Link Building Strategies

Here’s some link building tips, ideas, and strategies that I decided to write up to address questions (and concerns) from people who purchase certain link building services then ask for strategy help, or want to know what my tips or “secrets” are for using these tools and services to maximum effect.

So if you were promised a Unique Article wizard bonus, BLS secrets, Linx Boss strategy help, or help with any currently recommended link building service, this is the right page to be on.

If you haven’t purchased any or all of these services or tools yet then this page should help educate you beyond just what a service does, and whether it does “it” well or not.

The educated consumer is a powerful and happy consumer, so let’s get started with some terms you should be familiar with and their roles in effective SEO…

  • (External) Tiered linking, AKA Getting Links to your backlinks
  • Profiles links AKA Angela links, AKA Xrumer-like spam links
  • Web 2.0 – and it’s role in link building
  • Money sites
  • Satellites, parasites

Money sites and main sites- these are ALWAYS , ALWAYS,  ALWAYS your priority when striving for top rankings.

You don’t want your articles on article directories outranking content on your money sites, and same thing applies for any tier 2 entities like Web 2.0 hubpages, squidoo lenses etc….

Remember this as it is crucial to your SEO success!…

Your goal is not to have your content on other’s virtual properties out-ranking your own, but to get your own content self-hosted on your own sites ranked highest (at some point).

This is not SEO “theory” merely common sense…. I know that you want to see some high ranked articles and such when you’re first starting out, and trying to create some article marketing traffic, so YES it is OK if you rank your articles first, as long as they link to your money site in DoFollow manner and if you keep in mind that your money sites allow you more freedom with your content therefore more conducive to making conversions and earning those dollars.

Tiered linking: there’s external and internal tiered linking and most searches I’ve done for the term tiered linking referred to internal cross linking on sites, or site architecture, but in this particular space, tiered linking means external linking patterns, AKA the design and organizational structure of your inbound linking profile, AKA your link juice build up, AKA your… ok that’s enough “AKAs” I hope you get the point here.

Traditionally, link building meant direct linking from one entity to your main site, your money site, and article marketing was the primary whitehat way to do this, aside from reciprocal linking, but with the advent of all the “Web 2.0″ sites that soon became authority sites trusted highly by the search engines, these became great places from which to obtain links from, and also a great place to send backlinks to (more on this later…).

The smart/intermediate/proficient link building knows that direct linking to one’s money sites is a rather self-limiting exercise because you will end up running out of entities to direct link from, unless you find other entities to direct link juice towards.

When doing external tiered linking you’re doing something like the following:

Shitty links >>> crappy links >>> less crappy sites linking to >>> your money sites

Tier 3 and 4 and 5 Shitty links – Xrumer, WPMUs, LFE urls, low level article directories——

Tier 2 entities- hubpages, squidoos lenses, good article directories like articlesbase, goarticles, ezinearticles, guest posts on relevant highly trusted sites

Web 2.0 sites – First off I gotta rant a little bit about the term “Web 2.0″, which was originally a type of technology, which came to have a certain design associated with it, then it became associaitive with certain kind sof sites, which then became known as Web 2.0 sites, but I’ll play along here and continue to call the following types of sites, Web 2.0 sites, to name just a few: HubPages, Squidoo, Vox, Twitter, wordpress.com

The role of Web 2.0s in link building- Most of the tier 2 Web 2.0s you want to be creating are on high Page Ranked domains but more importantly, are aged, trusted entities that enjoy high search engine trust, and most importantly to the end users, they’re easy to create, and publish content to.

Since these are entities that can contain your keywords you’re targeting you can create keyword optimized “web 2.0 sites” to rank for certain terms, but you can also funnel link juice through them, on towards your money sites.  That’s what you want to do at some point when your understanding of how link building works goes beyond the minimal direct linking and advances beyond that towards what could be considered the next step in your SEO-volution.

Let me re-emphasize that it is SOLID SEO to direct link to your sites form the more trusted entities first, (at first) then once your site has enough of these trusted links pointing to them, to then consider expanding outwards into doing crappier links to your tier 2 entities and money sites…

But for now let’s just expand outwardly, slowly and consider as hypothetical fact that you:

  • have a money site
  • have some Dofollow Web 2.0 entities built
  • are linking to money sites form the Web 2.0s

So, let’s say you build some lenses and hubs and other DoFollow entities, how do you pass link juice to them?

Well, that’s where, the lesser quality links and sites come into play.

Blog networks are chock full of lower quality sites, but in many cases the sites linking to you are related niche sites so they can we used for direct linking to money sites and towards the Tier 2 entities.

But for those blog networks that have all the posts in general categories on sites whose purpose is solely to link farm out to others’ sites, then it’s best to use these to link from here to your tier 2 sites, but there’s no harm in direc tlinking to money sites either.

Hope this last part doesn’t confuse you, I’m just stating what BEST practice would be, whilst also adding that there’s no penalty for direct linking to money sites from crappy blog network sites.

Parasites and WPMUS - parasites are basically places you place links on or place content fo rlinks on for sole purpose of obtaining backinks.

Guestbooks, fake hreferrer spam (if you don’t know what this is, you don’t wana know), forum profile links, WPMUs… these are all pretty much parasite entities since you’re creating accounts there to bleed off the link juice and authorit yof the sites, not add quality to them.

WPMUs are wordpress multi user sites, a particular type of WordPress installation that allows fo rremote registrations on a subdomain, a new blog installation on said domain and these are used for either

1- adding quality content to that particular community

2- adding content there for sole purpos eo f”parasiting” (most used practice, really)

What makes parasites low quality, low level entities for link building is they basically become quasi link farms that contain crap spun content and link out to whatever they can link out to (when used by ahem.. “SEO spammers”).  since there’s no quality content on these WPMUs usually, and no real attempt to interact with the readers, these entities end up becoming link farm-like creations as I mentioned earlier; linking out way more than they get linked to, and used mostly for pushing and funneling and harvesting link juice as part of the tiered linking mechanism.

NOTE: There’s a TON of parasite entities out there, and these are definitely not restricte dot just WPMUs but they’re a pretty good example of parasites.

Parasites are to be used for linking to your backlinks and while some people say it’s best practice to NOT link directly to money sites from here, you can and will get away with it once you’ve established enough quality backlinks already.

When doing external tiered linking you’re doing something like the following:

Shitty links >>> crappy links >>> less crappy sites linking to >>> your money sites

Tier 3 and 4 and 5 Shitty links – Xrumer, WPMUs, LFE urls, low level article directories——

Tier 2 entities- hubpages, squidoos lenses, good article directories like articlesbase, goarticles, ezinearticles, guest posts on relevant highly trusted sites.

Why all this talk about tiered linking and linking to your backlinks?

When using article syndication services, AKA blog networks to syndicate content for purpose of direct traffic and backlinks, you will at some point have your content hosted-and-posted on the same sites, therefore it just makes sense to have another ring of optimized web entities to direct your links toward.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

  • Try not to get overwhelmed here with all this talk of tiered linking, thinking that you need 100s of thousands of links to do link building effectively.
  • If direct linking from article directories and blog networks does the trick for you then do ONLY THAT.
  • If you have more tools at your disposal and need to create more link juice from/to more web entities then expand outward as needed.

With this long pre-amble in mind, and hopefully well-absorbed… the following should make more sense:

Best practices for using the services I deem as most effective and trustworthy (not trying to sound all high and mighty here, either, just sharing some tips and hoping they serve you well)

 

How Best To Use Linx Boss

Here’s how I like to use Linx Boss: I focus on the main domain urls entered into the system, as that is the most reliable effects that I’ve seen with using this service.  They have a feature called L4L that should get L4L Links 4 links, meaning that if you have links to your site already, PRe-LinxBoss, then LinxBoss will find them and link to them.  Since I haven’t seen a lot of definitive positive effects form using L4l, I don’t really try to focus too much on this aspect of their service and merely use the main ingredient, which is to rank domain urls for their main keywords, sub-keywords and what-not…

If you have an inner url that you want to rank for a certain term, but are finding it difficult, here’s my thoughts on that; if your keyword is that difficult it should have been included in the domain name and if not, then get an EMD (exact match domain), register it and build a few quality backlinks to the EMD.

Building out a slew of EMD mini-sites to create a mini-net is more of a high-powered tier linking mechanism, and it explained here in this post on mini-net mini site building

With LinxBoss I like to focus on ranking up my main keywords for the domains entered into the system, then if and when a keyword reaches page 1, top 3 position, I may remove it form the keyword list getting anchor text links, in order to create less of a dilution factor in the anchor text backlinks LB is getting to that site.

In other words, if you put 3-4 keywords in for the campaign, and one reaches a plateau point, then remove it and allow more links to come in percentage-wise for the other terms, then when those terms are in top 3, if they ever rank that high, then make a another tweak, and maybe add in another inner url and associative keyword and let LB maintain your rankings whilst working the other inner url, too.

NOTE: Even though LB is a hands-off solution, that doesn’t mean you should do nothing else for those sites for those terms, since the more you do to help LB work your stuff, the sooner you can attain higher rankings, and the sooner you can put another campaign IN and rotate one of your initial URLS OUT.

How Best To Use Backlink Solutions – (currently off “recommended” list, replaced by Build My Rank)

Since you only get 1000 links a month with them, target medium to long tail terms and inner urls of your site.  When you create snippets in B.L.S. you’ll see 3 areas where you can put urls and keywords, so link to 3 different urls per snippet, and when these hit the network they’ll provide only one link, so you’ll be diluting your efforts here but also changing up what gets hyperlinked, what gets linked to and basically will be hitting entities like EMDs, main money sites, hubs, lenses, EZA articles etc…

When linking to the aforementioned web real estate, use different keywords in your snippets and get them ranked for those long tail or medium tail terms, then link from those entities to your money sites using more competitive terms, and link to your money sites from your snippets to main site use more competitive keywords.

How to generate 1000 scheduled, drip-feed links in 3 hours or so…

#1, you’ll be creating about 90-120 snippets per snippets-spin, so this means all you have to do is write 10 60-word-mimum blurbs, then spin them really well, then create 90-120 snippets for each, then schedule them to go out at a BLS-recommended 20/day frequency rate, which really doesn’t mean 20/day, but is just the way they recommend you do things, so just do it this way.

#2- Go to ezinearticles.com, and use their search feature, and type in keyword one you’re looking for content for.  A lis tof articles will be returned to you, so go find an article that has your keyword in there and paste it into the snippets creation section as part 1 of your snippet.  Do this twice more for kws 2 and 3, and spin the articles, and then submit them.

No, its not duplicate content if you’re using 3 different paragraphs from 3 different articles, to assemble a totally unique snippet blurb, plus…once you spin this assembled blurb, it will be even more unique.

How Best To Use Build My Rank

#1- This can be a labor intensive service to use, but the links are good, your work is not wasted, and you can always use the articles you wrote for BMR syndication elsewhere.

#2- Re-purpose your BMR articles/snippets to other services after your articles have gone out to their network for a week or so…

#3- You really can do some damage here with just a few links, but I wouldn’t get lazy with this and expect miracles, so do at least 10 articles/url you want links for, and focus on terms you think you’ll see results with sooner rather than later, like linking up web 2.0 sites or articles, or anything that only needs a few links to get a quick boost in the SERPs.

#4- Don’t worry about finding your links in backlinks checkers, just focus on submitting more content for syndication, and make 100% sure your on-page SEO is up to snuff, or you’re just wasting your time, as would be the case with any other service you might use.

#5- Take the approach of “backlink sniping”, ie… hitting some urls with long tail anchor text to get results quickly, then focus on bringing more urls to page 1 but for higher search volume terms (non-long-tails).

#6- This bears repeating…  10 articles per url

How Best To Use UAW- more to come, but here’s some placeholder content to help things along in meantime

Unique Article Wizard – This post addresses whether or not UAW is still effective and shows how to use it effectively

Unique Article Wizard Case Study – This post on a different site of mine shows how to do well for a product launch whilst ranking for easy terms and taking up lotsa Page 1 space.

This automated indexing tool here, in my opinion… is necessary to get to achieve better results with Unique Article Wizard

 

{ 44 comments… read them below or add one }

Sean August 25, 2010 at 11:26 am

Hello Dan,

If you were promoting 200 keywords by just using Uaw would you rewrite them over and over to avoid having to create 200 fresh and unique articles month in month out?

Would you spin each 1+2 over and over and put them into different keyword categories,change title,anchor text and paragraph length.

How do you go about finding the many keyword categories…Ezine?

Sean

Reply

robert August 25, 2010 at 1:20 pm

This is awesome, thanks dan. I sent you an email after my purchase of BS on how to get the snippets done effectively, with this writeup you have overdelivered. Many thanks.

On another note I have one question, if you would be kind enough to answer. For UAW whats the quickest most efficient way to get articles done considering I have the best spinner at hand.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Reply

robert August 25, 2010 at 1:58 pm

oh. Sorry one more thing. For the BS links I take it that you are using paragraphs from ezines as your base then spinning them 90 -120 times?

Just seemed confusing as you have that as step 2 rather than step 1.

Reply

MediaBox August 29, 2010 at 11:01 am

hi Dan,

i would like to invite you on a JV if your are interested please email me

Reply

Daniel McGonagle August 30, 2010 at 9:11 am

replied via email

Reply

HZL September 1, 2010 at 4:13 pm

Do you have any experience with Magic Submitter?

Would be great to hear your take on it.

Thanks.

Reply

Paul Clarke September 6, 2010 at 10:55 am

I have experience with Aleks Krulik’s Magic Submitter.
I will say up front that it is a tool with a great deal of potential. The ability to add your own sites to it is a real winner (similar to Sick Submitter I suppose)
But it comes with too few sites as standard, and many of those need fixing “out of the box” including (during the time I was a subscriber) Ezine. Squidoo and others that really should just “work”. These are your bread and butter sites, no way so many of them should fail (due to sign up syntax problems I might add, not “time outs” or other web related errors. I was continually getting errors of the “password field not found” or “unable to locate captcha” sort.)

The advise I got was “you can fix this by…” and a few lines telling me how the macro programming system worked.

I make link rings on a weekly basis (all unique content so mostly a WH exercise really GH at worst) and was hoping that this tool could be a real time saver for account creation and content posting.
Given that I only make 6-8 spoke rings, I find that imacros and a few other free tools lets me do the whole thing a lot quicker.

Also I like to add profiles, photo’s etc to the WEB2.0 sites I join up to (adds credibility etc) Out of the box MS does the very bare minimum.

I think this tool has a great future if handled well, but for now I will stick with Imacros and some very nice form filling in software I bought from Warrior forums. It allows me to join most sites in under 60 seconds, and that’s good enough for me.

So the issue is, the great tools you should be using to add functionality to a stable system are instead used to correct the basic functionality of that system

If I was to get anything to do this, then I might go the Sick route and buy some profile packs. Really don’t want to be bothered with adding “software maintenance for third party SEO solutions” to the list of tasks I already do
In case you were wondering..
I would not consider the Senuke route. The web holdings it posts to are too limited for a tool that costs such a lot per month. I was a subscriber for almost 2 years, and saw that although they work hard keeping the functionality “clean” and fix sign up and submission errors quickly – the limitations of the keyword tool, the very basic nature of the spinner, and the paucity of sites that it allows you to post to mean that I was suffering from diminishing returns month by month. By now most of the sites outside the “big” few are little more than “spam hutches” with the PR of several of them in rapid decline.

Good places to visit if you need to lose weight, buy viagra or play warcraft though :-)

Paul

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 6, 2010 at 11:54 am

I heard that Magic had potential, too. I’m just not a big fan of using standalone tools versus services since it ends up causing me to deal with a learning curve, bugs, new account creations, etc…

Re. SE Nuke… I think you’re nuts bud… :) there’s no other service nor tool that submits to more Web 2.0s than SE Nuke, not SERP Assist nor Link Builders Pro, that’s for sure

Reply

Paul Clarke September 6, 2010 at 12:36 pm

Fair enough. I’ll go along with that to some extent. I wasn’t clear, and Nuke is certainly a very good tool as far as account creation and submission goes.

It’s paying a premium for the other stuff that I really do object to. Keyword tool (very average) spinner (as basic as it gets)

As a stand alone web2.0 tool I’d pay $60 a month for it. By the end of my time though, that was the only value the whole Nuke suite was giving me I had replaced every other aspect of the software with better alternatives

Sick Sub and a decent pack does roughly the same for 1/6th of the cost.(It has some of the same issues as MS mind you)

As a beginner tool, or for those who like everything organised under one roof, then Nuke is a good tool. But with other stuff banging on the door and competing in terms of this applications main functionality for a fraction of the cost, then, once you have bought a better keyword tool, a better spinner and found good free RSS submission tools and such like, then it really all comes down to WEB2.0 account creation and submission

For my money, for a slightly more experienced IMer then Nuke struggles to offer value. Good though it is, there are tools that do the same thing cheaper.

On that – a big fan of totally free stuff like imacros’s and Duke’s form filler (I don’t think Duke owns it any more but Roboform for those who haven’t got a copy) together you can really go to town and work almost as fast as any bought solution for a small initial cost of a few tens of dollars, then more or less free.

I could waffle on about having all your favourite WEB2.0 sign up URL’s tabbed in Firefox, Foxyproxy swapping your IP, cache cleaner hoovering your history, and then Roboform and Imacros, hammering in the data..and it all costing nothing and taking maybe 5 minutes to set up full profiles on 10 or twelve WEB2.0 properties for little or no cash.

I could say that..but I won’t (sorry couldn’t resist that)

No seriously Nuke is a good tool. I was a little harsh. For beginners who want a catch all solution, then it is as good as they get. Areeb and I have had some heated debates on this a few weeks ago on NUkes forum, and I conceded that it is probably the best all in one SEO tool available, though I don’t like the “all in one” tag myself.

However, once you know your way around the web, and know what you can get for free, or for a one of price, then with a little knowledge (and some organization) it can be beaten in terms of performance, and most tellingly – price.

I suppose it’s the time it takes to get that knowledge that kills most people. I read somewhere (here maybe – probably in many different places, pretty certain it’s a common stat) that 90%+ of IM’s never make $100 and quit inside a year.

a tool like Nuke is always going to have a place helping these guys. The risk is that some may never learn the “nuts and bolts” and become truly adaptable IMers. Once the crutch of a system like Nuke is removed, then many of these guys and gals might be back at the start knowing very little about the process.

So (thanks to your comment, and me thinking about it for a few minutes – how fickle I am) I now endorse Nuke for new IMers. As a subsciber for almost 2 years I know the product inside out, and it is a very well maintained piece of kit. Very rarely fails on sign ups or submissions and provides novice IMers with “just about” everything they need in one place.

If I was a novice IMer I would be delighted with it as a recommendation, but I would definitely look to keep increasing my knowledge of all things web based outside of Nuke.

Hope that all comes across as fair?

Paul Clarke

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 6, 2010 at 12:56 pm

Cool beans man, no worries, I accept all friend requests and differing points of view and opinions. :)

I did and am still doing the Sick routine, ordered over 100 dollars in packets, had outsourced the creations and what-not, and still far less valuable than ordering an Xrumer blast., as the lists are small even after ordering a few links packets but rather economical if these are continually bought and added to Sick software, akin to buying Xrumer DBs once every few months, too though.

There’s some stuff coming out that will be better than SE nuke and for less price, but SE Nuke is still a powerhouse tool in the right hands. As you can see I don’t talk about it much on this site though, since I don’t want to send people down a dark road of high expectations when the tools a PC resource hogs, and still buggy.

I think you’re on the right path though, you’re finding out what works, you’re being economical, getting your own toolset together etc…but I value my time greatly and will also splurge on services like LinxBoss that merely require some keywords and urls and waiting…

When you’re making decent income the costs don’t really matter, but saving time and sanity does, capische?

Reply

Paul Clarke September 6, 2010 at 1:19 pm

I’m making barely more than my old “normal” job, so I’m more “time rich” than “cash rich” at the mo’
Good point – well made. Scaling up is vital once the balance changes if you want to keep progressing. And that costs.
There are things I know I could earn more cash doing (errm like stuff involving Craigs list if you get my drift) but never appealed to me.
I’ll keep on trucking – catch you later man

Reply

HZL September 6, 2010 at 2:42 pm

To clarify… which tool would be preferred, if choosing just one: Magic Submitter of SEnuke?

Thanks.

Reply

Paul Clarke September 7, 2010 at 2:27 am

I’ll jump in here as an ex user of both (sorry).
For stability and ease of use (and essp if you don’t have a dedicated keyword tool) I would go for nuke – but look to drop it once your SEO skill set improves and you find better/cheaper ways to link.
If MS gets off it’s ass it may well end up as better value, but it needs too much work “out of the box” to make it a viable proposition for anyone other than those willing to spend a lot of time fixing its basic functionality.
Both are best employed in making high quality link rings, but neither does the job as completely or as accurately as I would like.

Reply

Buddy September 7, 2010 at 5:25 pm

I thought I already posted this…Dan, in BLS are you saying do 1 anf 2 or 1 or 2?

Buddy

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 7, 2010 at 5:35 pm

Hey Buddy I deleted the comment because it didn’t make much sense to me

Reply

Buddy September 7, 2010 at 5:41 pm

Oh, sorry.
Where you talk about the link building process (in BLS) are you saying write your own article to spin and re-purpose Ezine articles or those are two ways of doing the same thing?
Does that make better sense?

Buddy

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 7, 2010 at 7:24 pm

I was saying, re-purpose EZA if you can’t think of anything to write about, just grab 3 paragraphs form 3 different articles, or just write 60-100 original words and spin them

Reply

John September 14, 2010 at 10:50 pm

Hi Dan,
@ Paul,

Great post and feedback,

You seem pretty clued up guy’s so I wanted to bounce an architecture question off you both.

I want to build a solid back linking solution for myself and my new SEO clients.

I would like to build a design that is robust and produces results ongoing. It has to be white hat, not black or grey. im thinking that having a private aged domain a layer tier will provide protection from spam, slpogs etc..

