SEO Content Network Review (Powerhouse or not?)

by Daniel on March 6, 2012

in SEO Content Network

One of the 15 23 readers of this site went ahead and got a link building service called SEO Content Network going.  SEO Content Network, A.K.A. SCN… is a network of privately owned sites that you can post articles to, to get backlinks from.  (apologies to Sister Margaret for ending last sentence with a preposition :( )

I’ve been testing out SCN for about 2-3 months and on a whole slew on keywords… WAY too many keywords to name here, though.

I tested out about 50 different urls and keyword combinations and pretty much everything I linked to using multiple anchor texts moved up in the rankings.

Here’s the nitty-gritty of what you probably want to know about SCN

  • Network size is small-ish 720 sites, will grow as membership grows.
  • You can add videos, podcast links, pictures etc… to your posts making them seem more real and the more real your submissions look the better the results will be due to making the time spent on url last a little but longer and helping boost the sites quality and turn them into possible permanent traffic sources.
  • Pricing plans range for reasonable to unreasonable.  One pricing level is 997/month and is really only good for someone providing seo services because seos make a profit of 1k/month per client usually, at very least, if they’re doing things properly.

Anyhow, is this an effective network used properly? Yes

The better your articles are, and the better your “hooks” are, ie author resource boxes and compelling anchor text links, the better you will do with this service.

But what I just wrote is basically just normal article marketing tips that we should all know.

I’m not sure if your video embeds submitted will play automatically to drive up page views for your videos, which seems to be a ranking factors, for videos.

With SEO Content Network, you can schedule your posts, you can drip feed them to a set number of blogs, posts so as not to reduce the effectiveness of any spun content submitted.

If you submit one unique article and give certain parameters, instructions to the SCN submissions interface, it will then spin your unique article for you and send it out to desired number of blogs, and for XX # of days.

Before we get into the potential controversy of value and costs/link obtained we should know that SCN gets 100 or so social signals to each blog post made on their network.  They’re basically doing for their network what all of us should be doing for our own sites, and that’s getting some web 2.0 links, and social signals.

Also, not to sound like a schill for SCN but some of their sites are spot-on-relevant for certain niches and these are traffic generating sites, meaning that, if your anchor text is compelling then you’ll get temp-to-perm traffic from your submissions (just as you would with article ranked highly on major article directories, but private network submission sallow for more freedom in anchor text and what-not).

I’ve presented an idea to them for review that they seem OK with developing, and if they go through with it I think it will be a really safe way to get backlinks and traffic from your submission efforts.

To remain fair and unbiased, I’d like to recall a comment made by one of the readers (Paul) here which is that for 997/month a lot more can be achieved seo-wise without relying on just one network for your backlinks.

But even I don’t have a pressing need to generate 1000 backlinks/day so the lower levels SCN offers are more appealing and realistic… to me anyways.

But as I mentioned before, if you’re an seo looking for new backlink sources and your 100 clients only need 5 links a day generated, then your all set here with SCN, despite it being just one source for backlinks.

Do I recommend this service as an effective link building service, Yes if cost/link obtained is taken out of the equation (and if I didn’t procure us all a discount :) ).  I know there’s a lot of readers on this site who are making big money as seos and if you’re looking for a replacement for ELN, SEOLV Elite, or any of the other high priced networks which OBL-backlinks-bombed themselves out of existence, it’s good to know that there’s a new network out there that’s done fine with panda 3.3.

Because I tested out so many urls with SCN, I’m not going to describe all their pre-and-post rankings here, but one thing I do want to mention, something that surprised me, was that I took a piece of PLR content, modified it to include an introductory paragraph, and got it to page 2 for a pretty high volume keyword.  This really surprised me, because I used

  • PLR content for site content being linked to, inner url too
  • Spun article submissions set to a level a lot higher than they recommend using
  • 4 anchor texts, not as much variance here that I would use moving forward, post panda 3.3

I also had another campaign going for another site and this campaign was devoted solely to 1 site, and I actually forgot these campaigns were going because the submissions were scheduled out for months at a time in advance.  Traffic to that test site grew slowly every month, despite rankings not exactly soaring.

If you decide to go ahead and get SCN, please follow their best practices, and star toff with a lower/lowest level membership and go from there.

I talked to Dan at SCN and he tells me that retention rate of clients is pretty high, higher than most services I’m aware of, even my own, and mine kicks ass so go figure! ?  This means that the client’s paying 9997/month or whatever…are happy.

If I was a reader of this blog, I’d be reading this review wondering, “Does Dan highly recommend this, or sorta recommend it or what?  Would Dan use it himself, does Dan use it himself”

Well, I “sorta” recommend it.  I see people cancelling Backlink Banzai memberships, and even my own offering due to budgetary concerns, so not everyone has the coin for this, but that’s really not my issue, not unless I want to become/present myself as another MMO guru teaching you how to make more money so you can afford more services like this.

Brass tacks…  As it stands right now, SCN is effective, it works, and if they employ some of my other ideas then it will be something with far-reaching permanent value, and not go the way of all other blog networks which historically get hit and devalued.

I didn’t sign up for an affiliate link for this service yet, but I did manage to secure some lifetime discounts, coming soon.

For right now, I’d like to see a Cordial and Polite discussion started here in the comments section in case there’s something you want to know that I omitted, that perhaps Dan can answer for us, or I will come back and update/improve the post here.

UPDATE: As promised, for those who want it, a discount has been provided for me, for us for you whatever….

Since I pressured them to give us discounts, the discount is as follows

  • Join at  Basic level and get upgraded to Advanced level (500 daily backlinks)  for free
  • Join at Advanced Level and get All Start level (1k backlinks/day) for free

Once you join at either level, email daniel  AT seocontentnetwork  DOT com and tell him I sent you to SCN  to procure your discount

Here’s aff link to use to get the discount.

UPDATE 2: WTF I forgot to add that the discount availability ends at end of this month, so is a limited time kinda thing, but discount is for life, so I am told…

{ 262 comments… read them below or add one }

Zachary April 17, 2012 at 12:24 am

I think the statement about good links from de-indexed sites is totally false. How can that be a good link? Google de-indexed that site for a reason and if you’re getting a link from that site, it definitely won’t be considered a good link! I think that the decision to keep de-indexed sites in the network because it’s getting traffic might be a bad decision. This might hurt your customers.

Also, i’m not too happy about the results i’m getting with SCN so far. I have multiple campaigns using SCN and none of them are moving up the serps. In fact it’s the contrary. I’ve even had my best site disappear (still indexed though). Don’t tell me it’s the google dance cause i know what the google dance is as i’ve been in this industry for 5+ years now. And this site age is 3 years now in case you’re wandering.

Now you’re saying that you use traffic as a metric for your sites. But ever since my site dropped off (another site which is newer not the one i’m talking about above), i’m not getting any of this traffic either from the serps or from blogs in the SCN network. Since i’m now not getting any serp traffic, it would be easier for me to notice if i’m getting any traffic from SCN blogs or any other site, but i’m not.

As it stands, i’m not a happy camper and i might have to evaluate my membership pretty soon. I know that it would take a couple of months to get decent results, but it should not take too long to see slight results.

Reply

SEO Content Network April 17, 2012 at 1:07 am

Zachary, let me go step by step through this with you.

The point that I was trying to make is that because we are syndicating URL’s to de-indexed won’t hurt sites in the serps. I guess you missed where I have discussed us deleting these sites?

I am sorry your not seeing the kind of results you want to from SEOContentNetwork.com however you have never contacted us as we are very open to helping our customers utilize our network. As Daniel said in his review, SEOContentNetwork.com will be great in the right hands. Please feel free to email me: daniel at seocontentnetwork dot com.

I won’t argue with what your seeing, all I can do is offer my help.

I am sorry that you have seen my comments about traffic being our number one metric, as I have repeatedly said it. When Daniel interviewed me we discussed that aspect almost the entire time. We have lost potential customers because they didn’t like that metric.

I am sorry that your not a happy camper, I hope that you or any of customers who aren’t seeing results would contact me so I could help. The type of results each site gets is dependent on many factors.

I can tell you what I have been telling my other customers who have asked privately what gets the best results.

The #1 strategy that of our most successful customers are doing is: Adding YouTube embedded videos to each URL Submitted. This makes sense, as on page YouTube videos increase the time people stay on a page. It also is another type of “link” and helps generate more traffic back to their site.

If you can’t come up with a unique YouTube video for each URL we also suggest you add the picture from the Google+ account that is associated with the site and add that. Because we are doing syndication it would give even more power to the article. (Note: Use the Author’s picture for all Web2.0, Article Directory Articles, and Press Releases).

We strongly encourage you to add the YouTube embedded code, the Google+ picture url.

Zachary, I would like to thank you again, for your comments and I hope next time to be able to discuss them privately so I could help you achieve good results.

Reply

Arshu April 20, 2012 at 2:44 am

Can anyone report about any positive improvement solely using this service, it is yet to excite me……am using only this service at lot of website just to know its pure effect. If any backlinks has power and so forth it should show some g**gle dance or positive ranking, but still unsure how it gonna make things easier in longer run.

Reply

Arshu April 23, 2012 at 2:02 am

Sorry for mine last comment, i had stop using SCN for last 20-25 days and after consulting with DAN2, he said because of my stunt link velocity hurt badly and i cannot see any improvement. As per his suggestion one should use 90 days strictly without any breaks following his said applicable strategy for your own campaign else don’t complain like me, thanks dan2 for personalized help. Looking forward the expected results in near future.

Reply

Don April 25, 2012 at 8:20 am

I have been using SCN for 3 weeks.
Followed the tips on the site and advice given by Daniel yet got no results.
Absolutely no increase in SERPS for any keywords.
I would love to hear if anyone else has good results.

Reply

SEO Content Network April 25, 2012 at 7:06 pm

Don, as Dan says “sites don’t help themselves”.

I just looked through your account and you didn’t do some of the basic things we suggest:

-Onsite Optimization and your sites are not optimized including some having adsense above the fold. Some of your sites are really thin on content. The sites have much to be desired
-We advise to add your own videos. “When” you have videos they aren’t yours.
-You did less than half of your daily links. You are short by 8835.

Sites don’t help themselves. Your sites aren’t optimized, you didn’t use your own videos, and you used less than half of your possible links SEOContentNetwork.com isn’t going to work magic, you have to do your part.

Part of doing your part is also being patient. SEOContentNetwork.com is now very much in line with Google, because of all the syndication we do. As I have shown before Google allows syndication. Syndication builds authority and trust, not to mention the links associated with the syndicated articles. But syndication takes time, it isn’t an overnight increase. And if you have thin sites, that aren’t onsite optimized there is only so much SCN can do for you. As I said earlier today:

I have noticed that many affiliate sites are getting hit. But we looked closer and noticed why:

1) Sites are thin on content
It amazes me that after all of Daniel’s warnings and Google saying that thin sites aren’t going to cut it people are still attempting this

2) Site use duplicate content
One of our customers was hitting his site really hard, with no results, this surprised us, and so we went and looked at his site. He had paid a “writer” to create content for his site. But the content that he paid for came from Amazon. Most of it was a direct copy; some of it was “spun articles” where the writer did a good job choosing quality logical synonyms. Somehow these articles passed copy scape. Lesson for all, make sure the content on your site is yours, or if it isn’t give credit to the site you’re getting it from.

3) On page optimization isn’t done
Many of these sites are missing easy components of onsite optimization. Many of these same sites have their adsense above the fold. If you are going to do link building to your site, at least make sure it is fully on-site optimized.

SEOContentNetwork.com has always been about traffic, but our goal is not only traffic from our sites, but traffic from the authority and trust it builds with Google and our sites readers. These things aren’t built over night, in a week or even a month, they occur over time from constant white hat techniques, including syndication, and the occur from how the traffic that comes to your site occurs. If a customer clicks on your links on one of SCN’s sites, they are more likely to stay longer and to even purchase your service/product, and this will help you in the search engine rankings. But this takes time, as Google builds the data it collects about your site. If you’re looking for a quick answer, then you’re likely to get your site red flagged and not having it be as effective as you would like.

Sorry for the “sermon” but what I am saying is true for everyone. If you want to do well with the search engines make sure your site is optimized 100% (or as close as you can first).

Reply

Briggstown April 26, 2012 at 12:01 am

I had quite a few Web 2.0 pages that went up in rankings and have maintained their rankings after this latest Panda tweak. My own domains didn’t do as well, though.

Reply

Briggstown April 27, 2012 at 3:17 pm

Also just to add on to this. Normally the Web 2.0 pages moving up helps my main site to move up, but the way Google is working now it’s not helping at all.

Reply

SEO Content Network April 27, 2012 at 3:35 pm

A big part of this latest algorithm change is on site optimization. So back links will only have an affect if the site is fully optimized, isn’t thin, and has other user friendly things on each page such as pictures and videos. So oned web2.0 links will move up and have little effect on a non-optimized site. Google should have done this long ago rather than focus on back links, but focus on the quality links.

Having said that, you can use your web2.0 links to generate traffic while you work on the site. In some ways your sites will come out stronger because your back link portfolio will be really strong and your site will be even better.

I have seen a lot of online marketers quit over this latest algorithm change when they could come out on top by spending the time they need too.

Reply

SEO Content Network April 25, 2012 at 11:18 am

Quick update, though the latest Google Algorithm has had some huge issues and will go through some changes in the next few days, none of our sites have been hurt at all.

Here is what Google announced: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2012/04/another-step-to-reward-high-quality.html

We have no article in our network like the examples shown, so it makes sense why our network is just fine.

I have noticed that many affiliate sites are getting hit. But we looked closer and noticed why:

1) Sites are thin on content
It amazes me that after all of Daniel’s warnings and Google saying that thin sites aren’t going to cut it people are still attempting this
2) Site use duplicate content, or “quality spun content”
One of our customers was hitting his site really hard, with no results, this surprised us, so we went and looked at his site. He had paid a “writer” to create content for his site. But the content that he paid for came from Amazon. Some of it was a direct copy, much of it was “spun articles” where the writer did a good job choosing quality logical synonyms. Somehow these articles passed copy scape. Lesson for all, make sure the content on your site is yours, or if it isn’t give credit to the site your getting it from.
3) On page optimization isn’t done
Many of these sites are missing easy components of onsite optimization. Many of these same sites have their adsense above the fold. If you are gonna do link building to your site, at least make sure it is fully on-site optimized.

Of course there are other reasons, but if you take care of these first, you and your sites will be happy campers.

Reply

Briggstown April 25, 2012 at 4:23 pm

Lol, it’s not that easy writing or outsourcing thousands of articles. Especially when you aren’t making any significant money from your sites.

I have about 70 articles on my site and 100 or so pages indexed in Google. I’m thinking that I probably should have had a bare minimum of 300 articles written in the niche.

Reply

SEO Content Network April 25, 2012 at 7:18 pm

Briggstown, I do understand that. Part of the reason it was easy for us to make the changes we did, we wanted our customers not to spend time or money on writing content to put into our system but to put on their site(s).

For a new site/blog I think doing 1 a day is good until you get to 300, then 2-4 times monthly after that, though watch the changes to algorithm to make sure you still follow best practices.

After you do 300 articles/blog posts, then go back and do a 30 second review videos for each article/blog post that you post on YouTube and then embed in the article/blog post.

Reply

Paul Clarke April 26, 2012 at 2:47 am

Darn it – my record has got stuck.
Same old same old. After a very strange day yesterday (when many of my dead and buried adsense sites from 3 years ago sprung back into life for 30 hours, and some made a sizable income for the first time in almost 3 years) today has seen the dust settle.

My advice – unless you are/were signed up to one of the now de-indexed link farms don’t measure your sites progress against your links.
Measure your sites progress AGAINST YOUR SITES CONTENT.

All my “big sites” (100,000 word plus – at least 1 year old) have actually improved (well except one that has has gone down – but stupidly I had that full of PLR stuff…)

My little sites?
They’ve all gone again.
It was like going back 3 or 4 years in time yesterday with people buying TV sets and patio heaters again.
But the dust has settled and now my big sites are back and my little ones (at least the little ones with proper unique content) are back and doing better than ever.

I have even ranked for a site I’ve only just started building and all I’ve done is send a couple of bookmarks and pings to establsih ownership of the written content.

WHo knows if it will last though?
Having Google as a business partner – no matter how you act and how White Hat you are is like opening a bank as the silent partner of Billy The Kid or playing cards with Joe Pesci’s character from Goodfellas.

Who the hell knows what they’re going to do next? No one i suspect, and the internet is so big and the effects of their algo so complex – I doubt if even they know.

Google – the psychotic bumbling sociopathic giant, stamping recklessly and without thought on people’s livlihoods without so much as an “oops”.

I’m not even certain they are trying to “give users the best search experience” any more – or if they think they are their thinking is distorted by greed.

Reply

SEO Content Network April 26, 2012 at 11:43 am

Google doesn’t care about the small business, or if they destroy some ones livelihood, they care about the bottom line. Corporations don’t care who they hurt along the way, as long as their pocketbook increases. If Google really cared, they would work with website owners to tell them, hey we know you’re doing this, stop or we will ban your site, not these “We see un-natural linking to you site” scare tactics. I do know that if you bug/pester Google enough they will give you small examples of bad links to your site. But if they cared about not hurting people then you would think they would take a more hands on approach. They hate “automation” yet they automate everything, I am sure they don’t see their own hypocrisy. I hope someday that Google will work with website owners and SEO’s in a much more productive way. When a person is in college learning to become a teacher, they learn that positive re-enforcement to a person always gets a better reaction than always “punishing” a person. I hope Google changes their approach. I for one would work one on one with Google if it meant I could run a business without the fear of Google shutting it down because of some new theory they are testing out or because of someone else’s actions.

Reply

Paul Clarke April 26, 2012 at 12:13 pm

“They hate “automation” yet they automate everything, I am sure they don’t see their own hypocrisy.”

Yup – when push comes to shove Google is one big automated link farm – nothing more nothing less.
They are the EXACT and polar opposite of everything they say we should be.
They are a directory that sells links for high profile rankings – or pushed links around for best profit if you don’t buy

Oh you thought they pushed them around for “a good user experience”
Well having Amazon pages that are marked “Under Construction” ranking number one against small affiliate pages that have been there for several weeks for the same product says otherwise.

THis doesn’t even make any sense financially for Google.

Who is going to bid on PPC against Amazon (an idiot)
And why would amazon pay for PPC when they are number one already in the far more popular natural search.

In this scenario…Who pays for PPC at all?

But trying to double guess Google is something left for those with a twisted sense of humour.

The REAL moral of this story for ALL OF US is DON’T RELY ON GOOGLE FOR TRAFFIC.

It’s like playing blindmans bluff with rattle snake

Reply

Paul Clarke April 26, 2012 at 12:17 pm

I’ll add.
Everything on Google is scraped and duplicate
Everything is automated
Everything is a self serving link or internal link
In fact everything IS a link – they are a website that adds ZERO VALUE.

If I wanted to go to Amazon..well I don’t even go to google at all.
I bookmark amazon and go straight their via my bookmark. same with my sports sites, same with Ebay, same with most of them.

Coming to a time when I don’t need them or their flakey “shopping mall ordered” results at all.

Reply

Colin May 5, 2012 at 1:06 pm

Like many, I was hit by the Penguin update. Checking through the backlinks to my site using Majestic SEO, I found a number of the SEO Content Network sites on which I have links, but testing a sample of 5 showed that 3 were de-indexed.
I had assumed that this syndication approach was “safe”, but it seems that it is not immune.

Reply

SEO Content Network May 5, 2012 at 1:21 pm

Colin, though we have gotten rid of many of our de-indexed sites we have kept those that still provide the highest amount of traffic for our customers. We take these sites out of the network as we add other sites that have the same level of traffic.

The sites that Majestic finds of our network are usually the oldest sites. We still have less than 10% of our overall sites de-indexed. To counter, we continually grow our network. For example at the very start of April we added 115 non-blog sites to our network and every single one of those are still indexed. In fact we have added many since then as well and all have survived.

Since our number one metric is traffic, we work hard on buying domains that have traffic so that we can pass that on to our customers sites. We also have system of sites we are adding that will continue to follow Google’s syndication rules, but won’t get de-indexed.

Though I can’t promise sites won’t get de-indexed in our system, I can say that we are constantly growing our network, and we will continue to do so. As we do, we will get rid of the de-indexed high traffic sites for sites that are indexed and have the same level of traffic.

Reply

Briggstown May 14, 2012 at 2:27 pm

What kind of non-blog sites?

Reply

SEO Content Network May 14, 2012 at 2:30 pm

Please send me a private e-mail at daniel at seocontentnetwork dot com and I would be happy to discuss further.

Reply

SEO Content Network May 6, 2012 at 4:07 pm

Just to let you all know by the end of May we will be adding a press release service that we will offer free press releases to our customers. We have also started adding wiki sites to our network as well.

We are continually evolving and changing to adapt to Googles algorithm changes.

Reply

Briggstown May 20, 2012 at 6:45 pm

Good, I’m so tired of these wordpress-only blog networks.

Reply

SEO Content Network May 29, 2012 at 1:02 am

On Saturday Matt Cutts tweeted this:

@mattcutts: Minor weather report: We pushed 1st Penguin algo data refresh an hour ago. Affects <0.1% of English searches. Context: http://t.co/ztJiMGMi

As of yet we haven't seen this adjustment have any effects on our sites. But we are watching all changes in our networks traffic, rankings, or loss of being indexed.

Reply

Dennis June 11, 2012 at 1:37 am

any updates on this?

Reply

Daniel June 11, 2012 at 6:57 am

Dennis, it’s a recommended service. They’re doing things to try and ensure they don’t go the route of all the other blog networks, and current users are telling me it’s working pretty well for them, but of course they’re scared that their success will disappear BMR-style. but like I said, they’re being careful

Reply

Mark August 21, 2012 at 3:14 pm

Hey Guys,

Now over 2 months in with them, no movement on any of my terms and not a single link showing up anywhere. Oh and no response to a support ticket asking what’s going on.

Have them become a simple scam at this point?

Reply

SEOContentNetwork.com August 21, 2012 at 3:19 pm

Mark, we are not a Scam at all.

I haven’t received any “support ticket” that I haven’t answered.

Please feel free to email me at daniel@seocontentnetwork.com

I would be happy to walk you through the best practices of SEOContentNetwork.com as pointing SCN only at your own site isn’t best practices!

Reply

SEOContentNetwork.com August 21, 2012 at 3:24 pm

Google for that: “Uncorked Ventures – Blog – Mourvedre”

3 of the top 10 results are from sites in our network…

“Detroit Chiropractor Directory | Gentle, Effective Chiropractic Treatment For All Ages!”

2 out of the top 10 are from sites in our network…

“Uncorked Ventures – Wine Gift Baskets”

1 out of top 10 is from a site in our network.

“Uncorked Ventures- When You’re Ready for Better Wine and Gift Baskets”

1 out of top 10 is from a site in our network.

Reply

Mark August 21, 2012 at 6:02 pm

Daniel-

Direct email sent-let’s talk. Also, any chance you’ll honor that free upgrade from above (guess I am hard to please)

Reply

Sean Saunders December 21, 2012 at 4:15 am

This service sucks. No changes. No improvements. I actually think they are just taking my money and doing nothing. I’ve done to money sites and to tiers 1 and 2. No changes. Anyone else getting results? Am I using this service that terribly?

Reply

SEO Content Network December 21, 2012 at 10:45 am

Dear Sean

Thanks for your comments here. Our personal conversation was very different than your comment here. As I pointed out to you before, you should ensure you embed both an Image and YouTube video with each submission. All of our sites are crawled 20-30 times daily by the Google bots, but the posts that get crawled have either the image or video, those posts that get crawled more than one time, embed Both a video and a image. The majority of your back links have neither.

Also, I have shared our sites with Daniel McGonagle in the past and am willing to now. We do this because the majority of our sites don’t do ping backs, not Word Press sites,and the majority of our sites aren’t found by back link software/websites. The only sites that show up on back link finding software/websites are our Older Word Press sites that we don’t even count as part of the back link numbers for our customers. These are extras. These extra sites will also go away early in 2013.

The tier 1 sites should be Authority Sites like:
Google+
Facebook Fanpage
Pinterest
Ezinearticles
PRWeb
Etc.

And to the tier 1 back links should focus on just one keyword.

Tier 2 would be
Profile
Blog comments
Wiki links
Etc
Should be pointed at your tier 1 back links as well, but you can point SCN at your Wiki links as well.

