SERPAssist review

by Daniel on September 14, 2010

in SERP Assist

SERP Assist is another one of those tools that’s supposed to make  “nuke-ing” the Web with content for links acquisition a lot easier, and it looks good, and appears nice…Conceptually

SERP Assist does what SE nuke should have done all along, in that it’s web-based, is very user-friendly with a more intuitive interface than SE Nuke, and it also has some SEO-mind-mapping diagrams to use for helping you organize your thoughts and your campaigns.

Oh, and it also has a scheduler, too, so you’re not being a blatant ‘nuker” of the web, but can schedule your blasts to appear more natural and to decrease the number of accounts getting deleted at bookmarking sites, RSS directories,  web 2.0 sites, etc…

By the way, SE Nuke X will have all of this, but SERP Assist was the first tool/software/service out of the gate that actually does this, kudos SERP Assist!!!

Too bad it doesn’t do a heck of a lot though.

Who cares how cools it is conceptually, when the fact is, there’s not a lot of sites that SERP Assist will submit to?!

I got this off their site today, it’s not an updated list, but not my fault they don’t update their sales letter.

You’d be better off using Rank Builder for cheaper price, and ability/potential to get way more links with Rank Builder, which is ALSO not recommended (at this time)

Updates:

  • SERPAssist has 24 Web 2.0 sites
  • VOX is going bye-bye, will be replaced by another entity

 

 

SERP Assist

SERP Assist

 

{ 18 comments… read them below or add one }

eusof September 14, 2010 at 5:14 pm

SERP assist dont seem too impressive to me. :)

Reply

Kishore Parankusam September 14, 2010 at 9:14 pm

I took a free trial. Currently there are around 24 web 2.0 sites.

Reply

Dan September 15, 2010 at 4:18 am

I tried it a couple of weeks ago. A couple of site tasks don’t get completed on their backend. But you can get it for a very low price compared to SeNuke

Reply

Neil September 15, 2010 at 3:26 pm

That’s the problem though, I bet we’ve all got loads of cheap tools on our hard drive that we never use – I don’t mind paying for something that works well.

Having said that if it can post and promote a few web 2.0 properties well it could be very powerful. Never really liked the sound of SEnuke so might try this out.

Reply

Andy W September 15, 2010 at 3:27 pm

Daniel, if you could only use one tool for your link building, which would it be? Firstly on value for money and secondly where money is no object?

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 15, 2010 at 4:30 pm

I’d get a membership going at MyBlogguest and just do guest blogging all day long, that’s best value for money by FAR…. just not a realistic thing to do if you have 250-500 adsense sites.

For those on a budget:
profiles linking> Sick Profile Maker,
article marketing/syndication>> Article Marketing Robot ,
indexing network, Link Farm Evolution-created indexing network.

If you’re not on a budget, then

Xrumer/DripFeedblasts/Aloha/Xrumer-SEO for profiles link building

Web 2.0 SeNuke Outsourcing- Xrumer-SEO

Article marketing/syndication – UAW, Syndicate Kahuna, Article Marketing Robot

Blog networks for links- Same as above, for most part (hybrid networks really)

Indexing network buildup -Link Juice Maximizer (someday soon) Backlink Energizer, and setting up a BIE net
Best Lazy Man’s linking services: LinxBoss, DripFeed Blasts

Reply

Andy W September 15, 2010 at 4:36 pm

I am using LinxBoss but may cancel and try something else at the end of this month.
Looking at UAW at the moment but price says $67 – not $57. Mainly because I need to really diversify the anchor text and backlink lots of blog posts. I am doing well with the big keywords but not so well with long tail.
As I read your review that sounds like what I need (let me know if I am wrong!)

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 15, 2010 at 7:00 pm

Andy, where did I write “57″? Trying to find and edit that…

Thanks,

Dan

Reply

Andy W September 15, 2010 at 7:10 pm

Just had a quick look – cant find it wither. Someone else commented about it as well but I also cant find that! Maybe in a comment on a different page somewhere.

Arshu September 15, 2010 at 3:31 pm

Back-end is slow to respond to your actions, it doesn’t give supply that much power aka link juice, which everyone was expecting it!

BTW: creating manually all the web 2.0 properties and submitting in content network is best as seen with real effect for low-competitor keywords :D

Reply

Andy W September 15, 2010 at 3:35 pm

Is this doing a similar job to WP Syndicator then?
As once you have set up those accounts it posts automatically to them for you.

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 15, 2010 at 4:01 pm

Posterous does what WP Syndicator does, it’s free though.

SERPAssist is nothing like either of those 2

Reply

Dan September 17, 2010 at 6:23 am

@Daniel:

You mention UAW with $57 at:
http://linkvanareviews.com/effective-link-building-services

Dan

Reply

Andy W September 17, 2010 at 6:27 am

Well done Dan – I couldnt find that anywhere

Reply

John Cowburn September 20, 2010 at 7:18 am

Hi Daniel

If Serpassist increase their linking sites substantially, would you then feel it is worth buying? I just like the look of the way it works – very intuitive and also feel that the slow but steady way of working may achieve lasting results.

Reply

Daniel McGonagle September 20, 2010 at 7:36 am

Yes, then I would recommend it, sort of. They’re charging too much for it now though…

Reply

Paul Clarke September 22, 2010 at 1:20 pm

Serpassist seems to have the right concept. It’s quite simple to use, and it does the job.

As it currently stands, it misses off too many of the top PR web2 sites for it to be worthwhile. UNLESS you make a small “inner” ring of these yourself first (3 or 4) and add the serpassist to do the “donkeywork”
End of the day it needs 20 more sites, and it needs to add all the really good ones.

Reply

Terry December 27, 2010 at 10:54 am

Well, I liked serpassist… I thought it was a clever tool. Unfortuneately, I’ve had submissions waiting for 15 days to get completed. Obviously, that is just not gonna work…

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: