Link Building Strategies, updated for 2012
Here’s some link building strategies that I decided to write up to address questions (and concerns) from people who purchase certain link building services then ask for strategy help, or want to know what my tips or “secrets” are for using these tools and services to maximum effect….
I rewrote this page on 3/4/2012, just after a late February/early March Google Panda 3.3…
I call its the sins of the Father algorithm update because it seems to be an algorithm update that devalued backlinks based on a historical pattern of uniform anchor text linking.
Also, Private blog networks don’t really gets slapped a lot, but what DOES get hurt over and over and over again are the group of people who come to rely too much upon only just one service, one anchor text, one backlink type, one backlink service
Nowadays your 2012 link building strategies should include the following
- Multiple anchor text used when link building (click here for a service that writes and submit for you using this method for 20 urls and multiple keywords at once)
- Good article marketing content, very well spun…for backlinking fodder (click here for a service that writes and submit for you using this method for 20 urls and multiple keywords at once)
- Social media backlinks and signals (click here to read a review on the best social media/social signal service I’ve tried)
The educated consumer is a powerful and happy consumer, so let’s get started with some terms you should be familiar with and their roles in effective SEO…
- (External) Tiered linking, AKA Getting Links to your backlinks
- Profiles links AKA Angela links, AKA Xrumer-like spam links
- Web 2.0 – and it’s role in link building
- Money sites
- Satellites, parasites
Money sites and main sites- these are ALWAYS , ALWAYS, ALWAYS your priority when striving for top rankings.
You don’t want your articles on article directories outranking content on your money sites, and same thing applies for any tier 2 entities like Web 2.0 hubpages, squidoo lenses etc….
Remember this as it is crucial to your SEO success!…
Your goal is not to have your content on other’s virtual properties out-ranking your own, but to get your own content self-hosted on your own sites ranked highest (at some point).
This is not SEO “theory” merely common sense…. I know that you want to see some high ranked articles and such when you’re first starting out, and trying to create some article marketing traffic, so YES it is OK if you rank your articles first, as long as they link to your money site in DoFollow manner and if you keep in mind that your money sites allow you more freedom with your content therefore more conducive to making conversions and earning those dollars.
Tiered linking: there’s external and internal tiered linking and most searches I’ve done for the term tiered linking referred to internal cross linking on sites, or site architecture, but in this particular space, tiered linking means external linking patterns, AKA the design and organizational structure of your inbound linking profile, AKA your link juice build up, AKA your… ok that’s enough “AKAs” I hope you get the point here.
Traditionally, link building meant direct linking from one entity to your main site, your money site, and article marketing was the primary whitehat way to do this, aside from reciprocal linking, but with the advent of all the “Web 2.0″ sites that soon became authority sites trusted highly by the search engines, these became great places from which to obtain links from, and also a great place to send backlinks to (more on this later…).
The smart/intermediate/proficient link building knows that direct linking to one’s money sites is a rather self-limiting exercise because you will end up running out of entities to direct link from, unless you find other entities to direct link juice towards.
When doing external tiered linking you’re doing something like the following:
Shitty links >>> crappy links >>> less crappy sites linking to >>> your money sites
Tier 3 and 4 and 5 Shitty links – Xrumer, WPMUs, LFE urls, low level article directories——
Tier 2 entities- hubpages, squidoos lenses, good article directories like articlesbase, goarticles, ezinearticles, guest posts on relevant highly trusted sites
Web 2.0 sites – First off I gotta rant a little bit about the term “Web 2.0″, which was originally a type of technology, which came to have a certain design associated with it, then it became associative with certain kinds of sites, which then became known as Web 2.0 sites, but I’ll play along here and continue to call the following types of sites, Web 2.0 sites, to name just a few: HubPages, Squidoo, Vox, Twitter, wordpress.com
The role of Web 2.0s in link building- Most of the tier 2 Web 2.0s you want to be creating are on high Page Ranked domains but more importantly, are aged, trusted entities that enjoy high search engine trust, and most importantly to the end users, they’re easy to create, and publish content to.
Since these are entities that can contain your keywords you’re targeting you can create keyword optimized “web 2.0 sites” to rank for certain terms, but you can also funnel link juice through them, on towards your money sites. That’s what you want to do at some point when your understanding of how link building works goes beyond the minimal direct linking and advances beyond that towards what could be considered the next step in your SEO-volution.
Let me re-emphasize that it is SOLID SEO to direct link to your sites form the more trusted entities first, (at first) then once your site has enough of these trusted links pointing to them, to then consider expanding outwards into doing crappier links to your tier 2 entities and money sites…
But for now let’s just expand outwardly, slowly and consider as hypothetical fact that you:
- have a money site
- have some Dofollow Web 2.0 entities built
- are linking to money sites form the Web 2.0s
So, let’s say you build some lenses and hubs and other DoFollow entities, how do you pass link juice to them?
Well, that’s where, the lesser quality links and sites come into play.
Blog networks are chock full of lower quality sites, but in many cases the sites linking to you are related niche sites so they can we used for direct linking to money sites and towards the Tier 2 entities.
But for those blog networks that have all the posts in general categories on sites whose purpose is solely to link farm out to others’ sites, then it’s best to use these to link from here to your tier 2 sites, but there’s no harm in direc tlinking to money sites either.
Hope this last part doesn’t confuse you, I’m just stating what BEST practice would be, whilst also adding that there’s no penalty for direct linking to money sites from crappy blog network sites.
Parasites and WPMUS - parasites are basically places you place links on or place content fo rlinks on for sole purpose of obtaining backinks.
Guestbooks, fake hreferrer spam (if you don’t know what this is, you don’t wana know), forum profile links, WPMUs… these are all pretty much parasite entities since you’re creating accounts there to bleed off the link juice and authorit yof the sites, not add quality to them.
WPMUs are wordpress multi user sites, a particular type of WordPress installation that allows fo rremote registrations on a subdomain, a new blog installation on said domain and these are used for either
1- adding quality content to that particular community
2- adding content there for sole purpos eo f”parasiting” (most used practice, really)
What makes parasites low quality, low level entities for link building is they basically become quasi link farms that contain crap spun content and link out to whatever they can link out to (when used by ahem.. “SEO spammers”). since there’s no quality content on these WPMUs usually, and no real attempt to interact with the readers, these entities end up becoming link farm-like creations as I mentioned earlier; linking out way more than they get linked to, and used mostly for pushing and funneling and harvesting link juice as part of the tiered linking mechanism.
NOTE: There’s a TON of parasite entities out there, and these are definitely not restricte dot just WPMUs but they’re a pretty good example of parasites.
Parasites are to be used for linking to your backlinks and while some people say it’s best practice to NOT link directly to money sites from here, you can and will get away with it once you’ve established enough quality backlinks already.
When doing external tiered linking you’re doing something like the following:
Shitty links >>> crappy links >>> less crappy sites linking to >>> your money sites
Tier 3 and 4 and 5 Shitty links – Xrumer, WPMUs, LFE urls, low level article directories——
Tier 2 entities- hubpages, squidoos lenses, good article directories like articlesbase, goarticles, ezinearticles, guest posts on relevant highly trusted sites.
Why all this talk about tiered linking and linking to your backlinks?
When using article syndication services, AKA blog networks to syndicate content for purpose of direct traffic and backlinks, you will at some point have your content hosted-and-posted on the same sites, therefore it just makes sense to have another ring of optimized web entities to direct your links toward.
IMPORTANT NOTE:
- Try not to get overwhelmed here with all this talk of tiered linking, thinking that you need 100s of thousands of links to do link building effectively.
- If direct linking from article directories and blog networks does the trick for you then do ONLY THAT.
- If you have more tools at your disposal and need to create more link juice from/to more web entities then expand outward as needed.