You can still point SCN at your or customers websites. We suggest you don’t do keywords rather our option of no keyword so you have a URL link pointing at your or customers websites.

Sean and fellow LinkVanaReview.com readers feel free to contact me at daniel@seocontentnetwork.com if you have any questions.

Also, Daniel McGonagle has a special offer for his readers he will be sharing hopefully soon. Let me give you a sneak peak at it, for those who sign up through Daniel for the All Star package through January 31, 2013 you will get 10,000 daily links (that’s 310,000 back links in January alone, not to mention all the days in December your a member)! Then after January 31st you will get 5,000 daily links. Or if you want you would also be able to down grade to the basic package and still keep all of your 310,000 links in January.

Sincerely

Daniel

Reply

SEO Content Network December 22, 2012 at 12:07 pm

Sean-

We also did more research on your account. You need to do keywords pointed at your authority links. Doing the majority of your back links as URL links isn’t going to have the desired affect!

Also, your sites need updating. Onsite optimization isn’t occurring on the majority of your sites.

Also, ensure your using the Authority Sites are being used properly will help. Make sure all your “original” pictures themselves are not only being embedded into your posts in SCN but you put them on an authority sites such as Pinterest and Facebook. Most of your sites lack quality original videos.

SCN is really affective “if” your site(s) are on site optimized and your using authority sites appropriately then SCN is a great tool! You have some work to do on your sites.

We have researched your back links in our network and they are page one for the titles we have for them.

Our network has been doing exceedingly great when it comes to generating traffic to each site and article/blog post. Those articles/blog posts that do the best have both images and videos.

Unlike all the other “blog networks” we no longer use Word Press, Joomla, etc. We also follow Googles rules on syndication (why we advise all our customers to embed videos and images). SCN keeps on top of our network daily for Google Bots, traffic, and article/blog post SERPS rankings. And unlike all the other networks all of our non-wp/Joomla/Drupal sites have survived and thrived through all the Panda, Penguin, and other algorithm changes.

-Daniel

Reply

Sean Saunders January 8, 2013 at 10:09 pm

Been awhile since I replied, but you must have me confused with someone else. We had no personal conversation. My links are not URL links, they are all keywords. I have no idea what you are talking about.

“Onsite optimization isn’t occurring on the majority of your sites.”

The sites I submit to SCN are mostly tier 1 links, not necessarily authority links and they are not my sites…. so I don’t understand how my onsite optimization isn’t “occurring”. Aside from maybe 2 niches sites I have submitted directly though you, you have no way of know my “onsite optimization”. I’m using you guys as a “supposed” tier 1 backlink builder. But the effects are pretty much nil from what I can see.

And while it’s true that I don’t add pictures or videos, it clearly says optional on those fields… am I to understand I need pictures and videos on all my SCN posts to be effective? At 500 posts per day, that’s a lot of video and images to be adding.

I’m spending $100 a month on this service and I don’t feel it’s giving me any real value. That’s my experience at least… perhaps others think different and are getting more value out of it. Clearly they are doing something different than me if they are getting results.

But for the sake of “doing things right”, I’m going to submit my next several hundred, perhaps thousand posts with both image and video. We’ll see if that has any real benefit. I’m going to do this with tier 1′s which can take as much heat in links as I can give them — maybe some hubpages and squidoos and tumblrs. We’ll see where they get using just SCN. I’ll report my findings in a few weeks.

Reply

SEO Content Network March 10, 2013 at 11:50 pm

We have updated all 3 packages:

Basic Package now gets 300 daily Links (9,000 monthly)
Advanced Package now gets 1,500 daily links (45,000 monthly)
All Star Package now gets 5,000 daily links (150,000 monthly)

Unlike all the other “blog networks” we no longer use Word Press, Joomla, etc. We also follow Googles rules on syndication (why we advise all our customers to embed videos and images). SCN keeps on top of our network daily for Google Bots, traffic, and article/blog post SERPS rankings. And unlike all the other networks all of our non-wp/Joomla/Drupal sites have survived and thrived through all the Panda, Penguin, and other algorithm changes.

All of our sites are being crawled by Google at least 20 times daily.

We also follow Googles TOS on how to do linking and I think you will be impressed on our customer service and our suggested strategies.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: