harmed the most by what you say to defend it.” It is so true…
Remember you get for what you pay for. Don’t expect to get the best off of a free service.
I don’t know if I would offer a free service that is weaker than the normal service to use to “entice” people to join the paid service. As we can see here, many are upset about it.
I do agree with Musa that you can’t just do one type of linking service (blog network, article directories, social bookmarks, etc.), mix it up.
Note: There are blog networks that work better than others. But to get the best you have to pay for it.
I have also noticed that many people only build links to one page at a time on a site, Google doesn’t like this, so when you are building links, do it to inner pages.
Is the following possible:
Be a monthly member and not submit a site to the network? Are there additional costs to submit an article?
Is anyone surprised that “free” networks aren’t very powerful, but the paid ones are much more powerful? As my mother use to tell me, you don’t get something for nothing.
And if your sharing high page rank sites, to get articles published, and your articles are getting published on crap sites, that should tell you:
1) Don’t share a high page ranked blog just to get “links” because the links you will get “suck”.
2) Maybe you should try paying for a good content network (like seocontentnetwork.com) rather than trying to be part of network that you don’t “pay” for.
I have also read many of the strategies that people still use on these content networks. These strategies no longer work.
Googles latest algorithm change “freshness” along with their entire structure of their site to https shows that have changed how they look at search and how they look at indexing. My suggesting is to create fresh new content on your sites blog, and use these content networks to build links back to that days blog posts.
Fresh content is very important now. I don’t care what content network you use to promote your new content; BMR, AR, Dan’s new service, or any other example I have used, my point is that you need fresh content on a daily basis, and to give it more authority that knew content needs to get links pointed at it.
One of our clients does a new press release on prweb daily, several others do one new blog post daily, a few others do 3 blog posts daily. The one thing in common for all of these sites is the use of content networks to syndicate the content and generate back links.
You don’t have to hire us to do it, you can do it yourself. I plug what works.
I don’t really understand the spinning system that AR have. It is so confusing.
I am trying article ranks out and will feedback on the results i am getting. some keywords are low competition and some medium to high but I will try it out to see how effective it is.
with respect to the content you use using new content rather than leveraging an exisitng article is debatable but I will try this out.
← Previous Comments