{ 49 comments… read them below or add one }
Hello Dan,
If you were promoting 200 keywords by just using Uaw would you rewrite them over and over to avoid having to create 200 fresh and unique articles month in month out?
Would you spin each 1+2 over and over and put them into different keyword categories,change title,anchor text and paragraph length.
How do you go about finding the many keyword categories…Ezine?
Sean
This is awesome, thanks dan. I sent you an email after my purchase of BS on how to get the snippets done effectively, with this writeup you have overdelivered. Many thanks.
On another note I have one question, if you would be kind enough to answer. For UAW whats the quickest most efficient way to get articles done considering I have the best spinner at hand.
Any advice would be appreciated.
oh. Sorry one more thing. For the BS links I take it that you are using paragraphs from ezines as your base then spinning them 90 -120 times?
Just seemed confusing as you have that as step 2 rather than step 1.
hi Dan,
i would like to invite you on a JV if your are interested please email me
replied via email
Do you have any experience with Magic Submitter?
Would be great to hear your take on it.
Thanks.
I have experience with Aleks Krulik’s Magic Submitter.
I will say up front that it is a tool with a great deal of potential. The ability to add your own sites to it is a real winner (similar to Sick Submitter I suppose)
But it comes with too few sites as standard, and many of those need fixing “out of the box” including (during the time I was a subscriber) Ezine. Squidoo and others that really should just “work”. These are your bread and butter sites, no way so many of them should fail (due to sign up syntax problems I might add, not “time outs” or other web related errors. I was continually getting errors of the “password field not found” or “unable to locate captcha” sort.)
The advise I got was “you can fix this by…” and a few lines telling me how the macro programming system worked.
I make link rings on a weekly basis (all unique content so mostly a WH exercise really GH at worst) and was hoping that this tool could be a real time saver for account creation and content posting.
Given that I only make 6-8 spoke rings, I find that imacros and a few other free tools lets me do the whole thing a lot quicker.
Also I like to add profiles, photo’s etc to the WEB2.0 sites I join up to (adds credibility etc) Out of the box MS does the very bare minimum.
I think this tool has a great future if handled well, but for now I will stick with Imacros and some very nice form filling in software I bought from Warrior forums. It allows me to join most sites in under 60 seconds, and that’s good enough for me.
So the issue is, the great tools you should be using to add functionality to a stable system are instead used to correct the basic functionality of that system
If I was to get anything to do this, then I might go the Sick route and buy some profile packs. Really don’t want to be bothered with adding “software maintenance for third party SEO solutions” to the list of tasks I already do
In case you were wondering..
I would not consider the Senuke route. The web holdings it posts to are too limited for a tool that costs such a lot per month. I was a subscriber for almost 2 years, and saw that although they work hard keeping the functionality “clean” and fix sign up and submission errors quickly – the limitations of the keyword tool, the very basic nature of the spinner, and the paucity of sites that it allows you to post to mean that I was suffering from diminishing returns month by month. By now most of the sites outside the “big” few are little more than “spam hutches” with the PR of several of them in rapid decline.
Good places to visit if you need to lose weight, buy viagra or play warcraft though
Paul
I heard that Magic had potential, too. I’m just not a big fan of using standalone tools versus services since it ends up causing me to deal with a learning curve, bugs, new account creations, etc…
Re. SE Nuke… I think you’re nuts bud…
there’s no other service nor tool that submits to more Web 2.0s than SE Nuke, not SERP Assist nor Link Builders Pro, that’s for sure
Fair enough. I’ll go along with that to some extent. I wasn’t clear, and Nuke is certainly a very good tool as far as account creation and submission goes.
It’s paying a premium for the other stuff that I really do object to. Keyword tool (very average) spinner (as basic as it gets)
As a stand alone web2.0 tool I’d pay $60 a month for it. By the end of my time though, that was the only value the whole Nuke suite was giving me I had replaced every other aspect of the software with better alternatives
Sick Sub and a decent pack does roughly the same for 1/6th of the cost.(It has some of the same issues as MS mind you)
As a beginner tool, or for those who like everything organised under one roof, then Nuke is a good tool. But with other stuff banging on the door and competing in terms of this applications main functionality for a fraction of the cost, then, once you have bought a better keyword tool, a better spinner and found good free RSS submission tools and such like, then it really all comes down to WEB2.0 account creation and submission
For my money, for a slightly more experienced IMer then Nuke struggles to offer value. Good though it is, there are tools that do the same thing cheaper.
On that – a big fan of totally free stuff like imacros’s and Duke’s form filler (I don’t think Duke owns it any more but Roboform for those who haven’t got a copy) together you can really go to town and work almost as fast as any bought solution for a small initial cost of a few tens of dollars, then more or less free.
I could waffle on about having all your favourite WEB2.0 sign up URL’s tabbed in Firefox, Foxyproxy swapping your IP, cache cleaner hoovering your history, and then Roboform and Imacros, hammering in the data..and it all costing nothing and taking maybe 5 minutes to set up full profiles on 10 or twelve WEB2.0 properties for little or no cash.
I could say that..but I won’t (sorry couldn’t resist that)
No seriously Nuke is a good tool. I was a little harsh. For beginners who want a catch all solution, then it is as good as they get. Areeb and I have had some heated debates on this a few weeks ago on NUkes forum, and I conceded that it is probably the best all in one SEO tool available, though I don’t like the “all in one” tag myself.
However, once you know your way around the web, and know what you can get for free, or for a one of price, then with a little knowledge (and some organization) it can be beaten in terms of performance, and most tellingly – price.
I suppose it’s the time it takes to get that knowledge that kills most people. I read somewhere (here maybe – probably in many different places, pretty certain it’s a common stat) that 90%+ of IM’s never make $100 and quit inside a year.
a tool like Nuke is always going to have a place helping these guys. The risk is that some may never learn the “nuts and bolts” and become truly adaptable IMers. Once the crutch of a system like Nuke is removed, then many of these guys and gals might be back at the start knowing very little about the process.
So (thanks to your comment, and me thinking about it for a few minutes – how fickle I am) I now endorse Nuke for new IMers. As a subsciber for almost 2 years I know the product inside out, and it is a very well maintained piece of kit. Very rarely fails on sign ups or submissions and provides novice IMers with “just about” everything they need in one place.
If I was a novice IMer I would be delighted with it as a recommendation, but I would definitely look to keep increasing my knowledge of all things web based outside of Nuke.
Hope that all comes across as fair?
Paul Clarke
Cool beans man, no worries, I accept all friend requests and differing points of view and opinions.
I did and am still doing the Sick routine, ordered over 100 dollars in packets, had outsourced the creations and what-not, and still far less valuable than ordering an Xrumer blast., as the lists are small even after ordering a few links packets but rather economical if these are continually bought and added to Sick software, akin to buying Xrumer DBs once every few months, too though.
There’s some stuff coming out that will be better than SE nuke and for less price, but SE Nuke is still a powerhouse tool in the right hands. As you can see I don’t talk about it much on this site though, since I don’t want to send people down a dark road of high expectations when the tools a PC resource hogs, and still buggy.
I think you’re on the right path though, you’re finding out what works, you’re being economical, getting your own toolset together etc…but I value my time greatly and will also splurge on services like LinxBoss that merely require some keywords and urls and waiting…
When you’re making decent income the costs don’t really matter, but saving time and sanity does, capische?
I’m making barely more than my old “normal” job, so I’m more “time rich” than “cash rich” at the mo’
Good point – well made. Scaling up is vital once the balance changes if you want to keep progressing. And that costs.
There are things I know I could earn more cash doing (errm like stuff involving Craigs list if you get my drift) but never appealed to me.
I’ll keep on trucking – catch you later man
To clarify… which tool would be preferred, if choosing just one: Magic Submitter of SEnuke?
Thanks.
I’ll jump in here as an ex user of both (sorry).
For stability and ease of use (and essp if you don’t have a dedicated keyword tool) I would go for nuke – but look to drop it once your SEO skill set improves and you find better/cheaper ways to link.
If MS gets off it’s ass it may well end up as better value, but it needs too much work “out of the box” to make it a viable proposition for anyone other than those willing to spend a lot of time fixing its basic functionality.
Both are best employed in making high quality link rings, but neither does the job as completely or as accurately as I would like.
I thought I already posted this…Dan, in BLS are you saying do 1 anf 2 or 1 or 2?
Buddy
Hey Buddy I deleted the comment because it didn’t make much sense to me
Oh, sorry.
Where you talk about the link building process (in BLS) are you saying write your own article to spin and re-purpose Ezine articles or those are two ways of doing the same thing?
Does that make better sense?
Buddy
I was saying, re-purpose EZA if you can’t think of anything to write about, just grab 3 paragraphs form 3 different articles, or just write 60-100 original words and spin them
Hi Dan,
@ Paul,
Great post and feedback,
You seem pretty clued up guy’s so I wanted to bounce an architecture question off you both.
I want to build a solid back linking solution for myself and my new SEO clients.
I would like to build a design that is robust and produces results ongoing. It has to be white hat, not black or grey. im thinking that having a private aged domain a layer tier will provide protection from spam, slpogs etc..
I’m thinking of a 4 tier architecture
Tier 4>>Tier 3>>Tier 2 Private>> Tier 1 Money Site
Tier 2 Private aged domains Wordpress & rss optimiser, quality articles
Tier 3 (WPMU???) low quality articles (can you autoblog on these?)
Tier 4 (Profiles – Xrumer???)
I’m interested in your view on the above architecture and how tier 3 & 4 would work with available tools, techniques and your experienced knowledge.
What is the best suggested architecture and tools I should invest my “limited budget” in?
Cheers,
John
I’m thinking of a 4 tier architecture
Tier 4>>Tier 3>>Tier 2 Private>> Tier 1 Money Site
Tier 2 Private aged domains WordPress & rss optimiser, quality articles
Tier 3 (WPMU???) low quality articles (can you autoblog on these?)
Tier 4 (Profiles – Xrumer???)
I’m interested in your view on the above architecture and how tier 3 & 4 would work with available tools, techniques and your experienced knowledge.
That’s pretty good, u need an indexing network, too though. Read this, this will help with some of what you’re planning
Also, at some point you can use Xrumer to every url on every tier, once sites are aged enough and have enough links so they don’t get blasted into oblivion.
I’ve spent over 2 hours on your site, reading about the different link building services you recommend/reviewed, and your strategy document on linking, and wanted to say a huge big ‘Thank You’ for making all this available in one location on the Web.
It has been an informative and instructive time, well worth investing, and what you have shared will be of immense help in guiding me on the right tools to buy to implement my strategy. It has been quite a while since I studied SEO related stuff, and this was a very nice ‘refresher course’
I will be sure to let many people know about the value you provide. If there’s anything I can do to help you, please ask.
Thanks again, Daniel.
All success
Dr.Mani
Dr.Mani, like to see you dropping by. I know you’ve done some charity work in the past, and I DO have a charity that’s sponsoring me for the Boston Marathon, maybe you could give me some pointer on fund raising?
Would be delighted to. Drop me a quick email with details, and I’ll do my best to help.
Multi tiered is good. I find the higher PR article sites are a great second tier to the web ring strategy.
I look for PR7+ for the closest tier, then 5+ for the next, then pretty much anything after that
isnare, ezine,alley,go,dashboard and a few others have decent PR (for the site anyway – not neccessarily your article URL) and make a very good second step. A decent article submitter that includes a bunch of PR5+ sites is a good investment. Boost these views, bookmark them, and backlink the articles.
Third tier for me is a “garbage” tier. any inks I can find just get chucked in.
Having a well established Ezine account with hundreds of articles on is well worth the investment at the moment.
Scritty
Notice Dan has sort of endorsed article marketing robot on another thread.
I second that with bells on – the best 80 bucks I’ve spent in months. Whereas my previous efforts were either;
a) good at sending 500+ to spammy sites (a la Traffic mania) or
b) able to send to a couple of hundred sites including the decent ones – when the software was maintained well enough for this all to work…
AMR has over 1300 – including all the big names, plenty of PR3-PR6 sites, great success rates on both sign up and submission The site I whacked in this profile was a domain I bought 4 weeks ago -and started actually promoting last week – this tool has already made me the cash I invested in it back..
Not sure if this was the place to mention this – but the best stand alone tool I’ve bought since micro niche finder (which paid for itself in a week as well)
Dan you mentioned in BuildMyRank best practices above, 10 links per URL. Have you got good results in your tests with just 10 links per URL?
Hi Kishore, you’re the one who mentioned that, not me (I think). For my most recent BMR test, I’ve submitted 40 links to a specific url in less than a month so the 10 links/url might be a daily cap, not a weekly nor monthly cap.
Yes, in the BMR faq it is mentioned “up to 10 posts daily per domain.”
And Dan, In BMR Best Practices above you mentioned –
“#3- You really can do some damage here with just a few links,” and
“#6- This bears repeating… 10 articles per url”
I was asking about this. Did you see results by just getting 10 articles per url for some of your keywords?
What I was trying to emphasize there was,
” a few links might help you rank where you want, just don’t be stingy and do like 2 links per url, but instead make sure you send 10 links per url” you want ranked up, linked up
Daniel,
I’m a little confused on how I should be choosing my anchor text keywords for my tiers. For example, say I want to rank my money site for the keyword “laptop bag reviews”.
First Tier (my money site)
Second Tier (ezinearticles, hubpages, squidoo, goarticles) – each article’s topic would be on laptop bags, with a link to my money site using the anchor text “laptop bags reviews”.
Third Tier (low quality articles like from UAW) – articles published via UAW that contain links to my second tier articles. However, this is where I’m confused. Should my anchor text be “laptop bag reviews”, or something else related to the second tier articles?
Fourth Tier (crappy links like XRumer Blasts) – profile links that link back to my UAW articles. Again, I’m confused on what my anchor text should be.
Audrey you have every right to be confused.
Those who write and speak about tiered/layered linking don’t really all agree on what anchor text should be.
There’s several reasons for this, one main one being that sometimes you could write a general article with general article topic of “starting a new project car” but your anchor links are for MOPAR parts, so you eventually want to rank for MOPAR Parts, but seeing as how article title is “start new project car” then that doesn’t make much sense. This can get confusing… do you rank the articles for the titles, or just send generic meaningless anchor text to them.
What’s the goal of tiered linking, total niche domination with every hub, lens, and article being top ranked for the keywords in the title?
Or is the goal to merely send “link juice” AKA a slew of backlinks…. to all your tiers so they have some “oomph!” behind them?
I recommend hybrid approach of trying to rank your 1st tier (1 link away from money site) for main or sub-main or long tail keywords, and as for other deeper tiers, just send whatever anchor text you can to them without extra effort.
I like to do this:
1 – money site, exact keywords – “red ladies’ hats”
. This tier is more about indexing the backlinks anyway.
2 – 1st tier, (web 2.0 etc.) – stuff about “ladies’ hats” in general, with anchors texts to tier 1 containing “red ladies’ hats”. As long as I never plan to target “ladies’ hats” in general, of course.
3 – 2nd tier, (e.g. AMR) – articles about “hats”, with “ladies’ hats” in anchor text of links to Tier 1
4 – well, if I bother with a 3rd tier then anchor text can be “hats” and the content can be just about anything you can wangle the word “hats” into
That makes your “pyramid” increasingly contextual and avoids the danger of your BL properties outranking your money site, too. At the moment this seems to be an effective strategy which takes some of the overthinking out of things, for me anyway.
P.S. Of course in step 2 I meant “anchor texts to money site”, not tier 1. And would also like to add thanks for this overview and to suggest it would be nice to see some discussion about AMR best practices too, as it seems this is still a powerful tool, but people seem to be seeing diminishing returns with it, possibly due to the methods they are using. I am still a little in two minds, and am waiting for some results to come in, but can’t see how one can go wrong with all those hundreds of easily-gained backlinks, provided you leverage them right.
Thanks so much for the clarification, Daniel! I’m going to try the hybrid approach as you recommended.
You’re welcome, anytime
I don’t really go more than 3 tiers deep (unless you count pure bookmarks I suppose) It can get very confusing. I mean the PR from a decent profile set up in Xrumer is not going to be much more or less than a link from one of the cookie cutter PR0 sites that UAW submits to. Which one google ranks”higher” is anyones guess.
Hi, Thanks for the run down on Link build/tiers, etc.
Question:
#1
I want to offer a Back linking tool(s) recommendation for my members (monetized, blog building membership)
#2
I need a tool(s) so I can offer a back linking service to members who want it done for them
Hope that is clear,
Jim >
Hi Dan,
Sorry about posting this here. Would you be willing to add a “recent comments” widget in your sidebar? I like to see what others are saying and if I’m not subscribed to that post it makes it difficult.
Thanks.
Can anyone elaborate on this comment by Paul Clarke:
I could waffle on about having all your favourite WEB2.0 sign up URL’s tabbed in Firefox, Foxyproxy swapping your IP, cache cleaner hoovering your history, and then Roboform and Imacros, hammering in the data..and it all costing nothing and taking maybe 5 minutes to set up full profiles on 10 or twelve WEB2.0 properties for little or no cash.
…actually I understand that part about using roboform and imacros but I’m wondering about FoxyProxy and Cache Cleaner. I imagine if you’re going to be creating link wheels and social bookmarking tons of different pages and stuff you would need to change proxies every now and then but I can’t find any information on this…. like when do you change proxies and how exactly do you do it?
Thanks!
If I was to get anything to do this, then I might go the Sick route and buy some profile packs. Really don’t want to be bothered with adding “software maintenance for third party SEO solutions” to the list of tasks I already doIn case you were wondering..I would not consider the Senuke route. The web holdings it posts to are too limited for a tool that costs such a lot per month. I was a subscriber for almost 2 years, and saw that although they work hard keeping the functionality “clean” and fix sign up and submission errors quickly – the limitations of the keyword tool, the very basic nature of the spinner, and the paucity of sites that it allows you to post to mean that I was suffering from diminishing returns month by month. By now most of the sites outside the “big” few are little more than “spam hutches” with the PR of several of them in rapid decline.
+1
@ Eda.
Notice you’ve quoted me, assuming you are not a “spam bot” in disguise. In which case an italicized quote with +1 on the end is “genius simple”….
I did indeed try Sick out, and though I would certainly not discount Sick – I’d suggest perhaps having a look at some other solutions.
Most of the programming I have done in SS has required a lot of fiddle and mess, and many of the packets I’ve tried fall over of had a failure rate higher than I would have liked (with private proxies and good captcha service as well)
The conclusion I have reached is that profile spamming and web2.0 creation is not the issue at all.
It’s getting a decent mix of links from many sources and getting them securely indexed.
Creating new WEB2 sites is playing an ever decreasing role in my IM strategy. I have 30+ WEB2.0 blogs across 5 generic subject groups, most 50-100 posts (total unique) in size and added to frequently. I have pages on wordpress.com with a PR of 5 and on Livejournal with a PR of 4. I’m getting 1000′s of uniques a day to some of these sites (many over 18 months old) I don’t bother adding more sites, I add more contents (reviews, user guides, moans to “neg sell” a crap product) to my existing sites.
Adding more is giving me nothing what-so-ever in terms of benefit.
Adding to my existing sites is winning this battle hand over fist.
