I sent Callen an email the other day asking why the syndication of the articles in My Article Network we so slow as compared to Unique Article Wizard and Article Marketing Automation.
He had a good answer (you can tell he’s a nice guy, btw…) and he said that My Article Network (I call it MAN ) is basically a re-branded copy of Article Marketing Automation (referred to as AMA), and that MAN is drip-feeding the articles out to sites at a pace that is conducive to good SEO practice.
That’s all well and good, but my most-published articles is on 31 sites total after 2 weeks in the system.
- AMA is known for getting 125-250 sites to publish your articles.
- UAW (Unique Article Wizard is known for getting 250-500 sites to publish your articles.
MAN will have to rapidly accelerate the pace of the article syndication just to reach the level that AMA has been known to operate at, never mind on UAW’s syndication pace.
I’ll give MAN another 6 weeks, by then I’ll know if it’s going to do any serious syndication or not.
I wonder how many jokers are promoting it heavily right now to win affiliate cash prizes, even though the service has been open for only 2 weeks…not enough time to measure or validate the effectiveness service
As part of my continued testing of effective link building services, right now I am testing Unique Article Wizard out and considering testing SE Nuke out as well.
Here’s a good review on SE Nuke, every other review I’ve read has shown temporary results or just background information on what it is, and where to join (their aff link)
This guy here seems to know what he’s talking about so check out his SE Nuke Review
I will, of course review this myself because you can’t give something a really bad review without testing it first. There’s no legitimacy behind the reviews, otherwise.
I won’t link to their sales page because they’re using hyped-up drivel for sales copy.
On their sales page they’re claiming as proof that their software works so well, the fact that they own the first 3 pages in Google for the name of their product.
That’s 100% laughable because anyone can do that with minimal ease and effort, FOR KEYWORDS THERE’S NO COMPETITION FOR!
sorry for the caps, done shouting there.
Look, do you think there was a lot of competition for the terms se nuke prior to se nuke’s creation? No, of course not, so that means there’s zero competition for that term.
which makes the claims on the sales page ridiculous to those who know a “little bit” about SEO like myself.
Peace to you, I’m still joining once I free up some times.
P.S. A buddy of mine is canceling his 1waylinks, 3wwaylinks, and mywaylinks accounts because there are better and cheaper versions of everything he has out there already. Plus, I showed him how to test what link building services are doing the job for him and which ones aren’t and he got kinda pissed off then was happy that I saved him some time.
Recommended Link building Services
Download Targeted Subscribers Wordpress Plugin Here
{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }
Here’s the post/page on how to test linkbuilding services
Here’s the page for recommended linkbuilding services
Hey Dan,
I noticed that “the guy” with the SENuke review that you link to hasn’t even used the program. His entire argument for telling everyone not to buy the program is based purely on the fact that he doesn’t like the words (trick, spin, and seed in his case) that the creators use on their website. I agree with the author of the review that a program like SENuke can be used to spam websites which will probably get you banned eventually. However, the use of the software is up to the user. You’d probably be safe if you just spread things out over time a bit.
Anyway, I’m wondering if you stopped using SENuke purely based on price and not technical problems. I’m thinking of investing in it but I can’t seem to find anyone who actually says how well it worked in the technical sense (web 2.0 sign up, article submissions, RSS submissions, etc.). I don’t want to pay that much for something that only works 10% of the time. Any feedback is greatly appreciated. Great site by the way! Keep up the reviews.
-Pat
What I didn’t, and still don’t like about using SE Nuke is that the Web 2.0 sites get deleted at an unacceptable rate, and that’s what SE Nuke does best of all; the Web nuke stuff. Technically, it is a massive resource hog and you need a gamer-like PC to run this software, and that’s absolutely unacceptable also.
SE Nuke should have their own article directory, RSS directory, social bookmarking site (even a Scuttle) so at least 1 links out of however an SE nuke blast generates will stick, forever…. otherwise it’s just like build a links ofundation on your site with Red Bull,; it’s great while you’re flying high and getting lotsa links, but when stuff starts getting deleted on you, crash-time comes pretty quick.
Hey Dan,
Thanks for the quick response. That is disappointing that the web 2.0 sites get deleted so quickly. I wonder if there is an explanation for this. I guess I’ll just have to test out the trial version to see if it’s going to cause my computer to act weird. Thanks again for the response.
- Pat
HI,
The reason why the web 2 sites get deleted so quickly is because of the links in them so early in the life of the site.
Do a few posts without any links and you start avoiding them getting deleted.
Just seen you don’t like Senukex, but you recommend Linkboss that is well known for producing poor quality backlinks.
There’s something amiss with your methods of earning commissions from your glowing reviews of poor quality services.
Hi Jason, I don’t think I’ve written ANYWHERE that I don’t like SENUKEX. I’m open to constructive criticisms as long as they’re accurate, or at least based on facts. As it stands right now, here’s an update on senukex, which i got a yearly license for: Don’t use their linking diagrams, make your own custom ones, and get as far away from senukex standard use as possible since that’s what most people will be doing, therefore making a footprint that will someday get devalued, kind of link those old school link wheels got devalued since they were deemed “linking schemes”, which is merely just a linking diagram that got popular, so much so that it became footprinted and deemed scheme-ish.
Anyhow, I tried SE Nuke older versions, and outsourced several campaigns to SE Nuke Services and my main problem with the services is that the links and entities didn’t stick, so if you create a random open ended linking “thingie” and some or a LOT of your web 2.0 entities got deleted since they’re one hit wonders… then the overall value of the spam-content-mass-syndication-link wheels-pyramid-push-blah-blah-blah is kind of worthless when your one hit wonders start falling apart at the seams because they’re linking out to more and more dead/deleted/removed urls.
SE Nuke is good in the right hands, but I know pro SEO guys who use it merely to keep an influx of temporary links coming in to their satellite sites, and they hesitated to get senukex because Joe and Areeb haven’t really addressed the question of “what’s gonna make our SE Nuke X properties sticky?”
Jason, the reason I got the Yearly license for SE Nuke X is to give it a thorough review and going-over, I got a whole year to work this puppy, and I’ll be able to report back in 3/6/9/12 months on its effectiveness, stickiness of entities, best ways to use etc….
In the meantime, the crappy links form LinxBoss are on a private network and those links are as sticky as you can get, because they’ll be there for as long at the network is up and running.
You should also think about this: SE Nuke X is more user friendly now, so it means more people can successfully use it, which means more registrations at the web 2.0s, which means more lazy folks sending crap content poorly spun out into the ether, and it means we’ll have to work out our own custom diagrams and best practices to make it work well.
SE nuke seems like it’s a good money making tool, but as far as an SEO tool, we shall see.
I hope some of this makes sense to you.
I understand your reasons for thinking something’s amiss with my earning commissions with things, but in my little twisted head, I DO have a problem recommending something that produces temp rankings and produces entities that get deleted because it means you gotta keep churning out spammy content and fake profiles and stuff whereas some permanent links (like crappy LinxBoss links) have a better ROI for you in the long run.
Hey Jason,
Thanks for the response. I went to the senuke forum and found that other people were using the same method that you described. As for LinxBoss, it used to work really well up until about the end of January 2011. I joined it in November of 2010 and I was seeing some amazing results with my rankings. However, sometime in the first few days of February my rankings suddenly fell like a rock. I can only attribute this to something that happened with LinxBoss since that’s all I was using for backlinks at the time. I’ve managed to get most of my rankings back with manual blog commenting, but that really pi**ed me off about LB since I had paid almost $250 by that point for it. That’s a lot of money for a college student.
So in conclusion, I think Daniel’s posts from last year that recommend LB were accurate since the program actually worked back then. Different story nowadays though.
Also, are you using SENuke X right now? If so, how do you like it? I’ve read great things on the forum about it. I want to get it but I just can’t comfortably cover the cost right now. Hopefully sometime in the next few months I’ll get to that point.
- Pat