I’m thinking of a 4 tier architecture
Tier 4>>Tier 3>>Tier 2 Private>> Tier 1 Money Site

Tier 2 Private aged domains Wordpress & rss optimiser, quality articles

Tier 3 (WPMU???) low quality articles (can you autoblog on these?)

Tier 4 (Profiles – Xrumer???)

I’m interested in your view on the above architecture and how tier 3 & 4 would work with available tools, techniques and your experienced knowledge.

What is the best suggested architecture and tools I should invest my “limited budget” in?

Cheers,
John

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 14, 2010 at 11:43 pm

I’m thinking of a 4 tier architecture
Tier 4>>Tier 3>>Tier 2 Private>> Tier 1 Money Site

Tier 2 Private aged domains WordPress & rss optimiser, quality articles

Tier 3 (WPMU???) low quality articles (can you autoblog on these?)

Tier 4 (Profiles – Xrumer???)

I’m interested in your view on the above architecture and how tier 3 & 4 would work with available tools, techniques and your experienced knowledge.

That’s pretty good, u need an indexing network, too though. Read this, this will help with some of what you’re planning

Also, at some point you can use Xrumer to every url on every tier, once sites are aged enough and have enough links so they don’t get blasted into oblivion.

Reply

Dr.Mani September 18, 2010 at 11:46 pm

I’ve spent over 2 hours on your site, reading about the different link building services you recommend/reviewed, and your strategy document on linking, and wanted to say a huge big ‘Thank You’ for making all this available in one location on the Web.

It has been an informative and instructive time, well worth investing, and what you have shared will be of immense help in guiding me on the right tools to buy to implement my strategy. It has been quite a while since I studied SEO related stuff, and this was a very nice ‘refresher course’ :)

I will be sure to let many people know about the value you provide. If there’s anything I can do to help you, please ask.

Thanks again, Daniel.

All success
Dr.Mani

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 19, 2010 at 9:18 am

Dr.Mani, like to see you dropping by. I know you’ve done some charity work in the past, and I DO have a charity that’s sponsoring me for the Boston Marathon, maybe you could give me some pointer on fund raising?

Reply

Dr.Mani September 19, 2010 at 9:28 am

Would be delighted to. Drop me a quick email with details, and I’ll do my best to help. :-)

Reply

Paul Clarke September 19, 2010 at 1:56 pm

Multi tiered is good. I find the higher PR article sites are a great second tier to the web ring strategy.
I look for PR7+ for the closest tier, then 5+ for the next, then pretty much anything after that
isnare, ezine,alley,go,dashboard and a few others have decent PR (for the site anyway – not neccessarily your article URL) and make a very good second step. A decent article submitter that includes a bunch of PR5+ sites is a good investment. Boost these views, bookmark them, and backlink the articles.
Third tier for me is a “garbage” tier. any inks I can find just get chucked in.
Having a well established Ezine account with hundreds of articles on is well worth the investment at the moment.

Scritty

Reply

Paul Clarke September 19, 2010 at 2:15 pm

Notice Dan has sort of endorsed article marketing robot on another thread.
I second that with bells on – the best 80 bucks I’ve spent in months. Whereas my previous efforts were either;
a) good at sending 500+ to spammy sites (a la Traffic mania) or
b) able to send to a couple of hundred sites including the decent ones – when the software was maintained well enough for this all to work…

AMR has over 1300 – including all the big names, plenty of PR3-PR6 sites, great success rates on both sign up and submission The site I whacked in this profile was a domain I bought 4 weeks ago -and started actually promoting last week – this tool has already made me the cash I invested in it back..

Not sure if this was the place to mention this – but the best stand alone tool I’ve bought since micro niche finder (which paid for itself in a week as well) :-)

Reply

Kishore Parankusam September 26, 2010 at 8:04 am

Dan you mentioned in BuildMyRank best practices above, 10 links per URL. Have you got good results in your tests with just 10 links per URL?

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 26, 2010 at 8:38 am

Hi Kishore, you’re the one who mentioned that, not me (I think). For my most recent BMR test, I’ve submitted 40 links to a specific url in less than a month so the 10 links/url might be a daily cap, not a weekly nor monthly cap.

Reply

Kishore Parankusam September 26, 2010 at 8:48 am

Yes, in the BMR faq it is mentioned “up to 10 posts daily per domain.”

And Dan, In BMR Best Practices above you mentioned –
“#3- You really can do some damage here with just a few links,” and
“#6- This bears repeating… 10 articles per url”

I was asking about this. Did you see results by just getting 10 articles per url for some of your keywords?

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 26, 2010 at 4:09 pm

What I was trying to emphasize there was,

” a few links might help you rank where you want, just don’t be stingy and do like 2 links per url, but instead make sure you send 10 links per url” you want ranked up, linked up

Reply

Audrey September 28, 2010 at 1:56 pm

Daniel,
I’m a little confused on how I should be choosing my anchor text keywords for my tiers. For example, say I want to rank my money site for the keyword “laptop bag reviews”.

First Tier (my money site)

Second Tier (ezinearticles, hubpages, squidoo, goarticles) – each article’s topic would be on laptop bags, with a link to my money site using the anchor text “laptop bags reviews”.

Third Tier (low quality articles like from UAW) – articles published via UAW that contain links to my second tier articles. However, this is where I’m confused. Should my anchor text be “laptop bag reviews”, or something else related to the second tier articles?

Fourth Tier (crappy links like XRumer Blasts) – profile links that link back to my UAW articles. Again, I’m confused on what my anchor text should be.

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 28, 2010 at 6:12 pm

Audrey you have every right to be confused.

Those who write and speak about tiered/layered linking don’t really all agree on what anchor text should be.

There’s several reasons for this, one main one being that sometimes you could write a general article with general article topic of “starting a new project car” but your anchor links are for MOPAR parts, so you eventually want to rank for MOPAR Parts, but seeing as how article title is “start new project car” then that doesn’t make much sense. This can get confusing… do you rank the articles for the titles, or just send generic meaningless anchor text to them.

What’s the goal of tiered linking, total niche domination with every hub, lens, and article being top ranked for the keywords in the title?

Or is the goal to merely send “link juice” AKA a slew of backlinks…. to all your tiers so they have some “oomph!” behind them?

I recommend hybrid approach of trying to rank your 1st tier (1 link away from money site) for main or sub-main or long tail keywords, and as for other deeper tiers, just send whatever anchor text you can to them without extra effort.

Reply

markowe June 12, 2011 at 5:59 am

I like to do this:

1 – money site, exact keywords – “red ladies’ hats”
2 – 1st tier, (web 2.0 etc.) – stuff about “ladies’ hats” in general, with anchors texts to tier 1 containing “red ladies’ hats”. As long as I never plan to target “ladies’ hats” in general, of course.
3 – 2nd tier, (e.g. AMR) – articles about “hats”, with “ladies’ hats” in anchor text of links to Tier 1
4 – well, if I bother with a 3rd tier then anchor text can be “hats” and the content can be just about anything you can wangle the word “hats” into :) . This tier is more about indexing the backlinks anyway.

That makes your “pyramid” increasingly contextual and avoids the danger of your BL properties outranking your money site, too. At the moment this seems to be an effective strategy which takes some of the overthinking out of things, for me anyway.

Reply

markowe June 12, 2011 at 6:11 am

P.S. Of course in step 2 I meant “anchor texts to money site”, not tier 1. And would also like to add thanks for this overview and to suggest it would be nice to see some discussion about AMR best practices too, as it seems this is still a powerful tool, but people seem to be seeing diminishing returns with it, possibly due to the methods they are using. I am still a little in two minds, and am waiting for some results to come in, but can’t see how one can go wrong with all those hundreds of easily-gained backlinks, provided you leverage them right.

Reply

Audrey September 28, 2010 at 9:13 pm

Thanks so much for the clarification, Daniel! I’m going to try the hybrid approach as you recommended.

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 29, 2010 at 12:02 am

You’re welcome, anytime

Reply

Paul Clarke September 29, 2010 at 8:42 am

I don’t really go more than 3 tiers deep (unless you count pure bookmarks I suppose) It can get very confusing. I mean the PR from a decent profile set up in Xrumer is not going to be much more or less than a link from one of the cookie cutter PR0 sites that UAW submits to. Which one google ranks”higher” is anyones guess.

Reply

Jim Furr November 8, 2010 at 6:29 pm

Hi, Thanks for the run down on Link build/tiers, etc.

Question:

#1
I want to offer a Back linking tool(s) recommendation for my members (monetized, blog building membership)

#2
I need a tool(s) so I can offer a back linking service to members who want it done for them

Hope that is clear,

Jim >

Reply

Matthew November 9, 2010 at 4:35 pm

Hi Dan,

Sorry about posting this here. Would you be willing to add a “recent comments” widget in your sidebar? I like to see what others are saying and if I’m not subscribed to that post it makes it difficult.

Thanks.

Reply

Micky December 13, 2010 at 2:57 pm

Can anyone elaborate on this comment by Paul Clarke:

I could waffle on about having all your favourite WEB2.0 sign up URL’s tabbed in Firefox, Foxyproxy swapping your IP, cache cleaner hoovering your history, and then Roboform and Imacros, hammering in the data..and it all costing nothing and taking maybe 5 minutes to set up full profiles on 10 or twelve WEB2.0 properties for little or no cash.

…actually I understand that part about using roboform and imacros but I’m wondering about FoxyProxy and Cache Cleaner. I imagine if you’re going to be creating link wheels and social bookmarking tons of different pages and stuff you would need to change proxies every now and then but I can’t find any information on this…. like when do you change proxies and how exactly do you do it?

Thanks!

Reply

Eda May 12, 2011 at 12:14 pm

If I was to get anything to do this, then I might go the Sick route and buy some profile packs. Really don’t want to be bothered with adding “software maintenance for third party SEO solutions” to the list of tasks I already doIn case you were wondering..I would not consider the Senuke route. The web holdings it posts to are too limited for a tool that costs such a lot per month. I was a subscriber for almost 2 years, and saw that although they work hard keeping the functionality “clean” and fix sign up and submission errors quickly – the limitations of the keyword tool, the very basic nature of the spinner, and the paucity of sites that it allows you to post to mean that I was suffering from diminishing returns month by month. By now most of the sites outside the “big” few are little more than “spam hutches” with the PR of several of them in rapid decline.
+1

Reply

Paul Clarke May 12, 2011 at 3:45 pm

@ Eda.
Notice you’ve quoted me, assuming you are not a “spam bot” in disguise. In which case an italicized quote with +1 on the end is “genius simple”….

I did indeed try Sick out, and though I would certainly not discount Sick – I’d suggest perhaps having a look at some other solutions.
Most of the programming I have done in SS has required a lot of fiddle and mess, and many of the packets I’ve tried fall over of had a failure rate higher than I would have liked (with private proxies and good captcha service as well)
The conclusion I have reached is that profile spamming and web2.0 creation is not the issue at all.
It’s getting a decent mix of links from many sources and getting them securely indexed.
Creating new WEB2 sites is playing an ever decreasing role in my IM strategy. I have 30+ WEB2.0 blogs across 5 generic subject groups, most 50-100 posts (total unique) in size and added to frequently. I have pages on wordpress.com with a PR of 5 and on Livejournal with a PR of 4. I’m getting 1000′s of uniques a day to some of these sites (many over 18 months old) I don’t bother adding more sites, I add more contents (reviews, user guides, moans to “neg sell” a crap product) to my existing sites.
Adding more is giving me nothing what-so-ever in terms of benefit.
Adding to my existing sites is winning this battle hand over fist.
It takes a while to get a network up (think 3 months of posting several items a day) but you are pretty bullet proof. Not had one site lost/banned or censored. I have my sites as “featured” now and again on the networks (one Jimdo site was featured for about 3 days and I was getting a 5 figure visitor level every day. I was not paying attention at the time and only noticed right at the end. Visitor figs dropped 70% afterwards, and I hadn’t properly linked it up to my money sites…BAH)
Anyway – that’s where I am now.

Reply

Quentin August 23, 2011 at 9:11 pm

Question. As a newb in all this….about a year in, I am understanding the tiered concept, but I’m always worried about duplicate content. In other words, Should I write an article for my money site then spin it for use for syndication and use different versions for all the tiers? Or should my 2,3,4 tier etc content be unique content with the same keywords that is then spun to use for those tiers. Should I ever use my money site’s unique articles to spin for other tiers? this has been a hard question to find a clear answer for

Reply

Seo Melbourne September 27, 2011 at 12:42 am

The more back links you have out there, the more people will see it and the more traffic your website will get. Since there are a lot of competitors out there doing the same thing, you need to out muscle them by getting the most back links you can. Although the quantity of back links is important, today there are other factors that are more important and in fact you can get too many backlinks using automated methods that just spit back links across the web.

Reply

Daniel September 27, 2011 at 11:42 am

This is contradictory/confusing, is more better or not needed?

You can out-muscle the competition with better backlinks or more backlinks yes, it’s different in some niches, it all depend son what the competition is doing, and what works for them. 1000s of low quality backlinks may not win the day in some niches, but most likely could…

Link Building is sort of like a microcosm of your internet business model and strategy, you find something you’re comfortable doing, then just learn to do it well, and apply massive leverage, or stick with the one thing that produces results for you and be persistent.

Thanks for your comment mate!

Dan

Reply

Mark December 17, 2011 at 10:21 pm

Wow Dan tons of information here thank you.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Recommended Link building Services