It takes a while to get a network up (think 3 months of posting several items a day) but you are pretty bullet proof. Not had one site lost/banned or censored. I have my sites as “featured” now and again on the networks (one Jimdo site was featured for about 3 days and I was getting a 5 figure visitor level every day. I was not paying attention at the time and only noticed right at the end. Visitor figs dropped 70% afterwards, and I hadn’t properly linked it up to my money sites…BAH)
Anyway – that’s where I am now.
Question. As a newb in all this….about a year in, I am understanding the tiered concept, but I’m always worried about duplicate content. In other words, Should I write an article for my money site then spin it for use for syndication and use different versions for all the tiers? Or should my 2,3,4 tier etc content be unique content with the same keywords that is then spun to use for those tiers. Should I ever use my money site’s unique articles to spin for other tiers? this has been a hard question to find a clear answer for
The more back links you have out there, the more people will see it and the more traffic your website will get. Since there are a lot of competitors out there doing the same thing, you need to out muscle them by getting the most back links you can. Although the quantity of back links is important, today there are other factors that are more important and in fact you can get too many backlinks using automated methods that just spit back links across the web.
This is contradictory/confusing, is more better or not needed?
You can out-muscle the competition with better backlinks or more backlinks yes, it’s different in some niches, it all depend son what the competition is doing, and what works for them. 1000s of low quality backlinks may not win the day in some niches, but most likely could…
Link Building is sort of like a microcosm of your internet business model and strategy, you find something you’re comfortable doing, then just learn to do it well, and apply massive leverage, or stick with the one thing that produces results for you and be persistent.
Thanks for your comment mate!
Dan
Wow Dan tons of information here thank you.
So the new 2012 strategy is:
Create links on trusted sites like:
YouTube, Press Release links like PRWeb, hubpages, squidoos lenses, good article directories like articlesbase, goarticles, ezinearticles, and also guest posts on trusted blog posts. The links you get on these trusted sites should point at more than 1 page on your site. While doing this remember to have a large variety of keywords, to ensure not to “Over Optimize” for keywords.
Then use Blog Content Networks to get Back Links to those trusted sites.
If you don’t use a blog content network, then you can use other crappier type of links like blog comments, profile comments and links, crappier article directories, to point at the trusted links.
After your your site has built up trust and page one rankings (or high page one rankings). Then start building more links (slowly) to the other pages on the site by using links from companies like Backlink Banzai.
While your doing all of this get Social links (Facebook, twitter, Google +1) to your site, again more than just the home page and using a variety of keywords. Your advice would be to use Synnd.
Then once your site is trusted and authority, then get links from the likes of The Private Network.
Do I have your 2012 post Panda 3.3 strategy correct?
That’s a pretty good strategy. I think what needs to be looked at moving forward is remembering what the overall goal is, and that’s traffic.
Do SEO stuff to raise rankings, and to get traffic
Do vid mktg, to get page views, and traffic
Do guest posting, to get traffic and rankings
Go viral, to get traffic
Go social, for traffic, and rankings
I know it really doesn’t make sense from a network owner’s stand-point but if they had slew of sites in a certain niche, or mutiple niches, like SEOContentNetwork does, then selling guest posting spots for a fee would sort of make sense.
I think selling links that brings traffic will be key, almost like buying banner space but using content in stead of banners
Hi Dan,
I’m just wondering if you still use directory and blog comment at tier-2 (direct link to your money site)?
I find your stated tier-2 strategy is pretty reply on “content” at Web 2.0 & blog network.
Hi, this page you commented on, almost requires constant updating
Manual web 2.0 building will result in traffic generation if done correctly, but they’ll need to get traffic in order to deliver traffic so same ranking rules apply, it’s just easier to rank entities on trusted platforms like the more common web 2.0s
directory links will almost always go to main site urls, so yes that’s where directory links should point to. Can’t say they’re very effective though
Thanks for your reply Dan.
What about blog comment? We still see lot of pages manage to rank well with lot of low quality blog comments (PR page but many OBLs).
As for directory, my personal experience is an authoritative directory such as Yahoo Dir can act as a good “stabilizer”.