High PR link Services & how to use them for maximum value

by Daniel on January 4, 2012

in Link building Tips

In a recent post I wrote about what’s working now for SEO (the way we do it).  A question that’s come up repeatedly has had to do with High PR link services and how to use them for maximum value.

To be clear, when discussing high PR link services here in this article we’re referring to the home page backlinks services.

Homepage Backlinks services are networks of sites whose domains have Page Rank and your links appear on the Home Page of these sites where the Page Rank is usually highest.  Once you stop paying for these rented link, they disappear.

Before discussing maximum effect best practices, here’s a question I was asked (finally) that I want to talk about first.

“Dan, if these links are non-permanent, and go away when I don’t pay, what’s the use in that, that makes no sense, why would anyone do that?”

Here’s another question I made up, to play Devil’s Advocate…

“Why not rent banner ad space and get qualified traffic instead of renting links and SERP improvements?”

Rented ad space, renting links..what’s the diff?

Once you stop paying the traffic stops, or the SERPs drop when the links drop off…

Why is it most people’s goal to get to Page 1 for something?  More traffic or for vanity SERPs …

Why do we want more traffic? Because the assumption is more traffic equals more sales.

So, if you’re ranked Page 1 already and want to move up, Home Page backlinks services are a way to accomplish this in most cases, and with ease…  just keep paying…

And when you move up you’ll make more money as your traffic increases, so if it’s not worth it for you or your site to get higher rankings this way, then re-assess what you’re doing with your site, plain and simple.

If it’s not worth it for you to spend 57-97/month to rank your site higher, then what’s the point in trying to rank the site at all, for anything?

How much time and money do we spend on article writing and spinning and all that wonderful stuff?

The only article I’ve written in the past year or so has been on some niche sites I take temporary interests in, or on here at this link building site o’ mine.   I’ve read tons of business books and self improvement books over the years and the one thing that’s always stood out in my head is that my time is valuable, and that I should put a price on my time.

For example, I would value my time at 200/hour

To write an article and spin it and submit it might take me 30 minutes or so (guessing here)

To do this twice would take me an hour

And the SEO value obtained from those 2 articles will not, ever…equal the value of renting links that boost SERPs, without me having to lift a finger.

This is effectiveness, to a point, but on the other hand I’ve built nothing of permanence here, I have no permanent links and I hate that quite a bit, but here’s the deal here….

When rankings increase your site should make more money, more than the cost of the service you chose to use.

  • Take your increased earnings (extra 500/month)
  • Deduct cost of services used to attain higher SERPs and earnings (200 tops)
  • You’re left with 300 in profit
  • Take the 300 and dump it into quality article submissions or some other type of high quality link building…
  • You break even at this point, but you’ve got a system going now
  • You’ve rented your way to higher earnings,
  • And used profits to maintain the sustainability of those increased SERPs via permanent link building methods.

OK, enough of that, on to how to use these high PR link services effectively

Link to your home page for a term that has a chance of moving up, be realistic here…  high PR links services aren’t magic bullets for rankings but they sure do work well now.

Use 1-3 keywords as your anchor text if you insist, but it really doesn’t matter if you use anchor text variety here, because strictly speaking it’s not like you’re getting a whole bunch of links here, probably less than 50 with most high PR services, and if you got 50 high PR links with the same anchor text, it’s not going to cause a “disturbance in the force” due to a “lack” of variety in your inbound links’ anchor text.

However, if you’re not sure whether these links or services will work well for you, then use anchor text for a lesser competitive phrase or term, and see how that goes.  Most services will allow you to change your anchor text and urls at some point, but if they know what they’re doing they’re not going to allow you to change the urls and keywords frequently.

So link to your home pages, as these most likely have the most link juice to them and will respond quickest to high powered links of this kind.

Your newly acquired home page link juice can now be passed down, throughout your site and you’ll eventually have some PR passage form main urls down to inner urls of your site, and while this may not necessarily mean those inner urls will rank higher with no extra effort, the point here is that linking to your home page with high PR links will build up the link juice to your site at the top and the juice will only flow downward and outward to the rest of your site over time.

If you link to an inner url with home page links, it hardly ever benefits your main domain url for the keywords and phrases it’s optimized for.

What about the rest of your site(s)?   If you’re using high PR link services to rank your home page(s), how will you rank the inner pages and stuff?

Main domains of all sites should target the hardest keywords from the main url, and the rest of the site should be build to attract visitors by being optimized for lower volume keywords, or the long-tail.

Of course, you could also build a dedicated static home page, throw up a 800-word article optimized for 50 keywords and just focus on the home page itself and that will work, too but if you do that, then some of the keywords out of that fictitious 50 will be of the lower volume and/or lower competition variety.

And since the home page is now packing so much inbound link juice to itself, some of the easier terms you’re targeting on that dedicated home page will rank higher without needing additional links.

Am I suggesting that you build a dedicated, static home page, and to target 50 keywords on that page?

Nope, not at all, it does work well, but it also make for a rather boring read to your visitors with Internet ADHD reading habits (scan and skip).

Anyhoo, if your sites like most sites, you’re targeting only a few keyword son your home page and trying to rank inner urls for long-tails or lower volume/competition keywords, so in these cases you want to build permanent links, since the permanent links will most likely be acquired via syndication of articles that end up on PR 0 urls, not hing wrong with that though, since lower competition terms merely require link volume and not link power in order to rank, along with good on-page seo too of course.

Hope this helps…  Any questions please post them below in comments section, thanks D.  :)

 

 

{ 22 comments… read them below or add one }

Paul B January 5, 2012 at 9:57 am

Hi Dan,

From my experience sites in the top 3, but especially first are also much more likely to pick up the type of genuine, natural backlinks that Google loves so much. Renting can be a great temporary way of getting your website in to a position where others are more inclined to link to it, doing away with the need for the rented links further down the line.

Reply

Daniel January 5, 2012 at 1:03 pm

Paul, thanks this is a great point omitted from my article here due to sloppiness, sorry

Rented links or propped up SERPs will definitely get you natural backlinks, I forgot to mention that.

Aside from being in top 3, sometimes just getting into top 10 gets you free backlinks because there’s all these plugins out there now that will link to related article son the internet, but based on urls ranking in the top 10 for certain terms those bloggers specified…

Sometimes these are permanent links seen as trackbacks, and sometimes the plugin does a re crawl and updates the top 10 list so if you’re not in top 10 then you don’t get that free trackback…

But back to your good point Paul, yes being #1 or top 3 gets REAL permanent backlinks, but not often, but those “naturals” tend to pass more trust and have more staying power than the truly gamed backlinks.

Thanks for picking up my slack with your value adding comment Paul :)
Dan

Reply

Bill Zimmerman January 9, 2012 at 5:43 pm

Dan you mentioned plugins that automatically link out from specified terms to a related page. Can you link me to one or two? Thanks

Reply

Daniel January 9, 2012 at 10:05 pm

Bill, I’m going to RESPECTFULLY decline this because I don’t think it does your sites any good, long-term. But the marketing forums and wordpress.org has plenty of auto-link-getting plugins like this, I’dstay away form them though. I’ve used them and they work to some degree, but in long haul, they are just more work than they’re worth.

Primarily because of the facts that:

1- Some of them run in an automated fashion, calling upon a SQL database or something like that, any hosting providers don’t like seeing that activity too often on their platforms, thereby ending up causing you grief in long run when they disable your sites (had this happen 3-4 times at end of last year, due to plugins like this, but not exactly like this)

2- Some of the outbound link placements become permanent, even after you disable the plugin, leaving you with an outbound permanent link to someone else’s site

Reply

Bill Zimmerman January 10, 2012 at 4:58 pm

No problem. Was just curious how it worked and why people would use it. I wouldn’t want to automatically link out to a site so thought maybe I was just missing something.

Bill

michael January 6, 2012 at 2:47 pm

Dan,

Thanks again for the details. I’m obsessed with learning how to most effectively point the backlinks I’m getting with BMR. One issue I am concerned with is I have an inner page of one of my sites that is ranking for a three word term that according to Google has 27,000 exact match local searches every month. It is on the first page and has gone up to #2 spot for one month and then dropped off on October 13th of this year. Since then I’ve added 12 BMR links directly to the page but I have used a variety of anchor text including the name domain name. But from what I see here you are suggesting that I may not need to be concerned early on with variety since I probably only have about 50 links going to that page anyway? Also, if I use a High PR renting service and point links with the same anchor text I’m ranking for on the inner page already will I then be competing my home page with my inner page? I’ve only been at this for 18 months, but since I’ve found your site I feel like things are starting to make sense. Thanks!

Michael

Reply

Daniel January 6, 2012 at 3:21 pm

Hey Michael, great question on an issue I’ve dealt with many times before.

So we have a home page and an inner url that could both feasibly rank for the same terms, right?

And at one point the inner url was doing well.

If you pointed HPBLS to the home page, make sure the on-page is good for that term, and anchor text, then link to the inner url if that’s the real destination you want readers to go to.

For example, you get HPBLs with anchor text blue widgets to widgets.com

widgets.com, home page seo includes kws green widgets, blue widgets, black widgets…

Point the HPBLs to main domain, widgets.com and since the page is also optimized for blue widgets, it will rank for the term blue wdigets, at some point

But do you really want this?

you ranked the inner url without having to use HPBLs, which are more powerful than BMR links, so maybe HPBLs is overkill for that kw on the inner url.

You were #2 before, so you can get #2 again using same methods as before, so rewrite the page that was ranking, tweak it, revisit the on page seo, change the content, link it back up again, and see what happens.

OR… do option #1, rank the home page for that term (may need to tweak home page seo for this), and a link to the inner url widgets/com/blue widgets from the home page IF… that’s where you really want your visitors to go.

If you’re selling blue widgets off the home page, no need to link to blue widgets inner url in a dominant part of the page.

Dominant part of a page?

This means you place a link somewhere highly visible for readers and search engine spiders to notice it and follow it. If you don’t really want that, then you could always just link to the inner url below everything else on the home page.

Also, sorry to give you a 3d option here but as this article stated above…I think… if you use HPBLs to link using anchor text of just a general kw like widgets… you may not rank for widgets but the PR link Juice boost will affect the inner urls, it will pass from top down and affect the rankings of your inner url positively, if it’s linked to from the home page.

Please read this if you have time, might help you if you need more ‘obsession” fodder :)

Thanks for the question and comment, good luck!

Dan

Reply

rhythm January 7, 2012 at 10:45 am

Hi Dan,
Just to clarify, you make the distinction between “rented” links, which disappear if you stop paying ARanks, BMR, LinxBoss, TPN (when you gonna review this new service?) or whomever, or if the high PR blog page they put your in-content anchors on, stops being the home page & becomes an inner page…and “permanent” links.

Since links gotten from these services are “impermanent,” what do you consider to be a “permanent” link? Only the links from our own private network?

I got confused because you say “Take the 300 in profit and dump it into quality article submissions or some other type of high quality link building,” as an example of “permanent” link building, but I never thought of article submission links as any kind of permanent, unless maybe submitted to your own private blog network you can control. Anywhere else you submit ‘em – directories, other people’s blogs, etc. – have no guarantee of permanency.

Reply

Daniel January 7, 2012 at 1:38 pm

Hey, there’s no such thing as a permanent link, even if you had your own private network, because a site can go down at any time, right?

However, AR, BMR, UAW those are all article marketing type of links they’re perament even if you stop paying for the service, they will remain active links as long as those sites hosting your articles remain indexed, and for as long as your article son there remain indexed.

By temp, rented links what I mean is… you pay for homepage backlinks, you get high PR links on home pages of these sites since that’s usually the highest PR on those sites, but if you stop your subscriptions to those services, then the HPBL service providers will then remove your links. Standard operating procedure here, since these links work well, and permanent high PR links are hard to come by, and the most “permanent” kind of high PR link you can buy is one that charges a yearly rate, and those are links on sites that usually have tons of OBLs on them.

TPN review is written, just waiting for the go-ahead form them to publish it, theirs is a fairly new service and they want to be sure they and their writers can handle any new influx of customers. Review will be out in next week, as I leave for vacation to the DR on the 16th :)

Reply

rhythm January 7, 2012 at 4:37 pm

Got it, thanks.
So AR, BMR, UAW, etc are examples of “permanent” links.
Any examples of your favorite or most-trusted “rented” links services?

Looking forward to the TPN review, as we do to all your spot-on, honest reviews, thanks!

Reply

PostPanda January 8, 2012 at 8:09 pm

Q1: How long should you give a HPBL service before you give up? Some sites I think won’t respond as well to these services (eg panda-eaten sites). I’m thinking of testing a service for a month or two on one of my previous high-earners (as well as adding regular fresh unique content to it).

Q2: You seem very anti trying to rank inner pages using HPBL services, am I right or am I missing something? I ask because I’d like to rank an inner page of a site, not really interested in ranking the home page. It’s a blog, and not an EMD, so ranking the home page doesn’t interest me much, whereas inner pages are more profitable. To clarify, the home page has post snippets showing and could be ranked for terms like “how to solve problem” while the inner pages could be either longer kw’s or “product name review” type kw’s.

Reply

Daniel January 8, 2012 at 10:16 pm

Good point there, for sure.

I am not totally anti-homepage for using HPBLs. One of my upcoming reviews used the HPBLs for an inner url the results were pretty decent.

You’re also correct that a front page with ever-changing content) recent posts displayed on front page) make it more difficult to rank due to the ever shifting on page seo on home page due to content and title changes.

If you have a well optimized page, a url dedicated and well on-paged for the kws you’re going after, then by all means go for it, but it would get costly if you wanted to rank all your inner urls this way, that is my main point to my seeming anti-homepage with HPBLs, man this sounds like gibberish :)

Page Rank only flows down, but link juice flows upward and outward so depending on your site architecture, you can win either way, really.

Thank you very much for pointing this out, I hope readers of this article read your comment/question, as it adds another item of note that bears mentioning.

Thanks,

Dan

Reply

Elle January 9, 2012 at 2:54 pm

Dan, can you recommend a good old fashioned reciprocal linking and/or one way linking service where the customer pays a company to email complimentary sites and request link exchanges? No monthly fee. Just a flat fee for X amount of links?

Reply

Daniel January 9, 2012 at 3:11 pm

Hey Ellie, welcome back.

This link building method is a slow slow build, and in my experience it’s best effect was getting a trickle of traffic increase from the sites giving the links.

I really don’t see that there’s a better value in getting links in this old-fashioned way as opposed to just self-generating your backlinks.

IMO, you should self-generate-lin-build your way to the top, then it will be YOU that’s getting approached by others, fo rlink exchanges and article exchanges. But now you’re giving a link and alos have to keep track of the sites that should be linking to you still, and forever, or for as long as you’re giving a link back.

To save time, I just ask these requesters to NOT put my article on their site, but to find an indexed, older piece of content on their site with my desired anchor text on there, and just hyperlink and DoFollow link to my desired url. That way I don’t have to have an article written for their site, and am just left with trying to remember which person, site, url is supposed to be linking to me. When you have a lot of sites, this can be a nightmare to track.

Reply

Elle January 9, 2012 at 3:26 pm

I just got knocked out of the first page on Google. For over seven years I was number one for my keyword, using the self-generating method of which you speak. Then last year I got bumped to spot number four. So I tried grey hat stuff. I use BMR and used Linxboss (didn’t work for this particular site, but did for others). Now I don’t know if I should try Linxboss for this site again…I stopped in December after an 11 month trial.

The page is completely gone. It’s rank so low I can’t even find it. I still rank high for other key phrases, but those pages don’t bring in the same revenue. This is not a content site.

So I want to do something that may take time to build, but works. I thought hiring a company to do one way or reciprocal linking would work. While I continue with other methods (article writing, BMR, blog posts and such).

Reply

Daniel January 9, 2012 at 10:11 pm

I sent you an email last week, reply back to that with your site url, and kws you were trying to rank for and I’ll take a peek at it

Reply

Alex January 16, 2012 at 3:24 pm

I think I red all the comments below article and would like to ask : What do you think about violating Google TOS with renting/buying non-permanent links ? Can the website be “caught” and penalized for buying links from the high PR network?

Reply

Daniel January 23, 2012 at 7:58 pm

Hi Alex, PPC is link renting, banner ad renting, and Page 1 gaming but it benefits Google very handsomely so IN THAT CASE, it’s not against their TOS because you’re paying them. Link building, especially non-editorially-driven, self-generated link building is basically a gaming of the “system” and it seems to be that way still…

There’s ways to punish other sites via spammy link building, but I seriously doubt anyone has ever tried to trash their competition in the rankings by sending 100 high pr links their way, know what I mean?

When in doubt, try it out, and don’t listen to anyone or anything except final results, and rankings increases

Reply

Josh January 23, 2012 at 5:17 am

Can you recommend a couple good sources to “rent” these links? Also, what should we pay for them?

Reply

William January 30, 2012 at 5:07 pm

Hey Dan,

If I’ve got $150 to spend each month, do I go with SCN or LinxBoss? I’ve got several domains that I want to rank (decently difficult keyphrases). Thanks!

-Oh…I’m also using BMR, Synnd, and your HPBL service.

Reply

Daniel January 31, 2012 at 5:56 pm

Tough question. I think SCN and Linxboss are comparable in that their IP diversity is a major oomph! point for them, and you… at some point Linxboss’s IP diversity will be better, more widespread, but that’s only if you use them for a very long time. SCN might be good if you only need XXX # of contextual article links to rank something… because if you only need 500 anchor-texted article links to rank something, then IP diversity really isn’t an issue with a 10,00 sites strong network like SCN’s

Reply

Albert May 10, 2012 at 12:25 am

Hi Dan, thanks for your informative article.

I have just bought a pr5 aged domain from go daddy. How can I use this domain to backlink to my money site?

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: