Linx Boss Diary, follow up review see for yourself

by Daniel McGonagle on June 21, 2010 · 12 comments

in Linx Boss

Just doing a follow up here on the other post on Linx Boss.

This is just gonna be my way of tracking and proving things to you, follow along if you wish

kw url 1,mlmnetworkmarketingtraining.org

Day 1- Not Ranked for term mlm training

Day 3- #Page 35

Day 5- Page 21

Day 7-  Page 18

Day 9- Page 4-6

Page 3 now (at top)

NOW: #17

kw url 2, linkbuildingservicesreview.com

Day 1- Not Ranked for term link building services

Day 3- #176

Day 5- #76

Day 7- #72

Day 14 – Page 5 (started Link Aloha this same week so updates are getting skewed at this point)

Day 24 – #15

kw url 3, http://dreamteamsales.com

Have had this url in LB for a couple of months now, and currently it’s page 9 or 10 for term mlm training, not ranked for terms sales training or network marketing training yet.

Update:  (started Link Aloha this same week so updates are getting skewed at this point)

Page 2 for the following terms

  • network marketing training
  • mlm training
  • direct sales training

Page 7 for term network marketing

NOTE: All of these aforementioned urls are going to be getting additional links from Link Aloha which I just joined, so I’m publishing the Linx Boss diary/review here and now to show clearly what one service (LinxBoss) did for those sites, rankings-wise before other services were introduced into the mix

 

 

Click Here To View The Top-Rated Link Building services

Related Posts:

Download Targeted Subscribers Wordpress Plugin Here

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Kurt Henninger July 9, 2010 at 4:03 pm

Hey man,

Just a follow-up here to say THANK YOU for introducing me to linxboss. I’ve already seen one of my urls get from page 3 to mid page 1 in a very competitive niche and industry, and gotten real, measurable traffic, leads and sales as a result.

Super simple to use, and as close to automatic link building as it gets.

Kurt

Reply

2 Paul Forcey July 18, 2010 at 1:48 pm

Hi

just wanted to pop in and give my experience..I rented a spot off a buddy of mine to test the process, $25 a month for one site and I agreed to give it a go for 3 months.

So I laid down my $25 and put my site in (very easy to use interface) and moved on..
About 4 days later I saw the site appear on adsense..earned a dollar (yahh woopee)..then it carried on growing.
The site has been in linxboss for 2 weeks and has made $20.53 on adsense and $8.91 on amazon.

$29 is not going to excite people but think on this.
-it is a winter niche so I expect to double the traffic come October
-The links stay in place so the rankings should stay (all else being equal) even when I change sites.

I plan to leave the site in the linx boss system for a month then change it and see if the next one does as well. So if my $25 investment returns me $29 (and i expect it to be more) every month for the next year then I am a happy man.

I understand that $125 a month may be too much for some people to lay down, so why not team up with a mate and go halves.

The other thought I had was that this niche is non competitive one so it takes less links to move it, to optimize the ROI you could use 2 spots for harder phrases and then 3 for easy wins to get a quick increase in income.

Links are important but they work better when your keyword choice,on page seo and internal linking is good. It all needs to be right to really score.

Daniel put me onto ezarticle links and that has proved to be a winner and now this so all I can say is cheers!

Paul

Reply

3 Daniel McGonagle July 18, 2010 at 5:35 pm

Paul, thanks for popping by with this feedbqack. I wish more people were so realistic and astute with the services they use. First priority with link building should be an expected ROI and it seems you know exactly how to be realistic AND get ROI, even when just testing something, good job and thanks again, hopefully your feedback helps others get more ROI/be more realistic and choosy with their rankings terms attainment quests.

Dan

Reply

4 Matthew K August 23, 2010 at 12:28 pm

Daniel,

Any idea if the L4L feature gets updated regularly? I know they go out and get all the backlinks that you already have, but what about going forward? Do they search for those on a regular basis or is it a one time thing?

Thanks,

Matt

Reply

5 Daniel McGonagle August 23, 2010 at 12:34 pm

I really don’t know Matt, I’ve tried to talk to Tommy at LB about this but he seems really busy, and I don’t expect full blown explanation via email or support desk, but you cna try going that route (ask LB about L4L) since I really don’t know how it works, or IF it works!

Reply

6 Luke Lee September 1, 2010 at 1:53 pm

I asked Erik this question and he said “L4L updates periodically….”

Reply

7 Matthew K August 23, 2010 at 12:48 pm

I’ll try that. I signed up about 5 days ago and I still don’t have anything in the offset tab. Just got my L4L links showing today. I had emailed support and Erik said it would take 48 hours. I’m not complaining if it works as promised.

I might try to find you on skype this week if that’s cool. I have some strategy questions for you if that’s cool.

Reply

8 Daniel McGonagle August 23, 2010 at 12:50 pm

No worries, I’m working on a strategies page for the site now since I get a lot of questions about this and would prefer to educate people up front, so after they buy UAW< LB< BLS, etc… they know exactly how to use it well

Reply

9 Matthew K August 23, 2010 at 12:55 pm

That would help tremendously. Feeling a little lost right now and getting frustrated. Every where I turn though, I see one of your websites at the top, so I know you’re the man to ask. I just need a step by step system to follow. Thanks for your help!

Reply

10 TJ September 2, 2010 at 12:31 am

Dan, thanks for all your work on LB. The L4L overview video and the L4L training 1 videos were good – but I would like to see a bit more customer service to answer questions.

Has anybody checked L4L with seo spyglass, or related tool, to see how many links to your existing links have been created? The 100x phrase (and was commented on that it doesn’t mean 100-backlinks, but could eventually) was repeated a few times. I have checked BMR and found 38 links to the original url. Is LB’s L4L goal to automatically create links to existing site links, and auto create backlinks to new LB1 links, and backlinsk to links to authority links? – created by us; and auto-backlinks to us manually filling out the offset info? If so, what type of reporting will be created by LB so we can review the info? Saying it and doing it for us to check are two different issues.

My assumption is that the authority site update will be in the next week or two.

Reply

11 Daniel McGonagle September 2, 2010 at 12:45 am

Your guess is as good as mine about L4L, they haven’t been that responsive lately, and while disappointing somewhat expected from programmer type dudes.

I don’ t know why the “other” links are called offsets, that right there confuses me, and ho wit all works and how to use L4L most effectively also boggles my mind, so I don’t worry about it too much, I just use LB for links to main page urls and other services to link up the inner urls.

Wish I could be of more help, but I’m not getting any answers either, and I’ve had talks with other users about this, too, and while some of them understand the concepts well (like I do) nobody can really pin down how effective it really is, nor how best to utilize it

Reply

12 TJ September 2, 2010 at 1:27 am

Dan, I sent you an email with a couple links that need to be shared. Maybe you have addressed the issues before, but I feel they deserve review. If you wouldn’t mind replying to me in an email or on here – I would be grateful.

I may have missed you mentioning the issues that I refer to – in prior posts or a prior year. I am more than a little concerned about h what I read.

Thanks,

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: