Thanks for the help with BLS. I’m using it like a pro now.

I also jumped on board with TLJ and wanted to know if you use the strategy Peter recommends for setting up 11 campaigns with 5 directly promoting different pages on your target website and 6 for articles that point to your main website.

It sounds like a smart strategy and I’m even thinking of adding your HubPages strategy along with a few web 2.0 sites in place of some of the article directories Peter suggests. I’m thinking this will help me add more link juice to a larger variety of pages (other than article directories) pointing to my main website(s).

I am curious to know how you’re using TLJ, though – without revealing your niches, of course.

If you’ve already laid out your strategy in a blog post or comment, just point me to it and I’ll get crackin’.

Thanks,
Paul

But the one thing I haven’t seen is results. Even just a preliminary set would be helpful so that we can get some idea whether of not this service is worth the money. It doesn’t matter how many cool features the software has (or how great the content spinning is) if it doesn’t do the job it was intended to do!

2-4 article per week distributed to free traffic system and several other top quality directories.

I have actually been fairly happy with the back links from FTS. I’m just not sure if their newtwork of blogs grow that fast hencing bringing in new links.

I have found that aticlesbase.com is the best for my industry.
Matt @ dating sites´s last blog ..jenny2000

Thanks for the super quick reply. I will check out the methods you have recommended and may take a stab at the Link Dozer learning curve. I also thought I would pass along the text of the rejection notice that UAW sent me:

“Links in Resource Box do not seem to relate to article content, which may confuse the reader. Please ensure that the links in your resource boxes take the reader to a link where they can find more information on what they just read. Once you have corrected these issues, please feel free to resubmit your article for approval.”

Thanks again for your help!

Bruce

On the other hand, I know Link Dozer has no such restrictions and neither does My Article Network (not recommended btw) but with any networks that are somewhat human-dependent (needing people to accept and publish your content) there’s the inherent risk of link deletions or article rejections. I think you’ll be fine if you just use UAW to drive backlinks to your link wheel entities using rotating resource box urls, you’ll get DoFollow decent PR backlinks from hubpages and these have some staying power to them and are quality links, same idea applies to an EZA article that gets PR and direct traffic, too.

Hope this helps, if not please ask away

Thanks again,

Dan

The problem I have with UAW is that they do not allow URLs in the resource boxes that do no relate to the content of the article. Many people are using UAW under the false impression that this is ok, but eventually their articles will start being rejected when UAW discovers the varying links.

This policy destroys the effectiveness of UAW for anyone promoting lots of Adsense sites with articles unrelated to the micro site content, like in the XFactor method. Dan, do you know of any article submitters that will allow multiple resource boxes like UAW but not have the restrictions on URLs having to be related to the article content?

Dave you bought BLS from me and are happy with it, but I’m pretty confident that my best practices/getting started video helped you to get rolling with it and understanding it sooner rather than later. Look, most services are busy enough fixing their bugs, attending to their forums, doing customer support etc….but if they took a longer-term view and provided actionable steps to take it would reduce their overall support times, but they don’t get this concept, it’s enterprise-level corporate style thinking here, and any efficiency expert will tell you that you will reduce support times and costs when you provide clearer instructions up front.

ACTION PLANS: I hated SE Nuke at first because I didn’t know which way to turn, what thing to do first and exactly WTF is SE Nuke good for anyways?(Answer: link wheels). It’s not too much to ask to give people a PDF saying:

1-create these accounts first, then these accounts, then these accounts
2- Then go verify everything, activate all registrations
3- Create content
4- Build a link wheel
5- PLAN your linkwheel out -articles to hubs, hubs to money site, etc…
6- Submit content to directories and web 2.0 properties
7- Social nuke the whole enchilada
8- RSS Nuke the whole enchilada

How hard was this? Seriously, 8 bullet points done deal

So why don’t these services do this?

That’s where the Dan Man comes in,to showpeoplehow to use these services effectively.

I’m working on some PDFs for SE Nuke,UAW and BLS now as bonuses and as action plans with seo strategies that are best fits for the types of services the PDFs are for.

I appreciate your unsympathetic point of view here though since you’re a true SEO professional, but you might want to have some EMpathy for the larger audience which isn’t same caliber as you, not yet anyways

Please know that there’s a bit of a learning curve going into Link Dozer though and you need to really slog your way through the videos and the technical aspects of it before you roll something out. It really is quite powerful and is definitely a long term venture for anyone who delves into this. SE Nuke is really good too, but I never stayed wit hit long enough to develop proper tests for it and to basically come up with a best practices guide for using it.

SENuke doesn’t give you any action plans or SEO training help whereas Link Dozer does and you really need a course of action to follow when you’re using all in one solutions like SE Nuke, Link Dozer, Web2 Mayhem or any of the other similar type services

Thanks,

Dan

Please know that there’s a bit of a learning curve going into Link Dozer though and you need to really slog your way through the videos and the technical aspects of it before you roll something out. It really is quite powerful and is definitely a long term venture for anyone who delves into this. SE Nuke is really good too, but I never stayed wit hit long enough to develop proper tests for it and to basically come up with a best practices guide for using it.

SENuke doesn’t give you any action plans or SEO training help whereas Link Dozer does and you really need a course of action to follow when you’re using all in one solutions like SE Nuke, Link dozer, Web2 Mayhem or any of the other similar type services

I did not know Link Dozer but I will see after read your review. Do you have a review of Link Dozer?

Thank you,
Hardi -
Hardi – Belajar Internet Marketing´s last blog ..Tantangan 120 Hari Asian Brain

I would start using this ASAP since there’s plenty of people who say its worked well for them including some references on the leadsleap.com blog. However, I’ve tested mostly the bonus links part that we get as lifetime gold members and that’s where I’ve seen zero results.

Definitely keep the membership though, a lifetime of links will definitely pay off at some point, and I’ve given Kenneth some suggestions on how to make this network and service work better and faster, but again, there’s people claiming good results on their blog (leadsleap) so maybe it’s just a fluke with the 5 urls I tested but to me 5 urls being tested is more than enough to get a good reading. MAybe I will try the article submissions part since that’s not somethin gI di dmuch with yet and maybe where the really valuable links are generated (not the bonus links)

Thanks,
Dan

I got the lifetime gold membership for ezarticlelink back when you first mentioned it. I just haven’t bothered to do anything with it yet so I’m not sure what bugs you are talking about.

So you’re recommending to wait for now? Can you update us as to when it’s ok to start using it? Also, any tips on how to best utilize it?

Thanks,
Dan

Thanks,

Dan

P.S. I will send you some tips for getting started quickly, and it’s sort of a best practices guide, too

I went on BLS’s website and they say the program is closed. Did I miss something?

Thanks again

Marc

Does it make sense to use both backlink solutions and UAW. I am building out a network of 400 mini-sites that are to be stand alone sites that can earn me say $5 daily. Every day I create one and market it right away.

Though the links come in slowly as I use a drip of say 5 -10 daily from UAW

I get links from a range of places and follow one major strategy. This includes 1 blast to UAW using major spin and spinning keywords and titles. Linking to both inner pages and the home page.

Should I also get links from Backlink solutions, I have not signed up yet but will I be able to promote 2 sites daily and do they accept spun articles, titles and keywords?

Is it worth it?
Mark String´s last blog ..Twitter Crash – September 13 2009

Russ

Yeah what you want is Backlink Solutions for your sites. Using The Link Juicer in combination with BLS is even better. This varies the types of links your site receives. I would also throw up a linkwheel with SENuke if you have it. If you don’t have The Link Juicer at least do deep bookmarking with Bookmarking Demon or whatever bookmarking software you use.

Not only will I have the advantage of keywords in my domain I will be using link building services and sophisticated and expensive SEO software. Dan has only touched on the basics so far but it goes on for a couple more levels.

It’s up to you but I highly suggest you follow Dan’s method.

Just imagine the uproar within the internet marketing community would be if these sites were suddenly deleted on a whim. I personally don’t think it will ever happen and Griz even mentioned in a post before that he wasn’t worried at all. I do agree with your viewpoint though that you need to own your own stuff instead of using sites like Squidoo or Hubpages.

But these 2.0 sites are still good at gaining backlinks as you have explained in numerous posts.

@David – With web 2.0 sites, I mean you can still try to get the keywords in the subdomain of say blogger. com or wordpress. com although it might take a little longer to gain authority and rankings. Grizzly’s blog can be found here makemoneyforbeginners.blogspot.com and he ranks for most of the ‘make money’ keywords.

BTW while I’m not familiar with Grizzly but what is he thinking? He is one xrumer blast and spam complaint away from deletion. If he ranked above me in the serps he wouldn’t for long.

Remember, most hosting plans allow more than one domain to be hosted per account. So this means when you finish this niche these accounts can be used on your next.

For me, compared to the cost of articles, link building services and software hosting fees are basically negligible.

Just so you know, I am using the XFactor micro niche approach — minisites, 5 pages or so, Adsense and so on. The thing I like the most about this method is its simplicity.

If I can reasonably automate or semi-automate the linkbuilding and, yet, keep things simple, I’d be glad to follow one of your affiliate links.

I tried UAW but I thought the links it gave me looked too spammy. I ended up canceling the service.

I also tried Link Dozer but, wow, the learning curve is beyond steep — it’s almost vertical! So much setting up before actually linking, I just don’t have the time to do all that.

How does Backlink Solutions compare to both?

Thanks,
Max

I think griz runs his mothership site off a blogger blog and that’s just crazy sounding to me because it’s not really owned and controlled by him but his blog’s been around for a while and he does have other self hosted domains so he’d recover quickly if Google decided to remove his site on a whim. On the other hand he’s glomming off the authority of Google itself with a blogger blog so its bleeding authority and trust down to his site which is good.

And the same applies for creating web 2.0 properties on solid trusted sites like Squidoo and HubPages its easier to gain PageRank and SERPs, but if you want to be a businessperson then you nee d to own, not rent your assets, but that’s just my point of view. Another thing to consider is conversions and traffic funneling on the web 2.0 properties. You don’t have any control over what ads and banners go where, nor do you have much control over what’s being linked OUT to on these properties. If you don’t control your assets, you don’t control the (buying/conversion/funneling) process, therefore its just good business sense to spend an extra 40/month to have more control over these aspects of your business

Thanks for getting back to me. The only reason I ask about this is that it would be rather expensive to build a mini network around each money site in terms of additional domain fees and hosting. I understand why you would be hesitant about using 3rd party sites since they can remove your stuff on a whim.

But I think if you post legit and unique content, then it should be okay for the most part. I know Ben from makemoneyonlinewithseo. com and Grizzly advocate using free support sites like today. com but I imagine that they would take a little longer to increase in rankings for target keywords.

When you build out the mini network, do you link to the mothership site right away? Or will you wait until the support sites gains a little more authority before sending a link?

Thanks!

Hann

You see right through me and know that I’m trying to simplify total niche domination, or rather a solid SEO strategy in just a few blog posts. This whole idea and method is applicable only to people who truly do want to dominate a niche and not for people who have 70 unrelated sniper or xfactor-type sites and business model

So yes, you could do things this way but as David so astutely pointed out, these 3d party entities could be the wider webring, the outer spokes of a link wheel that lend seo weight to the satellite sites, which the in turn lend weight to the main site

***This is my opinion and only how I do things – Dan may disagree. He is also trying to simplify this but some may want a little more detail.***

At this stage you should have your main site and four of so satellite sites. Now your main site must remain pure. As whitehat as whitehat can be. We don’t want to give Google ANY reason to de-value your incoming links to it. Link your satellite sites to your main site. No other links should go to your main site – only links from your satellite sites. Using Dan’s method you don’t need many links to rank.

Your satellite sites should link to your main site. Link main pages to main pages and sub-pages to sub-pages. Now randomly link these sites in an open linkwheel in the same fashion (main to main – pages to pages).

At this point you want to begin link building on your satellite sites.

Here is the services I recommend for the satellites:

Back Link Solutions – remember to deep link
The Link Juicer – remember to deep link
(I would save Unique Article Wizard for the next step – promoting your open linkwheels)

Programs I recommend at this stage:

Bookmarking Demon
RSS Bot or SENuke (RSS submission)

Once you have your services setup and deep bookmarking and RSS submissions have been done that’s it for this stage. Next should be web 2.0 open link wheels and promoting those but I’m sure Dan will post about that.

No not really. The whole idea here is to dominate a niche using the power of the domain name keywords and funneling link juice back from your outlying web assets back to your satellite domains and eventually to your main site. Without the satellites (or with the satellites on the same IP) you won’t be able to link to each other or the links will be ineffective. This means you get one site on page one instead of several greatly reducing the amount of traffic you will receive from your efforts.

Remember, the link juice you are building is cumulative. When you start your next niche (which should be related to your current niche) and link your main pages together you will be passing a large amount of link power. This is an extremely powerful technique Dan is teaching you here.

How many accounts you need varies with how competitive the keywords are you are going after. I would get at least four of five to start. One for the main site and four satellite domains. You can always add more later should they be needed.

Now this is just the start. The next step is building authority to your satellite domains linking into to your main site by using web2.0 parasites. I’m sure Dan will explain all that later.

If you don’t want to get a bunch of different hosts, is this technique worth doing?
Robert´s last blog ..The Best Spinner Review

I use Backlink Solutions for most of the direct linking to money sites though

Google has only a few things it will do to any site it considers to be misbehaving. There is a -30 and a -950 penalty, de-indexing (rare) or nullifying the value of certain types of incoming links. Do some research and know what these are and why they are applied. This will help you quit worrying about Big G and focus on getting traffic to your sites.

Elbert, I’m on Skype almost all the time

Marco, I not only demystified the whole dupe content issue but also proved it and showed others how to demystify it for themselves here > http://linkvanareviews.com/duplicate-content-penalty-test-quick-update

David, thanks for pointing out that on site reference.

Folks, the easiest thing to do when faced with indecision on seo myths, ideas, theories, etc,,… is merely to go out and test things in a reasonable way

That’s what I meant by penalty, all the duplicates will get discarded or don’t count, eventually by google. What I meant by damaging the site is, it can also deindex the whole site publishing the duplicate contents, if the site is over use in duplicated content.

Macro, you can try out BLS and or ezearticles.com, I’m still seeing great result with BLS, just use the things taught from Kristina and use them on BLS and you get even better results.

I hear good things about ezearticles.com from people, and you can outsource spinning from articles for couple of bucks with their writers. I haven’t use it since I chose LD over ezearticles.com at that time.

yes I did have a few duplicate articles, and Kristina was notified of it, as it actually happened while i was having issues with LD. Like it was hanging on me and the only way was to shut it down via the Task Manager. People were having the same issue with registrations where LD would hang and they would get like 600 registratin emails from one of the C1 sites, there were several cases posted in the forums) . I actually spent a number of late night hours with Kristina on MSN trying and testing for her and for the other members and, AGAIN, i think she does a great job.
I am perfectly aware that of what was said about duplicate content, though I think it is partially a myth,(there is an interesting post on google webmaster central dating back to 2008 demistifying it..) and yes i did sometimes articles that were not changed one but BUT, those were Ezinearticles, copied verbatim from EzineArticles, as a regular blog owner would(should) do.

Still , the number of blogs where you can post to is very limited. posting to articles.domain1.com and then to news.domain1.com still shows backlinks coming from ONE IP, and on top of that most of those domains have 0 to no PageRank.

And also the content spinner restriction to six words sequences is a severe limitation.

I am not saying it is bad or a scam or anything like, i do think Kristina is a great person and always ready to help, just that it is overrated , and that of course is my personal opinion, and it still forces you to do a lot of tasks yourself or outsource those tasks, which could be fine by some people but it is not what I was looking for.

marco
marco lavanna´s last blog ..Read and identify forex signals

That said not spinning the article would be a huge waste of time because only one link would count when posting to all these blogs.

http://linkvanareviews.com/duplicate-content-penalty-test-quick-update

I was just stating that since you had a hard time using the software, it’s better to cancel it since you’re just wasting money.

However, the reason I sound like the way I was is this… I saw duplicated content in the C1, the article was even not even changed one bit, and it look like it was blasted out into the blogs, and I see the 2 same links pointed back to your blog. I’m fairly certain they belong to you?

I apologize if I sound like I’m latching at you, but I am very sure Kristina explicitly stated to never post duplicated content to the C1/C2, because as she stated herself : “If you intend to post the SAME ARTICLE you will get duplicated content which is a BIG NO NO. Every duplicated article can potential penalize your compaign. I am not saying this because of me,, or because it is someone’s imaginary idea, but because it CAUSES DAMAGE to your SEO to publish duplicated articles as well as to the sites that you post your articles to.”

This is an excellent post. I would like to back up Dan here and stress the importance of domain names matching your targeted phrases. It also might be a good idea to open hosting accounts with four or five different hosting companies. This will give your mini sites network ip diversity. SEO-hosting could also be used. Remember Google is also a domain registrar so using less than truthful domain registration data will help hide ownership of the domains here.

Sometimes people get possessive, defensive or territorial about the programs or services they use. Many SE Nuke people got mad at me for opining that Link dozer was/is better than SE Nuke. Fact is, it’d be great if some things in Link Dozer were more automated, but what’s being Taught is very valuable and worth the first month’s fee, easily

marco
marco´s last blog ..California and The Gold Rush

Hey Dan, can we talk on skype? I have a question about something and I can’t post it here on public.

the amount of sites you can post to is nowhere close to 1000 as mentioned above, unfortunately, maybe closer to 150/200 I would sayPLUS the C1 and C2 sites really shouldn’t be counted twice as they are on the same IP/domain, just different subdomains, PLUS the c1 / C2 sites have low to no PR AND in some cases they are from the same IP thus not really giving you much benefit in terms of IP diversity.
True, you have the peace of mind of knowing that even though you don’t own the sites you can post/edit/delete as if they were and above all be sure that your blog will not be removed, but is that worth the price tag? I personally don’t think so and again, I have been using it intensively for 2 months+

Marco
marco´s last blog ..California and The Gold Rush

Anyhow, the GOAL of the mini-net sites approach is like you said, to get a lot of small related domain names and link them together in a seemingly natural way. Each mini-site will be an authority on those terms and their links to the mothership will carry a lot of weight, and this is how you dominate a niche.

Another example that I just told someone via email is to hoard all the domain names and make them 100% unique content 1-page landing page like sites and direct link from those landing pages to various urls on mothership site,and the more links you push towards the single-page kw optimized domains, the higher they will rank and the more link juice gets passed towards the mothership site.

I myself am doing the mini-site approach. Usually I make sites with an exact search of around 5000-10000 per month. What broad/exact search volume are you targeting for both your “mother ship” blog and for your mini blogs.

Also, are you linking all your mini blogs to the mother blog?

Usually my sites are non-related. It sound like you are taking the approach to get a lot of small related domain names. Do you feel this is better?
Robert´s last blog ..The Best Spinner Review

Thanks for keeping me “honest” , I gotta keep the content level up to par here!

Dan

I also like to post on related forums with links in signature, write press releases, and high PR directory submissions.
Robert´s last blog ..The Best Spinner Review

Im pretty sure it will be worth the wait.

There are more and more people who prefer Link Dozer than SENuke nowadays and I would like to get the real score before diving head first as I value my time very highly.

I’ll be sure to check back often.

All the best,
-Yan Kirby

I haven’t recieved your email yet. My site is quite small and I’ve just done a ’site:’ query and all my pages are indexed.

However, form what I’ve read, load times are compared to other site sin your geographic region, not just overall load time for a site compared to all other sites on the ‘net.

I will provide a list soon though, since you asked.

Thanks,

Dan

I have a website that I did a fair bit of SEO on in the past and it ranked well for a while – like position 6. However since then its just sort of dropped, after probably a year its now resting between position 9 to 14. I must admit I was quite sporadic in my link building and did it all at once with autopligg, that was when that tool still worked. I also outsourced some article directory submission. This keyword should not be hard to rank for, a guy in the top 3 seems to get away with around 119 links (he’s number 1 at the mo) whilst everyone else seems to be building around 300 to 2,500 links.

I’m a little lost where to go, I have some ideas but not a lot of money to implement them, I currently use adwords to get about 1,500 visitors a month, this is bringing a steady income but its not hands off and we’re only above breaking even. I know with a top ranking for this keyword we would see at least a doubling in visitors and enough income to really make the website worthwhile.

What I’d like is for someone experienced to point me in the right direction and assure me that I’d be spending my money well if I used something like backlink solutions for instance.

Would you be kind enough to email me using the email address I’ve used to commented with, I will divulge my keyword and past SEO efforts, I will probably join any link building service you recommend (if you truly recommend it from the bottom of your heart)

Thank you

Alright Dan,

ARE YOU READY TO RUMBLE!

Relax and/or grow up please, this isn’t a p—-ing contest, and I could care less what a less knowledgeable person thinks. I know what I know and with respect toward certain things I know more than most people. There’s too much bad info (and reviews!) out there in the SEO world, so authoritative true knowledge is what I’m after, not the opposite, and it’s the purpose of this blog, basically.

I always give my honest opinion.

So do I, after thoroughly reviewing and using something for a while. Far better to say that something took XYZ days to figure out than to say, “I couldn’t get it to work at all”

I have absolutely no financial interest in any of the products listed on this website.

On the other hand I DO have a vested interest in some of the products of this website since I’m an affiliate of some of the programs and services being touted here. Since I do have much to gain (and much to lose) by making recommendations, I feel the need for accuracy, which is why you’re getting shut down here, I can’t let your inaccurate statements slide by.

Why would I bash a product I thought would be useful to the readers here? I wouldn’t. I recommend what’s good and point out what I don’t like about a service.

Same thing that I do, just more accurately though

I pointed out problems with The Link Juicer. Guess what? Those problems were fixed although I may have hurt the owners pride a little bit. Now The Link Juicer is on your recommended page. As it should be.

Replies like “I wonder if you really even used it” or “I could go on and on on all your incorrect points but why bother, you tried for a day and quit, and it takes at least 1 day to just watch all the videos, then a few more days to build the other stuff up” are less than helpful.

I do this shit for a living and it doesn’t take me days to set up a program. Xrumer took me all of about 20 minutes to figure out. That’s just rude Dan. Why you wanna be hostile like that?

Strike 1- You said Link Dozer doesn’t teach you about SEO. You’re wrong, she does.

Strike 3- You said the email creator doesn’t work, you’re wrong about this too since there’s no need for an email creaor because they’ve already done that for you, plus provided hundreds of aliases that can be and are associated with that email address

Dave, you’ve been pretty rude with some of your comments here on this site directed towards the newbies you look down your nose at.

This means you’re right 90-95% of the time then

I am telling you that this was unusable on my system. Maybe it was my box (I have a very high end computer) but maybe it wasn’t. I was not able to use it. Period.

I have a Dell Inspiron laptop with Windows 7 on it and it works fine, so the issue there is with your high-end box, not with Link Dozer and not with Windows 7

ARE YOU READY TO RUMBLE!

I always give my honest opinion. I have absolutely no financial interest in any of the products listed on this website. Why would I bash a product I thought would be useful to the readers here? I wouldn’t. I recommend what’s good and point out what I don’t like about a service.

I pointed out problems with The Link Juicer. Guess what? Those problems were fixed although I may have hurt the owners pride a little bit. Now The Link Juicer is on your recommended page. As it should be.

Replies like “I wonder if you really even used it” or “I could go on and on on all your incorrect points but why bother, you tried for a day and quit, and it takes at least 1 day to just watch all the videos, then a few more days to build the other stuff up” are less than helpful.

I do this shit for a living and it doesn’t take me days to set up a program. Xrumer took me all of about 20 minutes to figure out. That’s just rude Dan. Why you wanna be hostile like that?

Now we agree about 90 to 95% of the time but on Link Dozer it’s a huge disagree. I am telling you that this was unusable on my system. Maybe it was my box (I have a very high end computer) but maybe it wasn’t. I was not able to use it. Period.

I have Windows 7, I got it to work, Content Spinner works. If you couldn’t get content spinner to work then how are you not impressed with content output?

They provide you with an email to use, so there’s no email creation part to get frustrated with.

It does teach you about SEO, a lot actually.

It does set up random link wheels, its one of the things that’s taught there…

Since LD is a self contained network, you can be registered on hundreds of blogs in 5-10 minutes automatically, and with different logins and usernames for each one stored in the system for you,

I could go on and on on all your incorrect points but why bother, you tried for a day and quit, and it takes at least 1 day to just watch all the videos, then a few more days to build the other stuff up.

Couldn’t help but notice in the Comment Policy on your pages

“Please lick the ReTweet (TweetMeme) buttons”

I’m assuming this is a typo or you are having some fun with internet newbies

I can’t talk to much about this but this is some of the things I noticed right away.

* The email creation did not work and after about 10 minutes I gave up and did it in SENuke in about 2 seconds.

* Profile import did not work crashed application the first time and took several tries to apparently be successful – then got out of profile boxes later on.

* Registering for the special blogs did not work. Was forced to use task manager to get out of the program.

* Auto form fill did not work as expected.

* The content spinner did not work period. Very disappointed in this.

I gave up at this point and didn’t bother trying to use the rest of the features as nothing I had tried so far had worked correctly. So this was a hundred bucks down the toilet. I canceled after one day and a lot of frustration.

Link Dozer does have somewhat of a learning curve. Not a bad one (if you can sit through the hours of videos). This program is not for someone who isn’t doing most of their submissions manually. This program is really an organizer for your SEO campaigns. If someone was doing all their link building by hand, this application would keep them organized and possibly save them some time if it worked correctly. The problem is it doesn’t work correctly.

This program does NOT teach you about SEO. It does not setup your random linkwheels or whatever. The user does all of this themselves with no guidance from the system.

I have seen the content this application produces and I’m not impressed. It produces standard spun text that I can spot a mile away. I think people are confusing quality with unique here.

The selling point for this system is it works better and your links will have staying power to keep your site at the top of the search engines. Here is an idea. Promote your backlinks and see if that doesn’t do the same thing. Just common sense here people and basic SEO.

Another commenter on asked about Back Link Solutions. BLS works very well and I would use them over Link Dozer any day.

Your recommendation changes now: BLS-UAW-Linkvana-LinkJuicer. I read a few month ago your choice for #4 is MAN.

I would like to join MAN but, you did not state the benefit of it and LinkJuicer will be my 4th favourite I think.

Thank you,
Hardi -
Hardi from Belajar Internet Marketing´s last blog ..3 Weeks Join Article Wizard My Traffics Growing Double – Review

A deciding factor would be the allintitle competition and the link profiles of the pre-existing top-ranking sites for these terms. You’d have to find similar competition levels with competing sites with similar levels of quality links (link profiles) to set some sort of fair and balanced comparison base.

I agree if it was only one site but I meant take 5 keywords of roughly equal competiveness, strength of competition etc, and launch say 5 Google Sniper sites each based around one of the keywords you selected. Then fire up each software but only use one of the tools as the only method of promotion and link building for the site. Eg. site A uses Content Buzz, site B uses SENuke etc.

Maybe you already have a good idea who would come out on top?

You might want to read this thread here about SE Nuke versus EVO II

I like your idea for side by side program testing, but it’s virtually impossible to determine which link by what program or service had XXX effect on one site only being tested….

ContentBuzz is program whose main strength is social media marketing and video marketing, too, which allows for more site exposure but it’s not something that will increase your rankings, really. Video is good for direct traffic, social bookmarking is best for getting stuff indexed and manual target audience interaction, like doing manual, not bot-generated…. tweeting and bookmarking and such…

Frank you might want to read how i test link building services to arrive at my conclusions and recommendations

Thanks for the question,

Dan

Backlink Solutions is the service I get the most thanks for and is a service I still use. For same price as BLS, you can get Link Dozer which has like a 1-2 week learning curve but is quite powerful. However, if you want to shorten your learning curve you can wait until I give the go-ahead for when LD comes out with something that comes pretty close to eliminating the learning curve.

Sick Profile Maker does ok for low to medium competition terms

Thanks for the prompt reply.

Yes, your answer is far more valuable than what I received from UAW.

I do agree with you when you said that on page seo and some competition check will pretty much do the trick.

If you dont mind me asking, what other programs have been very effective for you? Perhaps im just missing a service that I need to have to grow my business.

All the best,
-Yan Kirby

PS I bought UAW from a blog talking about the same things you are tackling here. If I landed here first, I wouldnt have mind using your affiliate link.

In days where autoblogs grew to a drastic scale, your blog is gem.

Like anything SEO and/or link building related, you don’t want to be too dependent on any one method or source for backlinks and a few links will work a lot better if you spread them out a bit using link wheels that are built properly for maximum effect.

About UAW’s response: I think sometimes they know just how big and popular they are and forget how they got that way, …by taking good care of their customers and displaying concern for their client’s/member’s successes.

Truth be told, if the on-page SEO is there and the competition isn’t totally ridiculous you only need a few quality backlinks to get your desired SERPs.

Hope this helps, and is perhaps a better answer than the non-answer you received from UAW.

Thanks,

Dan

Ive been using UAW for two months now and ive been happy with them until this past few weeks.

I noticed the link counts drop (mine dropped 60%).

On one of my websites, I used to have 305 links in there about 3-4 weeks ago and now, it just has 113 links according to yahoo explorer.

On my other website, I used to have 265 links about the same time I checked the first one. And now, guess what I only have 102 links according to Y! explorer.

I submitted a ticket to them but they replied I have to contact yahoo for the drastic decrease of my links. I was put really off with this reply. I just dropped 60% of my links and they wouldnt even bother.

I am pretty sure with this results as I only use UAW for backlinks of these two sites.

Do you have any experiences regarding this issues? I think this month is my last with them if I dont have a real answer to this one. At 67/month, this is not the cheapest service.

Please let me know what you think.

All the best,
-Yan Kirby

Also, on the re-sends, you gotta make sure to change as much as possible about the articles, what anchor text is, what url being linked to is, the article itself, area of body of article where hyperlink is placed etc…

Services like The Link Juicer use DoFollow ebook submission sites to generate DoFollow backlinks and TLJ works OK, but not a super-powerful service like BLS, UAW and Link Dozer, and even SE Nuke

The limited time I used them it hasn’t produced much yet. Would be interested if you or anyone else has any feedback on this.

Regards
Ric´s last blog ..How to Boost Google Adsense Income

Now, with that in mind, you can link to other sites (perhaps part of your link wheel) and build up links to them automatically with a second, rewritten submission.

If UAW is having trouble with footprints like some people suggested then would other similar services like AMA or even BLS suffer the same fate? It scary which service to use and how to use them effectively, isn’t it?

Huddson
Huddson´s last blog ..Inspirations From Will Smith

Link Dozer is more scalable and has a steeper learning curve

I’m not saying that Hubs are made for backlinks only, as the post here said, but also for getting quality backlinks and easily creating quality sites that get ranked well on their own with little effort. I wrote this post because it amazed me how some of my hubs are ranking, even for terms I wasn’t “working on”

Thanks for stopping by,

Dan

It’s really not that hard to get a hubber score over 75. Just make sure you follow the rules regarding linking (no more than 2 links to a single domain per hub) and post only unique content (that is, nothing you’ve also published on other sites). It also doesn’t hurt to get involved in the community a little… take the time to participate a little in the forums, follow some other users, read some hubs, leave thoughtful comments. We reward users who aren’t just trying to scam the system.

Happy Hubbing!

Dan

I’ve decided to stay with UAW and dump Synnd. After finally wrapping my head around how UAW works, I see how I can get the most out of my UAW submissions with a little work. Your strategy now makes perfect sense to me.

Thanks for you help…I’ll be re-tweeting your UAW strategy.

Paul

I don’t know of any discounts for UAW and am not sure they’ll give any away. I find them rather un-responsive to emails sent, non-responsive actually….

Thanks for the feedback on the site, I appreciate it!

Dan

I mentioned in this post here how to avoid the UAW footprint, hope it helps if you continue using UAW http://linkvanareviews.com/is-unique-article-wizard-still-effective

I will probably test Syndd sometime within the next few months, but as things stand right now I don’t have a use for it. Social media site promotion is best done on personal basis, and the value to social media-generated backlinks in the short-term isn’t the social bookmarking links but the direct traffic it generates.

Thanks for maintaining such a great blog. I’ve found your advice to be invaluable.

I see it’s been a while since you last commented on this post. Is the Backlink Solutions/UAW combo still viable?

I definitely plan to sign up for Backlink Solutions this week. But I’m on the fence about UAW. Right now I’m using UAW under a special trial offer. So, I’m not able to report any results yet. I’m also using another service called Synnd (have you heard of it – http://www.socialmediascience.com/). I’m using it under a 14-day trial as well.

Both Synnd and UAW carry the same $67/month price tag. I have my reasons for wanting to keep both as well as reasons for wanting to get rid of one or the other while using it along with Backlink Solutions.

For instance, I like that Synnd uses a software to automate the bookmarking and syndication of content for every campaign you enter into the system. On the other hand, I find the long-standing reputation of UAW attractive but am a bit concerned about the footprint left by spun content.

In my mind, I’m thinking if Synnd produces the same results as UAW, then I’ll keep it as it requires far less work than UAW. However, if the opposite is true, then I’ll stay with UAW and work it according to the strategy you’ve outlined above. It clearly requires more effort than Synnd, but if it produces better results in the end then it’s worth it for sure.

If you’ve had any experience with Synnd or at least an educated opinion, I was hoping you could shed some light on it as well.

Thanks,
Paul

When do you want to talk on Skype about LD? I’m not exactly sure when you are on.

My level of disappointment really depends on how much work it takes to get it to that do-follow level. If it takes a LONG time and lots of content, well, I guess I am screwed over and won’t be using hubpages.

Every new post you do, I find myself needing UAW more and more…… You wouldn’t happen to know of any “specials” or discounts for UAW going on, would you? That would be great if you did — but I won’t hold my breath.

I know its not your problem, but im about to get BLS too and these monthly fees keep adding up & up & up.

-Sean

On a side note, your site is now my official “link building resource” got it book marked and am now checking it every day. Keep up the awesome work!

The first attempt at distribution was a total failure, so they informed me that they had some issues with sites in the network and would gladly re-submit our articles for a second time.

Of course we saw the same thing happen with the second attempt. This service is nothing but trouble, my advise is to run not walk away from this service.

Back when I ordered this people were closing out their link wheels, but nowadays people know better and are leaving certain spokes in the wheel open

I saw the linkwheel picture at this post. Please don’t connect the your 1st web 2.0 to the last wheel, as Google can detect the wheel. I always cut the connection from my #1 blog with the last blog.

You can connect the 1-2-3-4-5-6-7 blog but don’t connect again from 7 to 1.

Thank you,
Steven
Steven from Solar Energy Advantages´s last blog ..Solar Energy Advantages

I’m gonna have to pass on web2mayhem and say no, don’t get it. MAN is no longer recommended by me, I can’t testify towards Web2MAyhem’s strength since I never got to try it, but it’s only real value is their network of sites and it costs almost as much as linkvana anyways.

While I don’t think you need anything more than BLS and UAW, I can tell you that Link Dozer is a long term solution that could replace many of the other solutions you’re using now. It’s not very user-friendly though

I always follow your posting in this blog. Did you have final recommendation and the strength of this tool. I saw your blog about the rank of SEO tools
1. BLS (I join thru your link – I think)
2. UAW (already join)
3. Linkvana (no way – high price, and we have to provide blurbs more)
4. MAN (no – I don’t like it)

NEW: EzarticleLink (I also registered thru your link). Please see my email – you will find my lot comment about SEO trick here.

Have you provide new recommendation about those tools?

Thank you,
Steven
Steven from Solar Energy Advantages´s last blog ..Solar Energy Advantages

And when you want to delete all these trackbacks off your site, go to Comments section in WP Admin panel and sort comments by PINGS, and delete them 20-25 at a time, just be careful, because the admin panel reverts backs to displaying Comments, not PINGS after you delete a bunch

Delicious Links,
How To Get Backlinks With Index Driver Sites (guest author post)
and you might want to read up on Twitter Link Wheels, too

You wouldn’t happen to have a page here that says how to do that. I never actually kept track of my links…i just try to build them, though i suppose I should try and start to track and keep better records.

I use UAW, Link Dozer, The Link Juicer and several other services all at once. It’s what I do, test and use and review services.

It’d help if you had some sites that would make more money just by being ranked higher prior to starting out with any link building service.

Can you expand on this process? What are index driver sites? Perhaps the topic of a new post? I am trying to set something like this up and I am not sure on the best method. I believe there is a wso backlink booster that does something similar. If improving your backlinks becomes labor intensive then I think that effort is better spent on creating quality backlinks. Thanks.

Let me know cause I am thinking about buying.

At the moment, what would you recommend more, BLS or Linkdozer? I’m leaning towards BLS myself causes its still your number 1 recommended link building service.

Im a real cheapy when it comes to software and a $100+ a month is no small fee for me — but with what you’ve said about it and the reviews Ive seen, it seems like sound investment, especially for someone with numerous sites.

On a side note, is having both UAW AND Banklink solutions a good idea? Or will one or the other be good enough for backlinks?

Thanks as Usual,

-Sean

Yes, UAW is still #2. I get great results with it, especially when linking to hubs. I sent the link to this post to my UAW Tips newsletter people and some of them were surprised that I would even hint at the fact that it wasn’t working well for people. This tells me that they’re using it effectively and perhaps my newsletter was a part of that, I hope so…

I also don’t see an up-tick in people canceling their UAW memberships, which is yet another tell-tale sign of people still happy with the service. However, the real reason I wrote this post was not to provide a valuable how-to-use-uaw-effectively post (shame on me, right!?) , but to allay people’s fears. Obviously the post will do just that and perhaps even encourage the doubters to get UAW or just stick with it and use it more effectively.

And I still get people emailing me and Skype-ing me thanking me for the BLS recommendations because they’re seeing real positive results with it, even the SEOs who doubted the service but believed enough in me to at least give it a shot.

Thanks for the question,

Dan

This article talks about it some more http://www.davidrisley.com/2009/04/28/don%E2%80%99t-be-a-clickbank-douche/

backlink solutions looks quite promising, is it possible to sign up under my own affiliate link at clickbank(They’re current listed in clickbank marketplace)? Though I would like to sign up under your affliate link, but if I can sign up under my own link, I could save $30 each month…

The only thing I’m not sure is, after I clicked my affliate link, I was directed to an optin form, and I registered as a member from one of the sequence of their emails, and guided to the Renew Subscription page then to the clickbank order page, and I saw my affiliate link was at the order page. So does that mean I will be able to sign up under my affiliate link?

Excuse me if I sound repeative in what I’m saying, as I’ve never signed up anything under my own links…

Thank You.

Nothing new on my end personally with LD since I’ve been sick all week and pretty much too brain-dead to try and work through some parts of the learning curve

Any new information on LD? I am super interested. Even if it takes a learning curve, the idea of it sounds too good to pass up. And this 300 limited memberships thing has got my “mouse happy” and I just want to buy.

Thanks for stopping by,

Dan

Actually after I posted I looked at the seoquake toolbar and you have 136 pages indexed. That really is quite a lot of pages of content.

I can see why you worked on internal linking; it would definitely be worth you while with that many pages.

I’m suprised the related comments plugin can’t be thoroughly relied upon for linking to everything. But I do remember now that Thesis will allow you to create multiple (and not nessarily visible in sidebar) categories that effectively group pages.

Then you can use one of their hook thingies (or is a procedure? can’t remember) to display links to all posts in the category – which you could choose to add to all posts in that category. Basically a better managed version of related posts.

Thanks for stopping by,

Dan

And yes the bigger the sites, the more instances you get where the internal links can pile up making for a nice SEO benefit.

I see a lot less nofollow on the site today About 60% less

Internal linking isn’t something a lot of us are bothered with in IM, because we’re “snipers” – you know we think in terms of narrow keyword choices. 3 or 4 max. Some people target just one.

In that situation, internal linking ain’t going to get you far against someone’s external links.

You probably already know this, but where I’ve seen it really matter is ecommerce stores – there you have the wide semantic net approach that IM marketers don’t have time for.

You know as I think about it here, internal linking is a MONSTER powerful strategy for someone with one a large online store. Products have so many long tail variations that just passing internal link juice around exposes a site to 100s more keywords.

Anyway, thanks again for your site.

Luke – My name’s actually Luke. Not quite sure why I posted as Luca – the Southern European version. My wife’s from there. Perhaps I thought my nofollow comments might offend… Glad they didn’t.

In particular, your idea about re-posting of articles is stellar. I have been re-posting articles in UAW, and have made some minor changes to them before doing so, but now I see, from reading your great explanation, how important it is to make the much more extensive changes that you refer to.

Thanks!
Brigitte Smith´s last blog ..Don’t Allow a Disability to Hold You Back

Same old, same old, it seems.

URL #1, it still dancing around on page 2 same as before

URL #2 is dancing around on pages 5 and 6

My offer still stands to try some new URLs to offer a fair and balanced test

UPDATE: 3/4/2010

Tired of waiting for this test to pan out, still at page 2 here, still a little bit of dancing on page 1. Going to spend about 15minutes generating about 90 backlinks to the test url #1 and I will be page one and climbing up in just a few days. That’s what BLS does.

Link Dozer does a lot of what SE nuke does, it just does it in better ways, and you have free reign on the network of sites they own and control which means your links don’t get messed with, your content remains where it is, there’s no danger of your web 2.0 sites getting killed off due to SE nuke content for links spammy content etc…

There’s a lot under the hood with Link Dozer, bu tit’s a bear to work with

I got your email about ezal, but decided against it after they pulled the cheap lifetime upgrade. I think it’s going to be one giant reciprocal linking/linkwheel farm. =/

About LinkDozer, I haven’t heard anything “special” about it. The “secret” stuff is that it just learns what words you use while spinning articles… there’s already spinner software out there that does that, and the secret places it links to is …. blogs that other people in the system set up. Doesn’t really sound any good to me.

I really appreciate all the testing and hard work that you do and share with us though, thanks!

When you say “from just UAW backlinks” it sounds like you think that potential hundred or so UAW backlinks is not worth much. But they are worth something if your destination urls are positioned well enough to benefit from any amount of types of backlinks, just as long as those backlinks, stick.

Thanks

It’s the newbies who still fall for the “write it and they will link to you” SEO myth.

Naturally obtained links DO occur… IF you already have people reading your stuff and they appreciate it enough to forward a “mention” along somewhere, somehow

After a while you start to see the common failings for a lot of services before you even start using them.

I am using Yoast’s Robots meta plugin for follow attributes “allocation” and it was all good but then I reactivated the Virtual Silo plugin which does something similar but has some extras, too. There may be an issue with one overriding the other. I’m not too worried about it since my new custom Thesis theme will have everything I want for attributes allocation and PR funnelling built into it.

I also use a free plugin called Cross Linker which hyperlinks EVERY single word I dedicate a link to, and this makes for a lot of affiliate links getting hyperlinked so there was more benefit to be gained by decreasing the outbound link juice and NoFollowing all those aff links than there was from DoFollowing all post links.

There’s minimal link juice passed on a site internally from blog post to blog post and while I think that’s important there’s still more SEO value to the iste such as it is, to merely NoFollow on a global navigation level.

Hope that makes sense… MY goal with Virtual Silo plugin was really just to make sure each and every url got connected to the others, but not by using Related Posts since related posts plugins don’t guarantee a connecting link to next post, next category etc… Since this is one of myheavier-trafficked blogs I do some of my testing here. The Virtual Silo plugin got some of my oldest posts re-indexed and ranked better by using “breadcrumb-style” links (to next posts).

Cheers.

Another question…..

How should I handle mass RSS submission software? More specifically, which RSS URL should I input into the software?

I currently use icerocket to create custom feeds and then upload those to feedage right after. Most of my feeds are static feeds which get content from my articles and web 2.0 posts. I’m not trying to build readers so much as I am trying to get more quality backlinks and “intensify” my linking structure — and RSS seems like a fast and easy way to do it.

I noticed I can’t use the feedage URL cause thats a “webpage” according to RSS validators. So, would it be better if I use the icerocket feed URL for mass RSS submission? I know it doesn’t have any “keyword juice” in the url, but I guess I can’t have everything.

I use RSSBOT for my feed submissions. After submitting like 5 feedburner feeds using the software (and now learning that they are no index and no follow), I feel like a real birdbrain — lol.

Okay then, I hope I explained the question thoroughly enough. If not, let me know and I’ll try to elaborate further.

Thanks,

-Sean

P.S. I love your site. Saved me lots of money so far on what i “thought” was great software but turned out to be nothing but garbage with a pretty bow tied on.

P.P.S. A little off topic, but I was wondering if you know of any deals or coupons going on for Unique Article Wizard. $67 a month isn’t a “colossal” expense, but it is a little high for my taste. If you know of any deals, let me know, as I am dieing to get UAW after reading that review you’ve got posted.

But yes, there’s a way to have your cake and eat it, too, if you want to continue building your RSS readership the FB handles that better than anyone else, but it you want to send some constant link juice to another feed hosting entity, then make sure it’s a Dofollow entity.

Blog have RSS, RSS 2.0 an atom feeds so there’s probably a way to send your main feed to FBurner and feedage at the same time without losing link juice or potential RSS readers

“Then he does 10 snippets at a time, makes 200 total and sets them in the the queue system”

how does 10 snippets at a time make 200?

How many words do you do for your snippets? under 100 words?

Am I missing something? Are you supposed to use feedburner AND feedage together?

-Thanks

BLS, UAW, Linkvana, TLJ

If you got the monthly service then start getting your articles out there,

Thanks,

Dan

I already registered the Ezarticlelink today. Waiting your tips about using it. What I have to do now.

Thank,
Hartman

We tried using the free service for the first time, wrote a quality article (and I (Fred) am a highly praised professional article writer and hold a good enough recomendation at Warrior Forum for article writing), spinned to 105% or so and submitted.

We were surprised to get a decline and no way to figure out what’s wrong as well as no way to resubmit the same article from inside the tool using the workflow of the original system in FTS.

We had serious intentions of going for the paid version in the long term, but this is apparently a serious spanner in the wheel.

Could you please clarify?

Thanks,
Fred and Sudeshna

Regards,
Hartman

If you find it too hard to use, you can temporary go back to traditional spinning words and then add the advanced specs to your article.

I’m still working on my first article because of the broken AI which really is slowing me down.

I posted comment in your other blog about Ezarticlelink. As I noted in your other blog you give the rank of backlinks service:
1. BLS
2. UAW
3. Linkvana
4. MAN

Can you please give the update of your rank?

Thank you,
Hartman -
Hartman´s last blog ..Solar Energy Advantages

Regards,
Rushikesh Kamreja

Hmmm, let’s see google knows how its translates content into other languages then back again because…..Google’s the one doing it, so it makes sense they’d figure out what the auto-spun, auto-generated content will look like, then find out who is doing double -translating to create auto-spun content.

As far as other spinning techniques are concerned, I think people spend more WASTED time on spinning articles when they could have just re written their seed article and made it less footprint-detectable.

LFE was a HUGE waste of time, AutoPligg sends garbage links, Bookmarking Demon helps with indexing on content that get sindexed within 3 minutes anyways, big deal…. Good ole’ SEO is good unique content, same as always, not crap content creating a crap site for crap links.

Article Marketing isn’t dead, UAW isn’t dead if people followed my methods for beating this. I’ve outlined what the real footprints are for spun articles, so avoid those footprints and similarities and you’ll see that article marketing is far from dead. It’s just unique content writers like me who win

Beating a dead horse here I know but Google de-indexing spun content is also in the LFE members section. This is members only so I can’t link directly to it. The thread is titled “Blogs not getting indexed/Not getting any results”.

Members have offered a solution that is very similar to what SENuke’s owner has recommended and appears to be VERY labor intensive.

Is this the death of article marketing?

Yes, BLS has my video on their site. Colin told me it might be a temporary thing since he’ll be doing some new videos soon. I will email you something tomorrow that is an add-on to what I already sent you.

Regarding LD stuff, I haven’t got far with it yet, have been super-busy with a new project and sick part of the week, too. You definitely need all your wits about you to use Link Dozer.

The links I/we get with BLS stick just fine if you do some spinning

I sent the video and some “best practices” to the email address you used in this comment form field.

About knowing the locations of the links you’ll be getting from BLS, just check your pingbacks, trackbacks, cPanel AWStats, Yahoo Site Explorer etc… or Google your snippet titles

Cheers
Adam

What email address did you send it to? Gmail?

Footprints that define spun articles are:

article length (all these “similar” articles are 560-565 words each),
text blocks length (paragraphs length),
# of text blocks/paragraphs (same for all articles?),
same links in article (all these similar articles use same anchor text),
and rate at which these all come out, get indexed

Regards..
Ric´s last blog ..How to Boost Google Adsense Income

You may wanna look at this. SENuke forum is also commenting on spinning. The owner has released a new video about it. It appears Google can now figure out if articles are spun. This would explain the UAW comment.

I can tell it’s a made for backlinking services such as UAW, MAN, Senuke, Linkdozer, ezarticles, BLS, etc.

Still though… what would make the service even better is the ability to ask the writers to be able to write any types of articles on any niches, topics, etc.

Now that would be an awesome…

Spin articles begin with the original article, and then words or sentences are rearranged to produce multiple unique articles. This way you can have many articles that stem from the original one. You can use software on the internet to spin your articles. The outcome from these software tools are many times not readable. The reason for this is that the software just creates synonyms for the words, which means you may get an article back that is hard to read. So far there is no software that can compete with the human mind. Another option, instead of using a software tool, is to have a human rewrite the article.

They are written by real people who are able to think about the article and write it.

These articles are then interesting, unique, and easy to read. After you have written the article, you will be able to have it spun in many different ways and then put it on sites, increasing the amount of backlinks you get and pushing you higher up in the search engine rankings. These articles are also good to use on your own website to update it regularly with unique content, keeping up with what search engines like Google like. The amount of effort required to continually produce well written articles is time consuming. So what is a simple way to get the results you want? That’s easy; all you have to do is log on to The Leading Articles and get the people there to spin articles for you.

You will be supplied with a high quality article, perfect for spinning, every day including weekends. There is a team of writers employed by this service and the must create high quality articles that have to pass a copyscape test and be at least 500 words. Most of their articles pertain to Internet marketing, and Clickbank, or product review articles. Such a high number of variations can be produced, so they call it the Ultra Spinnable Articles Service. The writers manually rewrite each sentence 5 times and each paragraph 5 times. This will give an awe inspiring 116,415,321,826,934,814,453,125 variations from a seed article. Membership to this site is limited to 300 people, so each of the members will be able to acquire as many articles as they want.

In SEO you always have to adapt in order to remain ahead of things. There have been some changes that affected UAW and its users, but only those who didn’t use it wisely.

Use the rotating random resource boxes, up to 17 of them

Don’t link directly to main sites, but to link wheel spokes that aren’t closed , but open -ended. One article submitted via UAW and linking to 17 different web properties/spokes of a link wheel will create a nice solid web ring of content.

I think it’s a good thing that the changes have been made, and seen because it is always good SEO to have a lot of high quality sites linking into yours even if they are DoFollow Web 2.0 properties you don’t own and control.

These web 2.0 properties don’t need a lot of links in order to rank well, therefore the vast number and wide dispersion of links obtainable from UAW is perfect for this.

As far as what’s new for Google’s valuing of sites? Same as always, good content getting linked to by good sites with good content

I’ve only been reading your site for a few weeks, but I find your commentary quite interesting. I don’t subscribe to many sites these days, am looking forward to future articles.

Regards…

Dan

Not sure if I am allowed to tell you whether Link Dozer has this or not, but suffice to say that I won’t be needing The Best Spinner any time soon.

Thanks for the feedback,

Dan

Regarding your comment:

“The Best spinner does synonym replacements, and doesn’t come close to what Link Dozer’s spinner does, although it is similar in one area.”

The best spinner actually does phrase replacements. It seems to depend on what users save as their “favorites”. So if a user saves a replacment that’s an entire phrase it would be available to other users.

Is this something that LD offers? Or maybe you can’t say?

Anyway, thanks for the solid review. Looking forward to your results. though I’m probably going to pick up LD soon anyway. Looks like it’s at least worth the $97/month.

Mike