63 Comments on Link Dozer + all that it does – Link Dozer review Pt.2

Paul Forcey on Tue, 2nd Feb 2010 9:11 pm


Just tried the link to look at Linkdozer and it is going to a 404..

Daniel McGonagle on Tue, 2nd Feb 2010 9:55 pm


Hey Paul, I was using their cloaking code, and have since removed it, links works ok now, thanks for checking it out.

Dan

Karen on Tue, 2nd Feb 2010 10:08 pm


Does LinkDozer create an original article for you that ezinearticles.com will accept into their article directory?

Does LinkDozer spin your articles without any input from the user at all?

How is the spinning feature any different than spinning using freetrafficsystem.com?

Daniel McGonagle on Tue, 2nd Feb 2010 10:22 pm


Does LinkDozer create an original article for you that ezinearticles.com will accept into their article directory?

YES

Does LinkDozer spin your articles without any input from the user at all?

At some point yes Link Dozer could do this, the longer you use it the easier it gets to do just that

How is the spinning feature any different than spinning using freetrafficsystem.com?

All I can say is that LD is nothing like any other spinner out there, everything else out there is pretty much all the same (and inferior) when compared to Link Dozer. I really can’t say more than that, sorry

Elbert on Wed, 3rd Feb 2010 1:37 am


The 300 limit isn’t really a scarcity tactic that I know of except to keep Link Dozer safe from spammers and people that aren’t “serious” with working and getting over the huge learning curve.

As for their network… expect it to get bigger in the future. It will be more powerful then ezine itself.

As for the spinning features, it’s very impressive.

I hope anyone that joined is impressed with it as well.

Elbert on Wed, 3rd Feb 2010 1:45 am


Well, technically, it can be more powerful then submitting articles to ezine at the current state, considering how everything works in LD.

Daniel McGonagle on Wed, 3rd Feb 2010 9:03 am


I hope it isn’t a scarcity tactic, either.

But it seems funny how Linkvana still hasn’t closed their doors yet, huh?

I find it hard to believe that Linkvana hasn’t met their membership quota yet

Elbert on Wed, 3rd Feb 2010 6:36 pm


Probably because people cancel it within a month or two especially since it’s $147/month and people don’t see much improvement.

Btw, Dan, did you watch the videos in the forum yet?

Daniel McGonagle on Wed, 3rd Feb 2010 6:55 pm


Elbert, I just got done with all the training videos (close to 3 hours of it there!)

Quite laborious to do that account logins, some places aren’t live anymore, some are dupe domains different areas etc….

I’m going through account creations all this week since it’s really the first part on what to do, and I have the LEAST amount of questions there. I really hate going to forums for help though, but it’s definitely gonna be necessary.

Don H on Wed, 3rd Feb 2010 10:01 pm


Are you seriously raving about Link Dozer and their Contentina network?

Those are ALL PR0 websites! Every single one of them. Practically no backlinks to them whatsoever. Kristina bought them all together in one shot. You seriously think they will be worth anything in Google’s eyes considering they’re full of the same spun spam content?

And the “advanced spinner”.. you can do the same thing with SEnuke.. check out http://www.senuke.com/blog/?p=65

And after that the “automation” is amazing isn’t it? I think Roboform is more automated, lol. They’ve automated the contentina sites sure, but that’s pretty much useless as I’ve mentioned earlier.

Really don’t see how this is so revolutionary.

Daniel McGonagle on Wed, 3rd Feb 2010 10:44 pm


Hey Don, I’ve used SE Nuke and its great for what it does. I know several SE Nuke long time users who are in Link Dozer now and almost immediately canceled SE Nuke after joining LD. If you were a member of LD and watched all those videos, you’d understand why…

“Spun spam content”? After reading that I know for a fact you didn’t watch the videos.

And yes, the automation really isn’t there with Link Dozer,which means nothing breaks down, everything gets posted, you have full control over your sites, content etc… and it’s random linking not pre-determined easily identifiable interlinking footprints and link wheels.

I’m not seeking to convert anyone here from SE Nuke to Link Dozer, SE nuke is great for what it does.

Thanks for stopping by Don..

Dan

Elbert on Thu, 4th Feb 2010 5:12 am


Sorry, I disagree with you there, Don. The spinner in Link Dozer is STILL much more advance and it is designed not to be total automated, so you have full control of your sites, content, promotion, etc.

James on Thu, 4th Feb 2010 7:50 am


Hi Daniel, Every time I setup a new site, I have to outsource the spinning(To achieve high uniqueness I have to rewrite every articles 3 times), will linkdozer help lowering the cost of spinning articles? Also in one of the sales video, I believe it says you don’t have to spend money on content creation, is that true??

Will you suggest replacing many of the link services you review here with LD besides senuke?

Thanks in advance. By the way, thanks for your replies in the other threads.

Daniel McGonagle on Thu, 4th Feb 2010 9:28 am


Once you get things moving with LD, you won’t need a writer and the spinning you do is all done with mouse clicks. It’s quite laborious doing some of this stuff manually though. Whenever I get bogged down doing stuff like account registrations and verifications, I always start pining for BLS which doesn’t need any of that stuff done.
I don’t recommend it over anything yet, but I DO see it’s power. If you’re tech-savvy and focused you’ll kick butt with this software.

Link Dozer looks good, but will be a bear for some people to use at first. I twill get easier to use the more you use it.

Thanks, and you’re welocme,

Dan

Andy on Thu, 4th Feb 2010 5:00 pm


1. How long does it take on average to get use to LD for a beginner in automated link building services? Because $97.00 a month is an investment for most people and to have the 1st month be a learning lesson will repel many people, maybe that’s what their intending to do I’m not sure but either way I’m curious to know how long.

2. I spoke to peter at The Link Juicer about running a male enhancement campaign through there service and it was a no go since the policy states:

“In order to protect the interests of all members, you agree not to post content containing objectionable or offensive language and not to promote directly or indirectly adult, mature, sexually explicit or illegal content, warez, gambling or pharmaceuticals.” – The Link Juicer

My question to you is this, Is LD male enhancement friendly?

3. Also, since I am a newbie at automated link building systems, would LD be your #1 recommended product to someone with my lack of experience?

Daniel McGonagle on Thu, 4th Feb 2010 6:45 pm


Hi Andy, great questions and feedback, too.

I don’t think Backlink solutions has any stipulations about viagra-like content, and I’m pretty sure there Unique Article Wizard would have somewhat relevant sites that would accept this type of content . what you should try to do to remain under the radar is remember that article marketing and syndication is done for backlinks mainly and bare minimum of direct traffic. Therefore you should write generic articles about Men’s Health, which is seemingly more generic and under the radar than “Viagra Pharmacecutical Trial Offer” as an article title.

I think LD would be male enhancement friendly yes.

I estimate it will take a week of 2-hour days before someone could be fully comfortable with using Link dozer

chris on Thu, 4th Feb 2010 7:47 pm


Is the spinner anything like thebestspinner.com?

From what I have read and seen I am starting to think that maybe it is. I know you can’t give any details but a hint would be nice

Cheers.

Daniel McGonagle on Thu, 4th Feb 2010 8:41 pm


The Best spinner does synonym replacements, and doesn’t come close to what Link Dozer’s spinner does, although it is similar in one area.

I wish there wasn’t so much hush-hush about this so I could tell you exactly what it does and why nothing else compares

Elbert on Thu, 4th Feb 2010 9:19 pm


Btw, I would recommend you people should be giving some thought before you join. Google some reviews about Link Dozer.

There is NO refund for this service.

There is a really HUGE learning curve for the tool and how to using it effectively. You will probably spend the first month watching re-videos and playing around with the tool.

The community is only for serious workers. If you want something automated everything, like SENuke, then this tool isn’t for you. The software will never be totally automated.

It isn’t faint for the heart.

Daniel McGonagle on Thu, 4th Feb 2010 10:26 pm


I agree, there is a bit of a learning curve here that makes first impressions of SE Nuke make SE nuke seem simple by comparison. However, it does have the innate ability to keep everything really well organized for users, and that’s a permanent effect.

The learning curve is only a temporary effect.

I am jotting down all my original questions about using this tool in case this becomes a “recommended service”, and if that happens a best practices guide and/or video like the one I give away for Backlink Solutions will be provided for buyers.

Elbert, as you know the video I made for BLS was simple and made things simpler, Link Dozer may prove harder to make a best practice video for, though, so it seems.

Thanks for helping everyone understand this some more, the feedback and reality checks are appreciated and always welcome,

Dan

Klemen on Sat, 6th Feb 2010 10:05 am


Hi Daniel,

just wanted to pop in and say thank you for LD review and your answers on comments,

it was just what I am looking for, since thinking heawily to join LD;

I read all LD review and all of them have that “good felling” inside,

looking forward for your LD results review;

all the best !

Klemen
Klemen´s last blog ..Keyword research service, finding you goldmines of undiscovered keywords

Daniel McGonagle on Sat, 6th Feb 2010 4:07 pm


Hey Klemen thanks for stopping by,

As you can probably tell most Link Dozer reviews, mine included don’t really have a whole lot to say about Link Dozer except for what does.

No real proof of results that matter can be seen thus far. That’s what I try to do here on this site, not pull wool over people’s eyes telling them “my keyword was page 4 now its top 4 on page 1!!!” etc… because the savvy seo/link builder knows that easy terms get page 1 with minimal effort. Once I get to know and use Link Dozer a little bit better, I’ll find some new terms to test then update this review….

Right now, I am wrapping up testing of profiles link building, Free Traffic system, EZArticleLink, and the Spin Distribute service, plus developing a profiles link building service that’s good for a totally hands-off 150 do-follow backlinks a month (should profiles link building be of any real value that is…)

Thanks,

Dan

Elbert on Sun, 7th Feb 2010 9:30 am


Anyways… there’s going to be an awesome major update soon. It just blows me mind, literally. I don’t care if I sound like some cheerleader, coolaid kid screaming like a little girl. That example that Kristina posted is really awesome.

I’ll be doing some tests on my own as well, after I get my things setup and my articles written.

Dan, I think you should just drop doing the profiles links test. It’s just not worth it, in my opinion. The gain is very little, just because it has a PR 7 or 8, it really mean nothing.

Daniel McGonagle on Sun, 7th Feb 2010 9:59 am


Yeah, I just saw that update notification about releasing that BETA soon, which is awesome. I am going through the extra videos on strategies while I wait for my forum questions to be answered. I also emailed them to you Elbert, in case you had some answers.

Right now I got dozens and dozens of things registered, maybe close to a hundred who knows, made some attempts at projects and items, will attempt to build something soon…

NOTE: I have to test profiles link building out to have more than an opinion about its effectiveness. I really don’t take anyone’s word on what works, what doesn’t work in SEO and link building since there’s so much conflicting information. And I’m not doing the testing myself but have had the building and the testing outsourced.

Please respond to my email if you have time, or grab me on Skype again.

Thanks,

Dan

Elbert on Mon, 8th Feb 2010 6:26 am


Hey Dan. Got your email. Hope that answer some of your questions.

Buddy on Fri, 12th Feb 2010 5:30 pm


I’m a member of LD and I’ll bet money membership closes at 300. And I bet the price goes up soon. No affiliate link from me, use Dan’s. This is his rodeo.

We can’t say a lot because of a confidentiality agreement. But most, if not all, of us wouldn’t because, frankly, we don’t want you to know. LD is a HUGE edge that you can’t have unless you join.

But if you are a noob not ready to put in a LOT of work in the beginning, or if you aren’t willing to put in a lot of time creating you own advanced content…use the Spam Tools.

Buddy

Mike on Fri, 12th Feb 2010 6:17 pm


Hi Dan,

Regarding your comment:

“The Best spinner does synonym replacements, and doesn’t come close to what Link Dozer’s spinner does, although it is similar in one area.”

The best spinner actually does phrase replacements. It seems to depend on what users save as their “favorites”. So if a user saves a replacment that’s an entire phrase it would be available to other users.

Is this something that LD offers? Or maybe you can’t say?

Anyway, thanks for the solid review. Looking forward to your results. though I’m probably going to pick up LD soon anyway. Looks like it’s at least worth the $97/month.

Mike

Daniel McGonagle on Sun, 14th Feb 2010 4:17 pm


Hi, I didn’t know the Best Spinner did that. That makes sense then and sounds like a pretty good spinner then, perhaps deserving of the name The BEST Spinner.

Not sure if I am allowed to tell you whether Link Dozer has this or not, but suffice to say that I won’t be needing The Best Spinner any time soon.

Thanks for the feedback,

Dan

Sean Saunders on Wed, 24th Feb 2010 7:11 pm


Wow…lot of spam there.

Any new information on LD? I am super interested. Even if it takes a learning curve, the idea of it sounds too good to pass up. And this 300 limited memberships thing has got my “mouse happy” and I just want to buy.

Daniel McGonagle on Wed, 24th Feb 2010 7:27 pm


Hi Sean , I leave trackbacks open to see what new incoming links are being generated from some services I use the I delete them afterward. Trackbacks work like Google Alerts to let you know sooner rather than later when new links are out there linking to your site.

Nothing new on my end personally with LD since I’ve been sick all week and pretty much too brain-dead to try and work through some parts of the learning curve

Sean Saunders on Thu, 25th Feb 2010 5:22 pm


Ah….I thought people were just spamming the site…thats cool.

You wouldn’t happen to have a page here that says how to do that. I never actually kept track of my links…i just try to build them, though i suppose I should try and start to track and keep better records.

Daniel McGonagle on Thu, 25th Feb 2010 9:58 pm


When you write a blog post there’s an option to allow trackbacks and comments, so you just enable this and let them come in (if at all). It’s not a perfectly reliable system, but it does allows you to lend some weight (social bookmarking) to those links to make them stick. This is basically what Backlink Solutions does, and why BLS works so well, there’s power behind the links, and they stick

Daniel McGonagle on Thu, 25th Feb 2010 10:03 pm


Follow-up:

And when you want to delete all these trackbacks off your site, go to Comments section in WP Admin panel and sort comments by PINGS, and delete them 20-25 at a time, just be careful, because the admin panel reverts backs to displaying Comments, not PINGS after you delete a bunch

Elbert on Sat, 27th Feb 2010 8:27 pm


Hey Dan,

When do you want to talk on Skype about LD? I’m not exactly sure when you are on.

Dan on Mon, 1st Mar 2010 7:03 pm


Would u recommend link dozer or backlink solutions? Which site gives higher quality links?

Daniel McGonagle on Mon, 1st Mar 2010 7:24 pm


BLS works quicker and faster, and not much of a learning curve.

Link Dozer is more scalable and has a steeper learning curve

Daniel McGonagle on Mon, 1st Mar 2010 7:35 pm


As far as quality of backlinks are concerned, I’d have to say Link Dozer provides the higher quality backlinks because they’d be coming from/being generated by quality sites and amidst quality content

DavidN on Thu, 4th Mar 2010 6:04 am


I couldn’t get Link Dozer to work. I’m on Windows 7 so maybe that has something to do with it but who knows. I had to deal with a whole lot of bugs before finally giving up after watching hours of videos.

I can’t talk to much about this but this is some of the things I noticed right away.

* The email creation did not work and after about 10 minutes I gave up and did it in SENuke in about 2 seconds.

* Profile import did not work crashed application the first time and took several tries to apparently be successful – then got out of profile boxes later on.

* Registering for the special blogs did not work. Was forced to use task manager to get out of the program.

* Auto form fill did not work as expected.

* The content spinner did not work period. Very disappointed in this.

I gave up at this point and didn’t bother trying to use the rest of the features as nothing I had tried so far had worked correctly. So this was a hundred bucks down the toilet. I canceled after one day and a lot of frustration.

Link Dozer does have somewhat of a learning curve. Not a bad one (if you can sit through the hours of videos). This program is not for someone who isn’t doing most of their submissions manually. This program is really an organizer for your SEO campaigns. If someone was doing all their link building by hand, this application would keep them organized and possibly save them some time if it worked correctly. The problem is it doesn’t work correctly.

This program does NOT teach you about SEO. It does not setup your random linkwheels or whatever. The user does all of this themselves with no guidance from the system.

I have seen the content this application produces and I’m not impressed. It produces standard spun text that I can spot a mile away. I think people are confusing quality with unique here.

The selling point for this system is it works better and your links will have staying power to keep your site at the top of the search engines. Here is an idea. Promote your backlinks and see if that doesn’t do the same thing. Just common sense here people and basic SEO.

Another commenter on asked about Back Link Solutions. BLS works very well and I would use them over Link Dozer any day.

DavidN on Thu, 4th Mar 2010 9:15 am


BTW Dan,

Couldn’t help but notice in the Comment Policy on your pages

“Please lick the ReTweet (TweetMeme) buttons”

I’m assuming this is a typo or you are having some fun with internet newbies

Daniel McGonagle on Thu, 4th Mar 2010 9:40 am


Dave, I appreciate you trying to help but you’re dead wrong on so many points here that I wonder if you really even used it.

I have Windows 7, I got it to work, Content Spinner works. If you couldn’t get content spinner to work then how are you not impressed with content output?

They provide you with an email to use, so there’s no email creation part to get frustrated with.

It does teach you about SEO, a lot actually.

It does set up random link wheels, its one of the things that’s taught there…

Since LD is a self contained network, you can be registered on hundreds of blogs in 5-10 minutes automatically, and with different logins and usernames for each one stored in the system for you,

I could go on and on on all your incorrect points but why bother, you tried for a day and quit, and it takes at least 1 day to just watch all the videos, then a few more days to build the other stuff up.

Daniel McGonagle on Thu, 4th Mar 2010 9:40 am


Thanks, I’ll fix it

DavidN on Thu, 4th Mar 2010 1:40 pm


Alright Dan,

ARE YOU READY TO RUMBLE!

I always give my honest opinion. I have absolutely no financial interest in any of the products listed on this website. Why would I bash a product I thought would be useful to the readers here? I wouldn’t. I recommend what’s good and point out what I don’t like about a service.

I pointed out problems with The Link Juicer. Guess what? Those problems were fixed although I may have hurt the owners pride a little bit. Now The Link Juicer is on your recommended page. As it should be.

Replies like “I wonder if you really even used it” or “I could go on and on on all your incorrect points but why bother, you tried for a day and quit, and it takes at least 1 day to just watch all the videos, then a few more days to build the other stuff up” are less than helpful.

I do this shit for a living and it doesn’t take me days to set up a program. Xrumer took me all of about 20 minutes to figure out. That’s just rude Dan. Why you wanna be hostile like that?

Now we agree about 90 to 95% of the time but on Link Dozer it’s a huge disagree. I am telling you that this was unusable on my system. Maybe it was my box (I have a very high end computer) but maybe it wasn’t. I was not able to use it. Period.

Daniel McGonagle on Thu, 4th Mar 2010 4:23 pm


Replies in bold:

Alright Dan,

ARE YOU READY TO RUMBLE!

Relax and/or grow up please, this isn’t a p—-ing contest, and I could care less what a less knowledgeable person thinks. I know what I know and with respect toward certain things I know more than most people. There’s too much bad info (and reviews!) out there in the SEO world, so authoritative true knowledge is what I’m after, not the opposite, and it’s the purpose of this blog, basically.

I always give my honest opinion.

So do I, after thoroughly reviewing and using something for a while. Far better to say that something took XYZ days to figure out than to say, “I couldn’t get it to work at all”

I have absolutely no financial interest in any of the products listed on this website.

On the other hand I DO have a vested interest in some of the products of this website since I’m an affiliate of some of the programs and services being touted here. Since I do have much to gain (and much to lose) by making recommendations, I feel the need for accuracy, which is why you’re getting shut down here, I can’t let your inaccurate statements slide by.

Why would I bash a product I thought would be useful to the readers here? I wouldn’t. I recommend what’s good and point out what I don’t like about a service.

Same thing that I do, just more accurately though

I pointed out problems with The Link Juicer. Guess what? Those problems were fixed although I may have hurt the owners pride a little bit. Now The Link Juicer is on your recommended page. As it should be.

Replies like “I wonder if you really even used it” or “I could go on and on on all your incorrect points but why bother, you tried for a day and quit, and it takes at least 1 day to just watch all the videos, then a few more days to build the other stuff up” are less than helpful.

I do this shit for a living and it doesn’t take me days to set up a program. Xrumer took me all of about 20 minutes to figure out. That’s just rude Dan. Why you wanna be hostile like that?

Strike 1- You said Link Dozer doesn’t teach you about SEO. You’re wrong, she does.

Strike 2- You said Link Dozer doesn’t make open ended link wheels. You’re wrong it does, it’;s in on eof the videos, and is part of what’s TAUGHT here.

Strike 3- You said the email creator doesn’t work, you’re wrong about this too since there’s no need for an email creaor because they’ve already done that for you, plus provided hundreds of aliases that can be and are associated with that email address

Dave, you’ve been pretty rude with some of your comments here on this site directed towards the newbies you look down your nose at.

Now we agree about 90 to 95% of the time but on Link Dozer it’s a huge disagree.

This means you’re right 90-95% of the time then

I am telling you that this was unusable on my system. Maybe it was my box (I have a very high end computer) but maybe it wasn’t. I was not able to use it. Period.

I have a Dell Inspiron laptop with Windows 7 on it and it works fine, so the issue there is with your high-end box, not with Link Dozer and not with Windows 7

Daniel McGonagle on Thu, 4th Mar 2010 9:06 pm


Might want to watch this video if you’re thinking of switching from Windows 7 to Windows vista

marco on Sat, 6th Mar 2010 11:22 am


I have tried Link Dozer for almost 2 months now and after some initial excitement I must say I am rather disappointed, and let me tell you why
Buggy it is, even though Kristina is great at customer service and helps you out and does fix issues and actually she even refunded me the first month of service due to the many issues.
To date, the yahoo mail creator is not working (Yahoo changed the format about a month ago and LinkDozer has not yet been updated), the populate form will fill only 1 or 2 fields and even those are misplaced (username in zipcode field for instance)
The ‘powerful’ spinner will not allow you to spin sentences, you can only select groups of 6 words or less for spinning
the account creation is NOT automated, you have to go through all the sites and manually click the various submit buttons etc and again some of the sites have changed the forms and are not updated, plus there are still tons of kickapps sites that are unusable (after senuke users spammed the hell out of them…) yet they are still listed and you have to wade through them to figure what is what

the amount of sites you can post to is nowhere close to 1000 as mentioned above, unfortunately, maybe closer to 150/200 I would sayPLUS the C1 and C2 sites really shouldn’t be counted twice as they are on the same IP/domain, just different subdomains, PLUS the c1 / C2 sites have low to no PR AND in some cases they are from the same IP thus not really giving you much benefit in terms of IP diversity.
True, you have the peace of mind of knowing that even though you don’t own the sites you can post/edit/delete as if they were and above all be sure that your blog will not be removed, but is that worth the price tag? I personally don’t think so and again, I have been using it intensively for 2 months+

Marco
marco´s last blog ..California and The Gold Rush

Elbert on Sat, 6th Mar 2010 12:52 pm


Hey Marco, you should cancel your subscription. It’ll be better for the LD community and yourself.

Hey Dan, can we talk on skype? I have a question about something and I can’t post it here on public.

marco on Sat, 6th Mar 2010 1:33 pm


Hey Elbert, I did cancel it, however I think I am still entitled to have my opinion and express it??

marco
marco´s last blog ..California and The Gold Rush

Daniel McGonagle on Sat, 6th Mar 2010 8:25 pm


Yes you are entitled to your comments and feedback, thank you for those.

Sometimes people get possessive, defensive or territorial about the programs or services they use. Many SE Nuke people got mad at me for opining that Link dozer was/is better than SE Nuke. Fact is, it’d be great if some things in Link Dozer were more automated, but what’s being Taught is very valuable and worth the first month’s fee, easily

Daniel McGonagle on Sat, 6th Mar 2010 8:26 pm


Elbert, I’m on Skype all day, just turn yours on and you’ll see me with status online most likely

Elbert on Sun, 7th Mar 2010 2:17 am


Hey Macro, I wasn’t attacking you or anything, you are entitled to have your opinions.

I was just stating that since you had a hard time using the software, it’s better to cancel it since you’re just wasting money.

However, the reason I sound like the way I was is this… I saw duplicated content in the C1, the article was even not even changed one bit, and it look like it was blasted out into the blogs, and I see the 2 same links pointed back to your blog. I’m fairly certain they belong to you?

I apologize if I sound like I’m latching at you, but I am very sure Kristina explicitly stated to never post duplicated content to the C1/C2, because as she stated herself : “If you intend to post the SAME ARTICLE you will get duplicated content which is a BIG NO NO. Every duplicated article can potential penalize your compaign. I am not saying this because of me,, or because it is someone’s imaginary idea, but because it CAUSES DAMAGE to your SEO to publish duplicated articles as well as to the sites that you post your articles to.”

DavidN on Sun, 7th Mar 2010 10:13 am


There is no duplicate content penalty. All that will happen is Google will only index one of the pages. The site being linked to and the site publishing the duplicate content will not be penalized in any way.

That said not spinning the article would be a huge waste of time because only one link would count when posting to all these blogs.

http://linkvanareviews.com/duplicate-content-penalty-test-quick-update

marco lavanna on Sun, 7th Mar 2010 10:40 am


Hi Elbert,

yes I did have a few duplicate articles, and Kristina was notified of it, as it actually happened while i was having issues with LD. Like it was hanging on me and the only way was to shut it down via the Task Manager. People were having the same issue with registrations where LD would hang and they would get like 600 registratin emails from one of the C1 sites, there were several cases posted in the forums) . I actually spent a number of late night hours with Kristina on MSN trying and testing for her and for the other members and, AGAIN, i think she does a great job.
I am perfectly aware that of what was said about duplicate content, though I think it is partially a myth,(there is an interesting post on google webmaster central dating back to 2008 demistifying it..) and yes i did sometimes articles that were not changed one but BUT, those were Ezinearticles, copied verbatim from EzineArticles, as a regular blog owner would(should) do.

Still , the number of blogs where you can post to is very limited. posting to articles.domain1.com and then to news.domain1.com still shows backlinks coming from ONE IP, and on top of that most of those domains have 0 to no PageRank.

And also the content spinner restriction to six words sequences is a severe limitation.

I am not saying it is bad or a scam or anything like, i do think Kristina is a great person and always ready to help, just that it is overrated , and that of course is my personal opinion, and it still forces you to do a lot of tasks yourself or outsource those tasks, which could be fine by some people but it is not what I was looking for.

marco
marco lavanna´s last blog ..Read and identify forex signals

Elbert on Sun, 7th Mar 2010 2:49 pm


Hi David,

That’s what I meant by penalty, all the duplicates will get discarded or don’t count, eventually by google. What I meant by damaging the site is, it can also deindex the whole site publishing the duplicate contents, if the site is over use in duplicated content.

Macro, you can try out BLS and or ezearticles.com, I’m still seeing great result with BLS, just use the things taught from Kristina and use them on BLS and you get even better results.

I hear good things about ezearticles.com from people, and you can outsource spinning from articles for couple of bucks with their writers. I haven’t use it since I chose LD over ezearticles.com at that time.

Daniel McGonagle on Sun, 7th Mar 2010 4:39 pm


Hey guys,

Elbert, I’m on Skype almost all the time

Marco, I not only demystified the whole dupe content issue but also proved it and showed others how to demystify it for themselves here > http://linkvanareviews.com/duplicate-content-penalty-test-quick-update

David, thanks for pointing out that on site reference.

Folks, the easiest thing to do when faced with indecision on seo myths, ideas, theories, etc,,… is merely to go out and test things in a reasonable way

DavidN on Mon, 8th Mar 2010 12:03 am


Elbert no a site using extensive duplicate content will not be de-indexed. Imagine a blog that has several post excerpts on it’s homepage – this will probably (at least in my experience) get past the duplicate content filter and Google will index it. Of course this imaginary blog will only rank for the keyword phrase in its domain name as its pages have been flagged by the duplicate content filter.

Google has only a few things it will do to any site it considers to be misbehaving. There is a -30 and a -950 penalty, de-indexing (rare) or nullifying the value of certain types of incoming links. Do some research and know what these are and why they are applied. This will help you quit worrying about Big G and focus on getting traffic to your sites.

Daniel McGonagle on Mon, 8th Mar 2010 9:39 am


David’s right, the pages get de-indexed not the site, but site will only rank for keywords in its domain name.

free software on Tue, 9th Mar 2010 7:48 pm


I found this on google, thanks for writing this, it was just what I was searching for!

Link Dozer Review · Jeffery's tigriso.com on Fri, 12th Mar 2010 9:52 am


[...] is an an SEO tool that applies special link tactics to drive more traffic to your business. A Link Dozer system has been allegedly produced by Link Dozer owner Kristina Saric primarily on a whim in an [...]

Jason K. on Fri, 12th Mar 2010 3:16 pm


Thanks for the review, such as it is… I’ve never seen such secretive software before. I’m gathering from what I’ve read so far that the software is great, though it may be buggy (as most newer software is). It keeps you organized, lots of great features, semi-automatic link building, and very good training which is sorely needed due to the steep learning curve.

But the one thing I haven’t seen is results. Even just a preliminary set would be helpful so that we can get some idea whether of not this service is worth the money. It doesn’t matter how many cool features the software has (or how great the content spinning is) if it doesn’t do the job it was intended to do!

Daniel McGonagle on Fri, 12th Mar 2010 8:26 pm


I agree with you 100% and I really don’t like writing informative reviews without showing some sort of results to back things up and deliver a verdict of sorts, but LD got me all wrapped up in some video tutorials and complicated other stuff, so I ended up canceling it and just using a LD user to syndicate an article for me as the test I am doing for this. This test article is going out in a few days (hopefully) so I will post results soon.

LD’s “secret” has a lot to do with what The Best Spinner does, fyi

Jason K. on Fri, 12th Mar 2010 9:55 pm


Cool, I’ll watch for the update. I have The Best Spinner, which I think is great (if a bit quirky at times) so I think I have an idea of the LD “secret” you are talking about. Still, I’m not going to pay LD $97 per month for a spinner, unless there is really something else that sets it apart. I look forward to the update.

Daniel McGonagle on Fri, 12th Mar 2010 10:13 pm


Yeah, article is done now to get it off to syndication land. LD makes it real easy to make an rss feed out of your submitted article sand ping them and ping the syndicated articles as well, right from the interface, plus allows for social bookmarking right from the interface. I liked their interface better than SE Nuke’s because it was presenting you with logical to-do steps at the right times AND in the right areas.

Everyone talks about LD’s learning curve and yet the software interface is something even Jakob Nielsen would approve of. What Nielsen writes about > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/action-object-closeness.html

Review on The Link Dozer « Moses's awesomeblogs.org on Fri, 12th Mar 2010 11:38 pm


[...] an SEO tool that makes use of special linkbuilding strategies to drive more clients to the sites. A Link Dozer system has been allegedly created by Link Dozer owner Kristina Saric essentially on a whim in an [...]

COMMENT POLICY: If you want comments approved, please ask real questions or add real value to the conversation.... Please click the ReTweet (TweetMeme) buttons if you want to say "Thanks" for great content

Name (required)

Email Address (required)

Website

Speak your mind

CommentLuv Enabled

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail